Nonculture techniques for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia

Frances Valencia-Shelton, Michael Loeffelholz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bacteremia and fungemia account for a substantial proportion of all cases of severe sepsis. Antibiotic resistance is a contributing factor in many hospital-acquired infection deaths. Traditional phenotypic methods for the identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood cultures and determining antimicrobial susceptibility require 48-72 h, delaying optimal therapy and negatively impacting patient outcomes. Molecular methods, including nonamplified DNA probe panels and peptide nucleic acid probes, and nucleic acid amplification methods such as PCR, proteomic methods (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry) and direct biochemical tests provide more rapid identification of bacteria and fungi, and in some cases antimicrobial resistance markers, from positive blood cultures, as well as directly from whole blood. These methods vary in the breadth of organisms that they detect, and equally important, their ease of use. This article examines the principles, performance and practicality of the various rapid, nonculture techniques for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)543-559
Number of pages17
JournalFuture Microbiology
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Fungemia
Bacteremia
Nucleic Acid Probes
Peptide Nucleic Acids
Bacteria
DNA Probes
Microbial Drug Resistance
Cross Infection
Proteomics
Nucleic Acids
Mass Spectrometry
Sepsis
Lasers
Fungi
Yeasts
Polymerase Chain Reaction

Keywords

  • bacteremia
  • blood cultures
  • bloodstream infection
  • fungemia
  • MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
  • nucleic acid amplification
  • PCR

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Nonculture techniques for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. / Valencia-Shelton, Frances; Loeffelholz, Michael.

In: Future Microbiology, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2014, p. 543-559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Valencia-Shelton, Frances ; Loeffelholz, Michael. / Nonculture techniques for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. In: Future Microbiology. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 543-559.
@article{1261e3dcc54e49c3ab677e19eb1c28d1,
title = "Nonculture techniques for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia",
abstract = "Bacteremia and fungemia account for a substantial proportion of all cases of severe sepsis. Antibiotic resistance is a contributing factor in many hospital-acquired infection deaths. Traditional phenotypic methods for the identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood cultures and determining antimicrobial susceptibility require 48-72 h, delaying optimal therapy and negatively impacting patient outcomes. Molecular methods, including nonamplified DNA probe panels and peptide nucleic acid probes, and nucleic acid amplification methods such as PCR, proteomic methods (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry) and direct biochemical tests provide more rapid identification of bacteria and fungi, and in some cases antimicrobial resistance markers, from positive blood cultures, as well as directly from whole blood. These methods vary in the breadth of organisms that they detect, and equally important, their ease of use. This article examines the principles, performance and practicality of the various rapid, nonculture techniques for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.",
keywords = "bacteremia, blood cultures, bloodstream infection, fungemia, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, nucleic acid amplification, PCR",
author = "Frances Valencia-Shelton and Michael Loeffelholz",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.2217/fmb.14.8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "543--559",
journal = "Future Microbiology",
issn = "1746-0913",
publisher = "Future Medicine Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonculture techniques for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia

AU - Valencia-Shelton, Frances

AU - Loeffelholz, Michael

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Bacteremia and fungemia account for a substantial proportion of all cases of severe sepsis. Antibiotic resistance is a contributing factor in many hospital-acquired infection deaths. Traditional phenotypic methods for the identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood cultures and determining antimicrobial susceptibility require 48-72 h, delaying optimal therapy and negatively impacting patient outcomes. Molecular methods, including nonamplified DNA probe panels and peptide nucleic acid probes, and nucleic acid amplification methods such as PCR, proteomic methods (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry) and direct biochemical tests provide more rapid identification of bacteria and fungi, and in some cases antimicrobial resistance markers, from positive blood cultures, as well as directly from whole blood. These methods vary in the breadth of organisms that they detect, and equally important, their ease of use. This article examines the principles, performance and practicality of the various rapid, nonculture techniques for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

AB - Bacteremia and fungemia account for a substantial proportion of all cases of severe sepsis. Antibiotic resistance is a contributing factor in many hospital-acquired infection deaths. Traditional phenotypic methods for the identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood cultures and determining antimicrobial susceptibility require 48-72 h, delaying optimal therapy and negatively impacting patient outcomes. Molecular methods, including nonamplified DNA probe panels and peptide nucleic acid probes, and nucleic acid amplification methods such as PCR, proteomic methods (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry) and direct biochemical tests provide more rapid identification of bacteria and fungi, and in some cases antimicrobial resistance markers, from positive blood cultures, as well as directly from whole blood. These methods vary in the breadth of organisms that they detect, and equally important, their ease of use. This article examines the principles, performance and practicality of the various rapid, nonculture techniques for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

KW - bacteremia

KW - blood cultures

KW - bloodstream infection

KW - fungemia

KW - MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry

KW - nucleic acid amplification

KW - PCR

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900314249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900314249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2217/fmb.14.8

DO - 10.2217/fmb.14.8

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 543

EP - 559

JO - Future Microbiology

JF - Future Microbiology

SN - 1746-0913

IS - 4

ER -