Optimal technique to diagnose primary ciliary dyskinesia

Norman R. Friedman, Ravi Pachigolla, Ronald W. Deskin, Hal K. Hawkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To develop a cost-effective protocol for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). Study Design: Retrospective chart review in a tertiary care academic medical center. Methods: A review of the electron microscopy logbook identified all patients who had a suspected diagnosis of PCD. Biopsy of respiratory tract mucosa was performed using a cytology brush or a cup forceps in the outpatient clinic or operating room (OR). Outcome measures were to determine the diagnostic adequacy of cytological evaluation compared with tissue biopsy and to determine whether an adequate nasal mucosa sample can be collected in the outpatient clinic setting as compared with the OR and the use of general anesthesia. Results: Twenty-seven patients underwent 31 biopsies. Fifteen specimens were collected with a cup forceps, and 16 with a cytology brush. The sampling sites were nasal mucosa in 28 cases and trachea in the rest. Twelve specimens (39%) were collected in the clinic; the rest were obtained in the OR in conjunction with another procedure. Neither method of specimen collection nor mode of anesthesia made a significant difference in the probability of obtaining an adequate specimen. Ten samples were nondiagnostic: cytological evaluation, 31% (n = 16); tissue biopsy, 27% (n = 15); clinic, 42% (n = 12); and OR, 31% (n = 16). The cost of evaluating ciliary motion at our institution was $150, with an additional charge of $1297 for electron microscopic evaluation. The nonprofessional fee for an outpatient nasal biopsy was $98; in the OR the cost of anesthesia supplies, surgical suite, recovery room, and day-surgery bed was at least $1860. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the optimal method for diagnosis of PCD is in the outpatient clinic with specimen collection by means of either a cup forceps or a cytology brush.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1548-1551
Number of pages4
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume110
Issue number9
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Kartagener Syndrome
Operating Rooms
Biopsy
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Surgical Instruments
Specimen Handling
Cell Biology
Nasal Mucosa
Costs and Cost Analysis
Anesthesia
Recovery Room
Respiratory Mucosa
Fees and Charges
Tertiary Healthcare
Trachea
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Nose
Respiratory System
General Anesthesia
Electron Microscopy

Keywords

  • Cost analysis
  • Cytology
  • Immotile cilia syndrome
  • Primary ciliary dyskinesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Friedman, N. R., Pachigolla, R., Deskin, R. W., & Hawkins, H. K. (2000). Optimal technique to diagnose primary ciliary dyskinesia. Laryngoscope, 110(9), 1548-1551.

Optimal technique to diagnose primary ciliary dyskinesia. / Friedman, Norman R.; Pachigolla, Ravi; Deskin, Ronald W.; Hawkins, Hal K.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 110, No. 9, 2000, p. 1548-1551.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Friedman, NR, Pachigolla, R, Deskin, RW & Hawkins, HK 2000, 'Optimal technique to diagnose primary ciliary dyskinesia', Laryngoscope, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1548-1551.
Friedman NR, Pachigolla R, Deskin RW, Hawkins HK. Optimal technique to diagnose primary ciliary dyskinesia. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(9):1548-1551.
Friedman, Norman R. ; Pachigolla, Ravi ; Deskin, Ronald W. ; Hawkins, Hal K. / Optimal technique to diagnose primary ciliary dyskinesia. In: Laryngoscope. 2000 ; Vol. 110, No. 9. pp. 1548-1551.
@article{fa63c3b1adc7435b8e894309e4081c88,
title = "Optimal technique to diagnose primary ciliary dyskinesia",
abstract = "Objective: To develop a cost-effective protocol for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). Study Design: Retrospective chart review in a tertiary care academic medical center. Methods: A review of the electron microscopy logbook identified all patients who had a suspected diagnosis of PCD. Biopsy of respiratory tract mucosa was performed using a cytology brush or a cup forceps in the outpatient clinic or operating room (OR). Outcome measures were to determine the diagnostic adequacy of cytological evaluation compared with tissue biopsy and to determine whether an adequate nasal mucosa sample can be collected in the outpatient clinic setting as compared with the OR and the use of general anesthesia. Results: Twenty-seven patients underwent 31 biopsies. Fifteen specimens were collected with a cup forceps, and 16 with a cytology brush. The sampling sites were nasal mucosa in 28 cases and trachea in the rest. Twelve specimens (39{\%}) were collected in the clinic; the rest were obtained in the OR in conjunction with another procedure. Neither method of specimen collection nor mode of anesthesia made a significant difference in the probability of obtaining an adequate specimen. Ten samples were nondiagnostic: cytological evaluation, 31{\%} (n = 16); tissue biopsy, 27{\%} (n = 15); clinic, 42{\%} (n = 12); and OR, 31{\%} (n = 16). The cost of evaluating ciliary motion at our institution was $150, with an additional charge of $1297 for electron microscopic evaluation. The nonprofessional fee for an outpatient nasal biopsy was $98; in the OR the cost of anesthesia supplies, surgical suite, recovery room, and day-surgery bed was at least $1860. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the optimal method for diagnosis of PCD is in the outpatient clinic with specimen collection by means of either a cup forceps or a cytology brush.",
keywords = "Cost analysis, Cytology, Immotile cilia syndrome, Primary ciliary dyskinesia",
author = "Friedman, {Norman R.} and Ravi Pachigolla and Deskin, {Ronald W.} and Hawkins, {Hal K.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "1548--1551",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal technique to diagnose primary ciliary dyskinesia

AU - Friedman, Norman R.

AU - Pachigolla, Ravi

AU - Deskin, Ronald W.

AU - Hawkins, Hal K.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Objective: To develop a cost-effective protocol for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). Study Design: Retrospective chart review in a tertiary care academic medical center. Methods: A review of the electron microscopy logbook identified all patients who had a suspected diagnosis of PCD. Biopsy of respiratory tract mucosa was performed using a cytology brush or a cup forceps in the outpatient clinic or operating room (OR). Outcome measures were to determine the diagnostic adequacy of cytological evaluation compared with tissue biopsy and to determine whether an adequate nasal mucosa sample can be collected in the outpatient clinic setting as compared with the OR and the use of general anesthesia. Results: Twenty-seven patients underwent 31 biopsies. Fifteen specimens were collected with a cup forceps, and 16 with a cytology brush. The sampling sites were nasal mucosa in 28 cases and trachea in the rest. Twelve specimens (39%) were collected in the clinic; the rest were obtained in the OR in conjunction with another procedure. Neither method of specimen collection nor mode of anesthesia made a significant difference in the probability of obtaining an adequate specimen. Ten samples were nondiagnostic: cytological evaluation, 31% (n = 16); tissue biopsy, 27% (n = 15); clinic, 42% (n = 12); and OR, 31% (n = 16). The cost of evaluating ciliary motion at our institution was $150, with an additional charge of $1297 for electron microscopic evaluation. The nonprofessional fee for an outpatient nasal biopsy was $98; in the OR the cost of anesthesia supplies, surgical suite, recovery room, and day-surgery bed was at least $1860. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the optimal method for diagnosis of PCD is in the outpatient clinic with specimen collection by means of either a cup forceps or a cytology brush.

AB - Objective: To develop a cost-effective protocol for diagnosing primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). Study Design: Retrospective chart review in a tertiary care academic medical center. Methods: A review of the electron microscopy logbook identified all patients who had a suspected diagnosis of PCD. Biopsy of respiratory tract mucosa was performed using a cytology brush or a cup forceps in the outpatient clinic or operating room (OR). Outcome measures were to determine the diagnostic adequacy of cytological evaluation compared with tissue biopsy and to determine whether an adequate nasal mucosa sample can be collected in the outpatient clinic setting as compared with the OR and the use of general anesthesia. Results: Twenty-seven patients underwent 31 biopsies. Fifteen specimens were collected with a cup forceps, and 16 with a cytology brush. The sampling sites were nasal mucosa in 28 cases and trachea in the rest. Twelve specimens (39%) were collected in the clinic; the rest were obtained in the OR in conjunction with another procedure. Neither method of specimen collection nor mode of anesthesia made a significant difference in the probability of obtaining an adequate specimen. Ten samples were nondiagnostic: cytological evaluation, 31% (n = 16); tissue biopsy, 27% (n = 15); clinic, 42% (n = 12); and OR, 31% (n = 16). The cost of evaluating ciliary motion at our institution was $150, with an additional charge of $1297 for electron microscopic evaluation. The nonprofessional fee for an outpatient nasal biopsy was $98; in the OR the cost of anesthesia supplies, surgical suite, recovery room, and day-surgery bed was at least $1860. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the optimal method for diagnosis of PCD is in the outpatient clinic with specimen collection by means of either a cup forceps or a cytology brush.

KW - Cost analysis

KW - Cytology

KW - Immotile cilia syndrome

KW - Primary ciliary dyskinesia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033817638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033817638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10983959

AN - SCOPUS:0033817638

VL - 110

SP - 1548

EP - 1551

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 9

ER -