Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate - A population-based screening study

  • Joshua L. Weiss
  • , Fergal D. Malone
  • , Danielle Emig
  • , Robert H. Ball
  • , David A. Nyberg
  • , Christine H. Comstock
  • , George Saade
  • , Keith Eddleman
  • , Suzanne M. Carter
  • , Sabrina D. Craigo
  • , Stephen R. Carr
  • , Mary E. D'Alton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken to determine whether obesity is associated with obstetric complications and cesarean delivery. Methods: A large prospective multicenter database was studied. Subjects were divided into 3 groups: body mass index (BMI) less than 30 (control), 30 to 34.9 (obese), and 35 or greater (morbidly obese). Groups were compared by using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: The study included 16,102 patients: 3,752 control, 1,473 obese, and 877 morbidly obese patients. Obesity and morbid obesity had a statistically significant association with gestational hypertension (odds ratios [ORs] 2.5 and 3.2), preeclampsia (ORs 1.6 and 3.3), gestational diabetes (ORs 2.6 and 4.0), and fetal birth weight greater than 4000 g (ORs 1.7 and 1.9) and greater than 4500 g (ORs 2.0 and 2.4). For nulliparous patients, the cesarean delivery rate was 20.7% for the control group, 33.8% for obese, and 47.4% for morbidly obese patients. Conclusion: Obesity is an independent risk factor for adverse obstetric outcome and is significantly associated with an increased cesarean delivery rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1091-1097
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Volume190
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cesarean delivery
  • Morbid obesity
  • Obesity
  • Pregnancy complications

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate - A population-based screening study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this