Nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis colonic morphology and search for Entamoeba histolytica adherence and invasion

Easwaran P. Variyam, Prema Gogate, Mehdat Hassan, William J. Costerton, Shiv Pillai, Honorine Ward, Kamal Jalan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is controversy regarding the presence of colonic mucosal abnormalities or mucosal invasion by Entamoeba histolytica in patients with "nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis." To determine the role of E. histolytica in causing symptoms and mucosal changes and to detect if mucosal invasion by E. histolytica is present in nondynsenteric intestinal amebiasis, we evaluated 24 E. histolytica-infected patients (stool microscopy positive for E. histolytica)and 12 noninfected controls who presented with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms, but without dysentery, to a clinic in Calcutta. The colonic mucosa was evaluated at colonoscopy, and mucosal biopsies obtained from the cecum, sigmoid colon, and rectum were evaluated by light microscopy, indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. At colonoscopy mucosal ulcerations were absent in all the controls and all except one of the E. histolytica-infected patients. E. histolytica trophozoites or cysts were not seen in the lamina propria or on the luminal surface in any infected patient by light and immunofluorescence microscopy. On scanning electron microscopy, structures that resembled rounded E. histolytica trophozoites were seen on the luminal surface in two of 19 cecal specimens from the infected patients. Moderate or severe mucosal inflammation was frequent on light microscopy in both the E. histolytica -infected patients and the noninfected controls with the cecum involved in two thirds of both groups. Antibodies to E. histolytica were detected in serum of 25% of study patients and 58% of controls. Mucosal inflammation did not correlate with stool positivity for E. histolytica or seropositivity for ameba antibody. We conclude that in patients with "nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis," E. histolytica adherence to colonic mucosa is infrequent and that mucosal invasion by the organism is unlikely. Colonic mucosal inflammation is highly prevalent in patients with chronic lower abdominal symptoms in this tropical region, but the inflammation and symptoms are unrelated to E. histolytica infection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)732-740
Number of pages9
JournalDigestive Diseases and Sciences
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Amoebic Dysentery
Entamoeba histolytica
Inflammation
Microscopy
Trophozoites
Mucous Membrane
Cecum
Colonoscopy
Fluorescence Microscopy
Light
Electron Scanning Microscopy
Dysentery
Amoeba
Antibodies
Sigmoid Colon
Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Rectum

Keywords

  • amebiasis
  • Entamoeba histolytica
  • nonspecific colitis
  • tropical colonopathy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Variyam, E. P., Gogate, P., Hassan, M., Costerton, W. J., Pillai, S., Ward, H., & Jalan, K. (1989). Nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis colonic morphology and search for Entamoeba histolytica adherence and invasion. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 34(5), 732-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540345

Nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis colonic morphology and search for Entamoeba histolytica adherence and invasion. / Variyam, Easwaran P.; Gogate, Prema; Hassan, Mehdat; Costerton, William J.; Pillai, Shiv; Ward, Honorine; Jalan, Kamal.

In: Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 5, 05.1989, p. 732-740.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Variyam, EP, Gogate, P, Hassan, M, Costerton, WJ, Pillai, S, Ward, H & Jalan, K 1989, 'Nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis colonic morphology and search for Entamoeba histolytica adherence and invasion', Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 732-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01540345
Variyam, Easwaran P. ; Gogate, Prema ; Hassan, Mehdat ; Costerton, William J. ; Pillai, Shiv ; Ward, Honorine ; Jalan, Kamal. / Nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis colonic morphology and search for Entamoeba histolytica adherence and invasion. In: Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 1989 ; Vol. 34, No. 5. pp. 732-740.
@article{7e94aec9bacb4aa69ea09d36b6e27859,
title = "Nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis colonic morphology and search for Entamoeba histolytica adherence and invasion",
abstract = "There is controversy regarding the presence of colonic mucosal abnormalities or mucosal invasion by Entamoeba histolytica in patients with {"}nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis.{"} To determine the role of E. histolytica in causing symptoms and mucosal changes and to detect if mucosal invasion by E. histolytica is present in nondynsenteric intestinal amebiasis, we evaluated 24 E. histolytica-infected patients (stool microscopy positive for E. histolytica)and 12 noninfected controls who presented with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms, but without dysentery, to a clinic in Calcutta. The colonic mucosa was evaluated at colonoscopy, and mucosal biopsies obtained from the cecum, sigmoid colon, and rectum were evaluated by light microscopy, indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. At colonoscopy mucosal ulcerations were absent in all the controls and all except one of the E. histolytica-infected patients. E. histolytica trophozoites or cysts were not seen in the lamina propria or on the luminal surface in any infected patient by light and immunofluorescence microscopy. On scanning electron microscopy, structures that resembled rounded E. histolytica trophozoites were seen on the luminal surface in two of 19 cecal specimens from the infected patients. Moderate or severe mucosal inflammation was frequent on light microscopy in both the E. histolytica -infected patients and the noninfected controls with the cecum involved in two thirds of both groups. Antibodies to E. histolytica were detected in serum of 25{\%} of study patients and 58{\%} of controls. Mucosal inflammation did not correlate with stool positivity for E. histolytica or seropositivity for ameba antibody. We conclude that in patients with {"}nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis,{"} E. histolytica adherence to colonic mucosa is infrequent and that mucosal invasion by the organism is unlikely. Colonic mucosal inflammation is highly prevalent in patients with chronic lower abdominal symptoms in this tropical region, but the inflammation and symptoms are unrelated to E. histolytica infection.",
keywords = "amebiasis, Entamoeba histolytica, nonspecific colitis, tropical colonopathy",
author = "Variyam, {Easwaran P.} and Prema Gogate and Mehdat Hassan and Costerton, {William J.} and Shiv Pillai and Honorine Ward and Kamal Jalan",
year = "1989",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/BF01540345",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "732--740",
journal = "Digestive Diseases and Sciences",
issn = "0163-2116",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis colonic morphology and search for Entamoeba histolytica adherence and invasion

AU - Variyam, Easwaran P.

AU - Gogate, Prema

AU - Hassan, Mehdat

AU - Costerton, William J.

AU - Pillai, Shiv

AU - Ward, Honorine

AU - Jalan, Kamal

PY - 1989/5

Y1 - 1989/5

N2 - There is controversy regarding the presence of colonic mucosal abnormalities or mucosal invasion by Entamoeba histolytica in patients with "nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis." To determine the role of E. histolytica in causing symptoms and mucosal changes and to detect if mucosal invasion by E. histolytica is present in nondynsenteric intestinal amebiasis, we evaluated 24 E. histolytica-infected patients (stool microscopy positive for E. histolytica)and 12 noninfected controls who presented with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms, but without dysentery, to a clinic in Calcutta. The colonic mucosa was evaluated at colonoscopy, and mucosal biopsies obtained from the cecum, sigmoid colon, and rectum were evaluated by light microscopy, indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. At colonoscopy mucosal ulcerations were absent in all the controls and all except one of the E. histolytica-infected patients. E. histolytica trophozoites or cysts were not seen in the lamina propria or on the luminal surface in any infected patient by light and immunofluorescence microscopy. On scanning electron microscopy, structures that resembled rounded E. histolytica trophozoites were seen on the luminal surface in two of 19 cecal specimens from the infected patients. Moderate or severe mucosal inflammation was frequent on light microscopy in both the E. histolytica -infected patients and the noninfected controls with the cecum involved in two thirds of both groups. Antibodies to E. histolytica were detected in serum of 25% of study patients and 58% of controls. Mucosal inflammation did not correlate with stool positivity for E. histolytica or seropositivity for ameba antibody. We conclude that in patients with "nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis," E. histolytica adherence to colonic mucosa is infrequent and that mucosal invasion by the organism is unlikely. Colonic mucosal inflammation is highly prevalent in patients with chronic lower abdominal symptoms in this tropical region, but the inflammation and symptoms are unrelated to E. histolytica infection.

AB - There is controversy regarding the presence of colonic mucosal abnormalities or mucosal invasion by Entamoeba histolytica in patients with "nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis." To determine the role of E. histolytica in causing symptoms and mucosal changes and to detect if mucosal invasion by E. histolytica is present in nondynsenteric intestinal amebiasis, we evaluated 24 E. histolytica-infected patients (stool microscopy positive for E. histolytica)and 12 noninfected controls who presented with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms, but without dysentery, to a clinic in Calcutta. The colonic mucosa was evaluated at colonoscopy, and mucosal biopsies obtained from the cecum, sigmoid colon, and rectum were evaluated by light microscopy, indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. At colonoscopy mucosal ulcerations were absent in all the controls and all except one of the E. histolytica-infected patients. E. histolytica trophozoites or cysts were not seen in the lamina propria or on the luminal surface in any infected patient by light and immunofluorescence microscopy. On scanning electron microscopy, structures that resembled rounded E. histolytica trophozoites were seen on the luminal surface in two of 19 cecal specimens from the infected patients. Moderate or severe mucosal inflammation was frequent on light microscopy in both the E. histolytica -infected patients and the noninfected controls with the cecum involved in two thirds of both groups. Antibodies to E. histolytica were detected in serum of 25% of study patients and 58% of controls. Mucosal inflammation did not correlate with stool positivity for E. histolytica or seropositivity for ameba antibody. We conclude that in patients with "nondysenteric intestinal amebiasis," E. histolytica adherence to colonic mucosa is infrequent and that mucosal invasion by the organism is unlikely. Colonic mucosal inflammation is highly prevalent in patients with chronic lower abdominal symptoms in this tropical region, but the inflammation and symptoms are unrelated to E. histolytica infection.

KW - amebiasis

KW - Entamoeba histolytica

KW - nonspecific colitis

KW - tropical colonopathy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024334595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024334595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01540345

DO - 10.1007/BF01540345

M3 - Article

C2 - 2540942

AN - SCOPUS:0024334595

VL - 34

SP - 732

EP - 740

JO - Digestive Diseases and Sciences

JF - Digestive Diseases and Sciences

SN - 0163-2116

IS - 5

ER -