Orthopaedic In-Training Examination Resources and Residency Training for the Foot and Ankle Domain

Cory F. Janney, Daniel Kunzler, Pejma Shazadeh Safavi, Vinod Panchbhavi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background. Residency programs use the annual Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) prepared by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) to monitor resident progress and prepare them for the part 1 of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgeons (ABOS) Certifying Examination. The purpose of this study was to determine resources residents currently use to prepare for the OITE and also to learn about their perception of training they receive in the foot and ankle subspecialty in their program and their interest in foot and ankle fellowship after residency. Methods. An anonymous survey was sent to both allopathic programs and osteopathic residents to learn what resources residents used to study for the OITE, preparatory question sets, on-call resources, their perception on training received in foot and ankle surgery, and their intent to pursue fellowship training. Results. A total of 130 residents participated in the survey. The majority of residents in allopathic and osteopathic residencies used Orthobullets (OB) to prepare for the OITE and use this resource while on-call. Most residents also used OB question sets to study along with the AAOS self-assessment examinations. In total, 43.2% of osteopathic residents felt they did not get enough exposure to foot and ankle subspecialty while in training, in contrast to 31.2% of allopathic residents. A total of 35% of all orthopaedic surgery residents felt they lacked enough exposure to foot and ankle orthopaedic surgery. Only 7 residents (6%, 6 allopathic, 1 osteopathic) intended to pursue a foot and ankle fellowship following graduation. Conclusion. Online resources such as OB continue to be frequently used by residents for preparation for the OITE. Greater than one-third of orthopaedic residents feel they do not get enough exposure to foot and ankle orthopaedic surgery. Improvement in this area could be helped by continued endeavors from the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society such as the Visiting Professor Program and Resident Scholarship Program. Levels of Evidence: Level V: Single Cross-Sectional Study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)146-152
Number of pages7
JournalFoot and Ankle Specialist
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Ankle
Orthopedics
Foot
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • lower limb orthopedics
  • orthopaedics
  • resident education
  • technological learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Podiatry
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Orthopaedic In-Training Examination Resources and Residency Training for the Foot and Ankle Domain. / Janney, Cory F.; Kunzler, Daniel; Safavi, Pejma Shazadeh; Panchbhavi, Vinod.

In: Foot and Ankle Specialist, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.04.2019, p. 146-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Janney, Cory F. ; Kunzler, Daniel ; Safavi, Pejma Shazadeh ; Panchbhavi, Vinod. / Orthopaedic In-Training Examination Resources and Residency Training for the Foot and Ankle Domain. In: Foot and Ankle Specialist. 2019 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 146-152.
@article{4fe90a49478842a0b0e63b70be99cb9b,
title = "Orthopaedic In-Training Examination Resources and Residency Training for the Foot and Ankle Domain",
abstract = "Background. Residency programs use the annual Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) prepared by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) to monitor resident progress and prepare them for the part 1 of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgeons (ABOS) Certifying Examination. The purpose of this study was to determine resources residents currently use to prepare for the OITE and also to learn about their perception of training they receive in the foot and ankle subspecialty in their program and their interest in foot and ankle fellowship after residency. Methods. An anonymous survey was sent to both allopathic programs and osteopathic residents to learn what resources residents used to study for the OITE, preparatory question sets, on-call resources, their perception on training received in foot and ankle surgery, and their intent to pursue fellowship training. Results. A total of 130 residents participated in the survey. The majority of residents in allopathic and osteopathic residencies used Orthobullets (OB) to prepare for the OITE and use this resource while on-call. Most residents also used OB question sets to study along with the AAOS self-assessment examinations. In total, 43.2{\%} of osteopathic residents felt they did not get enough exposure to foot and ankle subspecialty while in training, in contrast to 31.2{\%} of allopathic residents. A total of 35{\%} of all orthopaedic surgery residents felt they lacked enough exposure to foot and ankle orthopaedic surgery. Only 7 residents (6{\%}, 6 allopathic, 1 osteopathic) intended to pursue a foot and ankle fellowship following graduation. Conclusion. Online resources such as OB continue to be frequently used by residents for preparation for the OITE. Greater than one-third of orthopaedic residents feel they do not get enough exposure to foot and ankle orthopaedic surgery. Improvement in this area could be helped by continued endeavors from the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society such as the Visiting Professor Program and Resident Scholarship Program. Levels of Evidence: Level V: Single Cross-Sectional Study.",
keywords = "lower limb orthopedics, orthopaedics, resident education, technological learning",
author = "Janney, {Cory F.} and Daniel Kunzler and Safavi, {Pejma Shazadeh} and Vinod Panchbhavi",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1938640018770808",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "146--152",
journal = "Foot & ankle specialist",
issn = "1938-6400",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Orthopaedic In-Training Examination Resources and Residency Training for the Foot and Ankle Domain

AU - Janney, Cory F.

AU - Kunzler, Daniel

AU - Safavi, Pejma Shazadeh

AU - Panchbhavi, Vinod

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Background. Residency programs use the annual Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) prepared by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) to monitor resident progress and prepare them for the part 1 of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgeons (ABOS) Certifying Examination. The purpose of this study was to determine resources residents currently use to prepare for the OITE and also to learn about their perception of training they receive in the foot and ankle subspecialty in their program and their interest in foot and ankle fellowship after residency. Methods. An anonymous survey was sent to both allopathic programs and osteopathic residents to learn what resources residents used to study for the OITE, preparatory question sets, on-call resources, their perception on training received in foot and ankle surgery, and their intent to pursue fellowship training. Results. A total of 130 residents participated in the survey. The majority of residents in allopathic and osteopathic residencies used Orthobullets (OB) to prepare for the OITE and use this resource while on-call. Most residents also used OB question sets to study along with the AAOS self-assessment examinations. In total, 43.2% of osteopathic residents felt they did not get enough exposure to foot and ankle subspecialty while in training, in contrast to 31.2% of allopathic residents. A total of 35% of all orthopaedic surgery residents felt they lacked enough exposure to foot and ankle orthopaedic surgery. Only 7 residents (6%, 6 allopathic, 1 osteopathic) intended to pursue a foot and ankle fellowship following graduation. Conclusion. Online resources such as OB continue to be frequently used by residents for preparation for the OITE. Greater than one-third of orthopaedic residents feel they do not get enough exposure to foot and ankle orthopaedic surgery. Improvement in this area could be helped by continued endeavors from the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society such as the Visiting Professor Program and Resident Scholarship Program. Levels of Evidence: Level V: Single Cross-Sectional Study.

AB - Background. Residency programs use the annual Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) prepared by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) to monitor resident progress and prepare them for the part 1 of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgeons (ABOS) Certifying Examination. The purpose of this study was to determine resources residents currently use to prepare for the OITE and also to learn about their perception of training they receive in the foot and ankle subspecialty in their program and their interest in foot and ankle fellowship after residency. Methods. An anonymous survey was sent to both allopathic programs and osteopathic residents to learn what resources residents used to study for the OITE, preparatory question sets, on-call resources, their perception on training received in foot and ankle surgery, and their intent to pursue fellowship training. Results. A total of 130 residents participated in the survey. The majority of residents in allopathic and osteopathic residencies used Orthobullets (OB) to prepare for the OITE and use this resource while on-call. Most residents also used OB question sets to study along with the AAOS self-assessment examinations. In total, 43.2% of osteopathic residents felt they did not get enough exposure to foot and ankle subspecialty while in training, in contrast to 31.2% of allopathic residents. A total of 35% of all orthopaedic surgery residents felt they lacked enough exposure to foot and ankle orthopaedic surgery. Only 7 residents (6%, 6 allopathic, 1 osteopathic) intended to pursue a foot and ankle fellowship following graduation. Conclusion. Online resources such as OB continue to be frequently used by residents for preparation for the OITE. Greater than one-third of orthopaedic residents feel they do not get enough exposure to foot and ankle orthopaedic surgery. Improvement in this area could be helped by continued endeavors from the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society such as the Visiting Professor Program and Resident Scholarship Program. Levels of Evidence: Level V: Single Cross-Sectional Study.

KW - lower limb orthopedics

KW - orthopaedics

KW - resident education

KW - technological learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065558432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065558432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1938640018770808

DO - 10.1177/1938640018770808

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 146

EP - 152

JO - Foot & ankle specialist

JF - Foot & ankle specialist

SN - 1938-6400

IS - 2

ER -