Neuropathology of HAND With Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy

Encephalitis and Neurodegeneration Reconsidered

Benjamin Gelman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

HIV-1 infiltrates the central nervous system (CNS) during the initial infection and thereafter plays a persistent role in producing CNS dysfunction as the disease progresses. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) are highly prevalent in HIV-infected patient populations, including currently infected patients with good access to suppressive antiretroviral therapy (cART). cART decreased the severity of CNS dysfunction dramatically and, in doing so, upended the neuropathological foundation of HAND pathophysiology. It is clear that the working concept of pathophysiology prior to cART, which was driven by inflammation, encephalitis, and neurodegeneration, needs to be replaced. The NeuroAIDS field is reluctant to take that important step. This review explores the fact that the neuropathological concept that drove the field before the era of cART no longer seems to fit with what is commonly observed in patients treated successfully with cART. The field clings to the pre-cART idea that HAND is sequentially driven by virus replication in CNS, brain inflammation (encephalitis), and neurodegeneration. Neurovirological, clinicopathological, and gene expression correlations in cART-treated patients, however, provide little strong support for it. Introducing cART into clinical practice decreased HIVE, inflammation, and degeneration but did not cure HAND. Brain gene array data suggest that the neurovascular unit is a critical target in virally suppressed patients with HAND. The NeuroAIDS field needs an infusion of new ideas to steer research toward issues of the highest relevance to virally suppressed patients. With no suitable replacement immediately within reach, devaluating formative ideas is understandably difficult to accept. The cliniconeuropathological correlation in virally suppressed patients needs to be better defined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)272-279
Number of pages8
JournalCurrent HIV/AIDS Reports
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Encephalitis
HIV
Central Nervous System
Therapeutics
Inflammation
Virus Replication
Neurocognitive Disorders
Neuropathology
HIV-1
Gene Expression
Brain
Infection
Research
Population
Genes

Keywords

  • Antiretroviral therapy
  • Dementia
  • Encephalitis
  • HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders
  • HIV/AIDS
  • Metabolic encephalopathy
  • Neurodegeneration
  • Neurovirology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Virology
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Neuropathology of HAND With Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy : Encephalitis and Neurodegeneration Reconsidered. / Gelman, Benjamin.

In: Current HIV/AIDS Reports, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.06.2015, p. 272-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4d78a68835bc4de8a3b3ce7bd7075020,
title = "Neuropathology of HAND With Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy: Encephalitis and Neurodegeneration Reconsidered",
abstract = "HIV-1 infiltrates the central nervous system (CNS) during the initial infection and thereafter plays a persistent role in producing CNS dysfunction as the disease progresses. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) are highly prevalent in HIV-infected patient populations, including currently infected patients with good access to suppressive antiretroviral therapy (cART). cART decreased the severity of CNS dysfunction dramatically and, in doing so, upended the neuropathological foundation of HAND pathophysiology. It is clear that the working concept of pathophysiology prior to cART, which was driven by inflammation, encephalitis, and neurodegeneration, needs to be replaced. The NeuroAIDS field is reluctant to take that important step. This review explores the fact that the neuropathological concept that drove the field before the era of cART no longer seems to fit with what is commonly observed in patients treated successfully with cART. The field clings to the pre-cART idea that HAND is sequentially driven by virus replication in CNS, brain inflammation (encephalitis), and neurodegeneration. Neurovirological, clinicopathological, and gene expression correlations in cART-treated patients, however, provide little strong support for it. Introducing cART into clinical practice decreased HIVE, inflammation, and degeneration but did not cure HAND. Brain gene array data suggest that the neurovascular unit is a critical target in virally suppressed patients with HAND. The NeuroAIDS field needs an infusion of new ideas to steer research toward issues of the highest relevance to virally suppressed patients. With no suitable replacement immediately within reach, devaluating formative ideas is understandably difficult to accept. The cliniconeuropathological correlation in virally suppressed patients needs to be better defined.",
keywords = "Antiretroviral therapy, Dementia, Encephalitis, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders, HIV/AIDS, Metabolic encephalopathy, Neurodegeneration, Neurovirology",
author = "Benjamin Gelman",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11904-015-0266-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "272--279",
journal = "Current HIV/AIDS Reports",
issn = "1548-3568",
publisher = "Current Science, Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuropathology of HAND With Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy

T2 - Encephalitis and Neurodegeneration Reconsidered

AU - Gelman, Benjamin

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - HIV-1 infiltrates the central nervous system (CNS) during the initial infection and thereafter plays a persistent role in producing CNS dysfunction as the disease progresses. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) are highly prevalent in HIV-infected patient populations, including currently infected patients with good access to suppressive antiretroviral therapy (cART). cART decreased the severity of CNS dysfunction dramatically and, in doing so, upended the neuropathological foundation of HAND pathophysiology. It is clear that the working concept of pathophysiology prior to cART, which was driven by inflammation, encephalitis, and neurodegeneration, needs to be replaced. The NeuroAIDS field is reluctant to take that important step. This review explores the fact that the neuropathological concept that drove the field before the era of cART no longer seems to fit with what is commonly observed in patients treated successfully with cART. The field clings to the pre-cART idea that HAND is sequentially driven by virus replication in CNS, brain inflammation (encephalitis), and neurodegeneration. Neurovirological, clinicopathological, and gene expression correlations in cART-treated patients, however, provide little strong support for it. Introducing cART into clinical practice decreased HIVE, inflammation, and degeneration but did not cure HAND. Brain gene array data suggest that the neurovascular unit is a critical target in virally suppressed patients with HAND. The NeuroAIDS field needs an infusion of new ideas to steer research toward issues of the highest relevance to virally suppressed patients. With no suitable replacement immediately within reach, devaluating formative ideas is understandably difficult to accept. The cliniconeuropathological correlation in virally suppressed patients needs to be better defined.

AB - HIV-1 infiltrates the central nervous system (CNS) during the initial infection and thereafter plays a persistent role in producing CNS dysfunction as the disease progresses. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) are highly prevalent in HIV-infected patient populations, including currently infected patients with good access to suppressive antiretroviral therapy (cART). cART decreased the severity of CNS dysfunction dramatically and, in doing so, upended the neuropathological foundation of HAND pathophysiology. It is clear that the working concept of pathophysiology prior to cART, which was driven by inflammation, encephalitis, and neurodegeneration, needs to be replaced. The NeuroAIDS field is reluctant to take that important step. This review explores the fact that the neuropathological concept that drove the field before the era of cART no longer seems to fit with what is commonly observed in patients treated successfully with cART. The field clings to the pre-cART idea that HAND is sequentially driven by virus replication in CNS, brain inflammation (encephalitis), and neurodegeneration. Neurovirological, clinicopathological, and gene expression correlations in cART-treated patients, however, provide little strong support for it. Introducing cART into clinical practice decreased HIVE, inflammation, and degeneration but did not cure HAND. Brain gene array data suggest that the neurovascular unit is a critical target in virally suppressed patients with HAND. The NeuroAIDS field needs an infusion of new ideas to steer research toward issues of the highest relevance to virally suppressed patients. With no suitable replacement immediately within reach, devaluating formative ideas is understandably difficult to accept. The cliniconeuropathological correlation in virally suppressed patients needs to be better defined.

KW - Antiretroviral therapy

KW - Dementia

KW - Encephalitis

KW - HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders

KW - HIV/AIDS

KW - Metabolic encephalopathy

KW - Neurodegeneration

KW - Neurovirology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937758281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937758281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11904-015-0266-8

DO - 10.1007/s11904-015-0266-8

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 272

EP - 279

JO - Current HIV/AIDS Reports

JF - Current HIV/AIDS Reports

SN - 1548-3568

IS - 2

ER -