Abstract
Unlike epithelial cancers that are both more homogeneous and easily categorized by their respective tissues of origin (e.g., breast or lung cancer), sarcomas represent a diverse class of molecularly distinct bone and soft-tissue mesenchymal neoplasms of more than 50 subtypes. This diversity, as well as the relative rarity of sarcomas as a whole, has presented challenges in conducting prospective randomized clinical trials to assess the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for any given subtype. Most clinical trials and meta-analyses have neglected the phenotypic and molecular heterogeneity differentiating one sarcoma subtype from another in favor of a simplified grouping that ensures timely trial completion. As the success of treating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) with imatinib demonstrates, a decision to provide neoadjuvant chemotherapy must take into consideration both the subtype being treated and the effect such treatment would be expected to exert upon that subtype.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 327-333 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of Surgical Oncology |
| Volume | 101 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 15 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Adjuvant
- Biomarkers
- Cancer
- Chemotherapy
- Surgery
- Survival
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Oncology