TY - JOUR
T1 - Neuropharmacological assessment of the discriminative stimulus properties of the novel anxiolytic ipsapirone
AU - Cunningham, Kathryn A.
PY - 1989
Y1 - 1989
N2 - The novel anxiolytic ipsapirone appears to interact selectively with 5‐hydroxytryptamine1A (5‐HT1A) receptors. The present study investigated (1) the discriminability of ipsapirone using a two‐lever, water‐reinforced task and (2) the importance of 5‐HT1A and catecholamine systems in the ipsapirone cue. To this end, rats were trained to discriminate ipsapirone (7.5 mg/kg; N = 14) from saline. Dose‐response tests indicated that the ipsapirone cue was dose dependent. Buspirone and 8‐OH DPAT substituted while the dopamine (DA) D1 agonist SKF 38393, the DA D2 agonist quinpirole, and the α2‐adrenoceptor agonist clonidine engendered saline responding. Furthermore, the D1 antagonist SCH 23390, the D2 antagonist sulpiride, and the putative 5‐HT1A antagonist spiroxatrine did not block or mimic the ipsapirone cue. This research suggests that catecholamine systems do not play a prominent role in mediating the stimulus properties of ipsapirone. Moreover, while the substitution profile for ipsapirone suggests that this novel anxiolytic may be a selective 5‐HT1A agonist, blockade of the ipsapirone cue by a 5‐HT1A antagonist remains to be established.
AB - The novel anxiolytic ipsapirone appears to interact selectively with 5‐hydroxytryptamine1A (5‐HT1A) receptors. The present study investigated (1) the discriminability of ipsapirone using a two‐lever, water‐reinforced task and (2) the importance of 5‐HT1A and catecholamine systems in the ipsapirone cue. To this end, rats were trained to discriminate ipsapirone (7.5 mg/kg; N = 14) from saline. Dose‐response tests indicated that the ipsapirone cue was dose dependent. Buspirone and 8‐OH DPAT substituted while the dopamine (DA) D1 agonist SKF 38393, the DA D2 agonist quinpirole, and the α2‐adrenoceptor agonist clonidine engendered saline responding. Furthermore, the D1 antagonist SCH 23390, the D2 antagonist sulpiride, and the putative 5‐HT1A antagonist spiroxatrine did not block or mimic the ipsapirone cue. This research suggests that catecholamine systems do not play a prominent role in mediating the stimulus properties of ipsapirone. Moreover, while the substitution profile for ipsapirone suggests that this novel anxiolytic may be a selective 5‐HT1A agonist, blockade of the ipsapirone cue by a 5‐HT1A antagonist remains to be established.
KW - 5‐HT receptors
KW - catecholamines
KW - drug discrimination
KW - ipsapirone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024371591&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024371591&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ddr.430160228
DO - 10.1002/ddr.430160228
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0024371591
SN - 0272-4391
VL - 16
SP - 345
EP - 353
JO - Drug Development Research
JF - Drug Development Research
IS - 2-4
ER -