Operational Advantages of Enteral Resuscitation Following Burn Injury in Resource-Poor Environments: Palatability of Commercially Available Solutions

David M. Burmeister, Joshua S. Little, Belinda I. Gomez, Jennifer Gurney, Tony Chao, Leopoldo C. Cancio, George C. Kramer, Michael A. Dubick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent combat operations, 5% to 15% of casualties sustained thermal injuries, which require resource-intensive therapies. During prolonged field care or when caring for patients in a multidomain battlefield, delayed transport will complicate the challenges that already exist in the burn population. A lack of resources and/or vascular access in the future operating environment may benefit from alternative resuscitation strategies. The objectives of the current report are 1) to briefly review actual and potential advantages/caveats of resuscitation with enteral fluids and 2) to present new data on palatability of oral rehydration solutions. METHODS: A review of the literature and published guidelines are reported. In addition, enlisted US military active duty Servicemembers (N = 40) were asked to taste/rank five different oral rehydration solutions on several parameters. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: There are several operational advantages of using enteral fluids including ease of administration, no specialized equipment needed, and the use of lightweight sachets that are easily reconstituted/ administered. Limited clinical data along with slightly more extensive preclinical studies have prompted published guidelines for austere conditions to indicate consideration of enteral resuscitation for burns. Gatorade® and Drip-Drop® were the overall preferred rehydration solutions based on palatability, with the latter potentially more appropriate for resuscitation. Taken together, enteral resuscitation may confer several advantages over intravenous fluids for burn resuscitation under resource-poor scenarios. Future research needs to identify what solutions and volumes are optimal for use in thermally injured casualties.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)76-81
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals
Volume19
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Resuscitation
Small Intestine
Rehydration Solutions
Wounds and Injuries
Fluid Therapy
Guidelines
Burns
Blood Vessels
Hot Temperature
Equipment and Supplies
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Operational Advantages of Enteral Resuscitation Following Burn Injury in Resource-Poor Environments : Palatability of Commercially Available Solutions. / Burmeister, David M.; Little, Joshua S.; Gomez, Belinda I.; Gurney, Jennifer; Chao, Tony; Cancio, Leopoldo C.; Kramer, George C.; Dubick, Michael A.

In: Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.09.2019, p. 76-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burmeister, David M. ; Little, Joshua S. ; Gomez, Belinda I. ; Gurney, Jennifer ; Chao, Tony ; Cancio, Leopoldo C. ; Kramer, George C. ; Dubick, Michael A. / Operational Advantages of Enteral Resuscitation Following Burn Injury in Resource-Poor Environments : Palatability of Commercially Available Solutions. In: Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals. 2019 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 76-81.
@article{0bd81c12cb5a4fa097b23979a41aeecd,
title = "Operational Advantages of Enteral Resuscitation Following Burn Injury in Resource-Poor Environments: Palatability of Commercially Available Solutions",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In recent combat operations, 5{\%} to 15{\%} of casualties sustained thermal injuries, which require resource-intensive therapies. During prolonged field care or when caring for patients in a multidomain battlefield, delayed transport will complicate the challenges that already exist in the burn population. A lack of resources and/or vascular access in the future operating environment may benefit from alternative resuscitation strategies. The objectives of the current report are 1) to briefly review actual and potential advantages/caveats of resuscitation with enteral fluids and 2) to present new data on palatability of oral rehydration solutions. METHODS: A review of the literature and published guidelines are reported. In addition, enlisted US military active duty Servicemembers (N = 40) were asked to taste/rank five different oral rehydration solutions on several parameters. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: There are several operational advantages of using enteral fluids including ease of administration, no specialized equipment needed, and the use of lightweight sachets that are easily reconstituted/ administered. Limited clinical data along with slightly more extensive preclinical studies have prompted published guidelines for austere conditions to indicate consideration of enteral resuscitation for burns. Gatorade{\circledR} and Drip-Drop{\circledR} were the overall preferred rehydration solutions based on palatability, with the latter potentially more appropriate for resuscitation. Taken together, enteral resuscitation may confer several advantages over intravenous fluids for burn resuscitation under resource-poor scenarios. Future research needs to identify what solutions and volumes are optimal for use in thermally injured casualties.",
author = "Burmeister, {David M.} and Little, {Joshua S.} and Gomez, {Belinda I.} and Jennifer Gurney and Tony Chao and Cancio, {Leopoldo C.} and Kramer, {George C.} and Dubick, {Michael A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "76--81",
journal = "Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals",
issn = "1553-9768",
publisher = "U.S. Special Operations Command",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Operational Advantages of Enteral Resuscitation Following Burn Injury in Resource-Poor Environments

T2 - Palatability of Commercially Available Solutions

AU - Burmeister, David M.

AU - Little, Joshua S.

AU - Gomez, Belinda I.

AU - Gurney, Jennifer

AU - Chao, Tony

AU - Cancio, Leopoldo C.

AU - Kramer, George C.

AU - Dubick, Michael A.

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: In recent combat operations, 5% to 15% of casualties sustained thermal injuries, which require resource-intensive therapies. During prolonged field care or when caring for patients in a multidomain battlefield, delayed transport will complicate the challenges that already exist in the burn population. A lack of resources and/or vascular access in the future operating environment may benefit from alternative resuscitation strategies. The objectives of the current report are 1) to briefly review actual and potential advantages/caveats of resuscitation with enteral fluids and 2) to present new data on palatability of oral rehydration solutions. METHODS: A review of the literature and published guidelines are reported. In addition, enlisted US military active duty Servicemembers (N = 40) were asked to taste/rank five different oral rehydration solutions on several parameters. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: There are several operational advantages of using enteral fluids including ease of administration, no specialized equipment needed, and the use of lightweight sachets that are easily reconstituted/ administered. Limited clinical data along with slightly more extensive preclinical studies have prompted published guidelines for austere conditions to indicate consideration of enteral resuscitation for burns. Gatorade® and Drip-Drop® were the overall preferred rehydration solutions based on palatability, with the latter potentially more appropriate for resuscitation. Taken together, enteral resuscitation may confer several advantages over intravenous fluids for burn resuscitation under resource-poor scenarios. Future research needs to identify what solutions and volumes are optimal for use in thermally injured casualties.

AB - BACKGROUND: In recent combat operations, 5% to 15% of casualties sustained thermal injuries, which require resource-intensive therapies. During prolonged field care or when caring for patients in a multidomain battlefield, delayed transport will complicate the challenges that already exist in the burn population. A lack of resources and/or vascular access in the future operating environment may benefit from alternative resuscitation strategies. The objectives of the current report are 1) to briefly review actual and potential advantages/caveats of resuscitation with enteral fluids and 2) to present new data on palatability of oral rehydration solutions. METHODS: A review of the literature and published guidelines are reported. In addition, enlisted US military active duty Servicemembers (N = 40) were asked to taste/rank five different oral rehydration solutions on several parameters. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: There are several operational advantages of using enteral fluids including ease of administration, no specialized equipment needed, and the use of lightweight sachets that are easily reconstituted/ administered. Limited clinical data along with slightly more extensive preclinical studies have prompted published guidelines for austere conditions to indicate consideration of enteral resuscitation for burns. Gatorade® and Drip-Drop® were the overall preferred rehydration solutions based on palatability, with the latter potentially more appropriate for resuscitation. Taken together, enteral resuscitation may confer several advantages over intravenous fluids for burn resuscitation under resource-poor scenarios. Future research needs to identify what solutions and volumes are optimal for use in thermally injured casualties.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072513933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072513933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 31539437

AN - SCOPUS:85072513933

VL - 19

SP - 76

EP - 81

JO - Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals

JF - Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals

SN - 1553-9768

IS - 3

ER -