Note

On the universality of proximal radial distribution functions of proteins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Protein hydration is important to protein structure and function. Molecular distribution functions have been an invaluable tool to study protein hydration. Proximal radial distribution functions (pRDFs) have been postulated as being transferable across proteins based on evidence collected from two proteins V. A. Makarov, B. K. Andrews, and B. M. Pettitt, Biopolymers 45(7), 469 (1998). Here we selected nine proteins with different sizes as well as different secondary topologies. We show that pRDFs are universal for proteins with compact structures. We further compare these pRDFs with those calculated from polyglycines that have no defined structures to consider the extent of the validity of this approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number106101
JournalJournal of Chemical Physics
Volume134
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 14 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

radial distribution
Distribution functions
distribution functions
proteins
Proteins
Hydration
hydration
Biopolymers
biopolymers
topology
Topology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Note : On the universality of proximal radial distribution functions of proteins. / Lin, Bin; Pettitt, Bernard.

In: Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 134, No. 10, 106101, 14.03.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bb196bcfcf31418abf4127ec10c72dbc,
title = "Note: On the universality of proximal radial distribution functions of proteins",
abstract = "Protein hydration is important to protein structure and function. Molecular distribution functions have been an invaluable tool to study protein hydration. Proximal radial distribution functions (pRDFs) have been postulated as being transferable across proteins based on evidence collected from two proteins V. A. Makarov, B. K. Andrews, and B. M. Pettitt, Biopolymers 45(7), 469 (1998). Here we selected nine proteins with different sizes as well as different secondary topologies. We show that pRDFs are universal for proteins with compact structures. We further compare these pRDFs with those calculated from polyglycines that have no defined structures to consider the extent of the validity of this approach.",
author = "Bin Lin and Bernard Pettitt",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1063/1.3565035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "134",
journal = "Journal of Chemical Physics",
issn = "0021-9606",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Note

T2 - On the universality of proximal radial distribution functions of proteins

AU - Lin, Bin

AU - Pettitt, Bernard

PY - 2011/3/14

Y1 - 2011/3/14

N2 - Protein hydration is important to protein structure and function. Molecular distribution functions have been an invaluable tool to study protein hydration. Proximal radial distribution functions (pRDFs) have been postulated as being transferable across proteins based on evidence collected from two proteins V. A. Makarov, B. K. Andrews, and B. M. Pettitt, Biopolymers 45(7), 469 (1998). Here we selected nine proteins with different sizes as well as different secondary topologies. We show that pRDFs are universal for proteins with compact structures. We further compare these pRDFs with those calculated from polyglycines that have no defined structures to consider the extent of the validity of this approach.

AB - Protein hydration is important to protein structure and function. Molecular distribution functions have been an invaluable tool to study protein hydration. Proximal radial distribution functions (pRDFs) have been postulated as being transferable across proteins based on evidence collected from two proteins V. A. Makarov, B. K. Andrews, and B. M. Pettitt, Biopolymers 45(7), 469 (1998). Here we selected nine proteins with different sizes as well as different secondary topologies. We show that pRDFs are universal for proteins with compact structures. We further compare these pRDFs with those calculated from polyglycines that have no defined structures to consider the extent of the validity of this approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952657409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952657409&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.3565035

DO - 10.1063/1.3565035

M3 - Article

VL - 134

JO - Journal of Chemical Physics

JF - Journal of Chemical Physics

SN - 0021-9606

IS - 10

M1 - 106101

ER -