Outcome and cost analysis for outpatient skin grafting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To reduce cost, outpatient surgery is advocated when feasible; however, the potential of compromising outcome is a concern. The purpose of this review is to assess patient outcome and cost for managing operative burn injuries without hospitalization. Methods: During the past 18 months, 54 patients were identified with burns amenable to operative debridement and skin grafting without hospitalization. Twenty patients chose to be hospitalized and underwent prompt skin grafting. Operative skin grafting as an outpatient was chosen by the remaining 34 patients. Of these, four patients were subsequently hospitalized postoperatively (two for pain, one for cellulitis, and one for vomiting). Results: Hospitalized Patients and outpatients were similar in age and extent of burn; however, those hospitalized underwent skin grafting sooner after injury (2.1 ± 0.4 days for inpatients vs. 11.5 ± 0.8 days for outpatients; mean ± SEM). Inpatients also had a significantly larger area skin-grafted (286 ± 24 cm2 for inpatients vs. 178 ± 14 cm2 for outpatients). Graft take was very good in each group. Cost, as indexed by patient charge, was substantially less for outpatients ($2,397 ± $222] than for inpatients ($17,220 ± $410). Conclusion: These results demonstrate a significant cost reduction with nonhospitalized operative care of burn injuries without any overt detriment in outcome, thus endorsing outpatient skin grafting when amenable. This review also illustrates that delaying operative intervention reduces the burn area required for grafting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)597-602
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1997

Fingerprint

Skin Transplantation
Outpatients
Costs and Cost Analysis
Inpatients
Wounds and Injuries
Hospitalization
Cellulitis
Debridement
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Burns
Vomiting
Transplants
Pain
Skin

Keywords

  • Ambulatory surgery
  • Burns
  • Economies
  • Finance
  • Hospitalization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Outcome and cost analysis for outpatient skin grafting. / Gore, Dennis.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 43, No. 4, 10.1997, p. 597-602.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{67bd8331feea45798f37e9a6112e74df,
title = "Outcome and cost analysis for outpatient skin grafting",
abstract = "Background: To reduce cost, outpatient surgery is advocated when feasible; however, the potential of compromising outcome is a concern. The purpose of this review is to assess patient outcome and cost for managing operative burn injuries without hospitalization. Methods: During the past 18 months, 54 patients were identified with burns amenable to operative debridement and skin grafting without hospitalization. Twenty patients chose to be hospitalized and underwent prompt skin grafting. Operative skin grafting as an outpatient was chosen by the remaining 34 patients. Of these, four patients were subsequently hospitalized postoperatively (two for pain, one for cellulitis, and one for vomiting). Results: Hospitalized Patients and outpatients were similar in age and extent of burn; however, those hospitalized underwent skin grafting sooner after injury (2.1 ± 0.4 days for inpatients vs. 11.5 ± 0.8 days for outpatients; mean ± SEM). Inpatients also had a significantly larger area skin-grafted (286 ± 24 cm2 for inpatients vs. 178 ± 14 cm2 for outpatients). Graft take was very good in each group. Cost, as indexed by patient charge, was substantially less for outpatients ($2,397 ± $222] than for inpatients ($17,220 ± $410). Conclusion: These results demonstrate a significant cost reduction with nonhospitalized operative care of burn injuries without any overt detriment in outcome, thus endorsing outpatient skin grafting when amenable. This review also illustrates that delaying operative intervention reduces the burn area required for grafting.",
keywords = "Ambulatory surgery, Burns, Economies, Finance, Hospitalization",
author = "Dennis Gore",
year = "1997",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/00005373-199710000-00006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "597--602",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcome and cost analysis for outpatient skin grafting

AU - Gore, Dennis

PY - 1997/10

Y1 - 1997/10

N2 - Background: To reduce cost, outpatient surgery is advocated when feasible; however, the potential of compromising outcome is a concern. The purpose of this review is to assess patient outcome and cost for managing operative burn injuries without hospitalization. Methods: During the past 18 months, 54 patients were identified with burns amenable to operative debridement and skin grafting without hospitalization. Twenty patients chose to be hospitalized and underwent prompt skin grafting. Operative skin grafting as an outpatient was chosen by the remaining 34 patients. Of these, four patients were subsequently hospitalized postoperatively (two for pain, one for cellulitis, and one for vomiting). Results: Hospitalized Patients and outpatients were similar in age and extent of burn; however, those hospitalized underwent skin grafting sooner after injury (2.1 ± 0.4 days for inpatients vs. 11.5 ± 0.8 days for outpatients; mean ± SEM). Inpatients also had a significantly larger area skin-grafted (286 ± 24 cm2 for inpatients vs. 178 ± 14 cm2 for outpatients). Graft take was very good in each group. Cost, as indexed by patient charge, was substantially less for outpatients ($2,397 ± $222] than for inpatients ($17,220 ± $410). Conclusion: These results demonstrate a significant cost reduction with nonhospitalized operative care of burn injuries without any overt detriment in outcome, thus endorsing outpatient skin grafting when amenable. This review also illustrates that delaying operative intervention reduces the burn area required for grafting.

AB - Background: To reduce cost, outpatient surgery is advocated when feasible; however, the potential of compromising outcome is a concern. The purpose of this review is to assess patient outcome and cost for managing operative burn injuries without hospitalization. Methods: During the past 18 months, 54 patients were identified with burns amenable to operative debridement and skin grafting without hospitalization. Twenty patients chose to be hospitalized and underwent prompt skin grafting. Operative skin grafting as an outpatient was chosen by the remaining 34 patients. Of these, four patients were subsequently hospitalized postoperatively (two for pain, one for cellulitis, and one for vomiting). Results: Hospitalized Patients and outpatients were similar in age and extent of burn; however, those hospitalized underwent skin grafting sooner after injury (2.1 ± 0.4 days for inpatients vs. 11.5 ± 0.8 days for outpatients; mean ± SEM). Inpatients also had a significantly larger area skin-grafted (286 ± 24 cm2 for inpatients vs. 178 ± 14 cm2 for outpatients). Graft take was very good in each group. Cost, as indexed by patient charge, was substantially less for outpatients ($2,397 ± $222] than for inpatients ($17,220 ± $410). Conclusion: These results demonstrate a significant cost reduction with nonhospitalized operative care of burn injuries without any overt detriment in outcome, thus endorsing outpatient skin grafting when amenable. This review also illustrates that delaying operative intervention reduces the burn area required for grafting.

KW - Ambulatory surgery

KW - Burns

KW - Economies

KW - Finance

KW - Hospitalization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030711607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030711607&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005373-199710000-00006

DO - 10.1097/00005373-199710000-00006

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 597

EP - 602

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 4

ER -