Outcome measure to assess head-down bed rest subject performance

Julia M P Poritz, Kimberly A. Seaton, Susana B. Zanello, Ronita L. Cromwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present study was to develop an objective outcome measure to assess the performance of head-down bed rest subjects. The rationale behind the development was that the current outcome measure is subjective and dependent upon how much the clinical psychologist knows about subject behaviors during the study to rate them accurately. Methods: The behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) were developed through the use of the critical incident technique, along with traditional BARS development procedures, and the use of focus groups. Results: Use of these methodologies yielded 86 usable critical incidents, which were used as anchors for the scales. Discussion: Further research will be necessary to determine whether or not associations exist between data from the BARS and psychological screening data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)691-695
Number of pages5
JournalAviation Space and Environmental Medicine
Volume83
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bed Rest
Head
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Psychology
Task Performance and Analysis
Focus Groups
Research

Keywords

  • Behaviorally anchored rating scales
  • Critical incident technique
  • Head-down tilt bed rest
  • Spaceflight analogue study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Outcome measure to assess head-down bed rest subject performance. / Poritz, Julia M P; Seaton, Kimberly A.; Zanello, Susana B.; Cromwell, Ronita L.

In: Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 83, No. 7, 07.2012, p. 691-695.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Poritz, Julia M P ; Seaton, Kimberly A. ; Zanello, Susana B. ; Cromwell, Ronita L. / Outcome measure to assess head-down bed rest subject performance. In: Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 83, No. 7. pp. 691-695.
@article{37d28567cf5941d2adc56acf0242d295,
title = "Outcome measure to assess head-down bed rest subject performance",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of the present study was to develop an objective outcome measure to assess the performance of head-down bed rest subjects. The rationale behind the development was that the current outcome measure is subjective and dependent upon how much the clinical psychologist knows about subject behaviors during the study to rate them accurately. Methods: The behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) were developed through the use of the critical incident technique, along with traditional BARS development procedures, and the use of focus groups. Results: Use of these methodologies yielded 86 usable critical incidents, which were used as anchors for the scales. Discussion: Further research will be necessary to determine whether or not associations exist between data from the BARS and psychological screening data.",
keywords = "Behaviorally anchored rating scales, Critical incident technique, Head-down tilt bed rest, Spaceflight analogue study",
author = "Poritz, {Julia M P} and Seaton, {Kimberly A.} and Zanello, {Susana B.} and Cromwell, {Ronita L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.3357/ASEM.3223.2012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "691--695",
journal = "Aerospace medicine and human performance",
issn = "2375-6314",
publisher = "Aerospace Medical Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcome measure to assess head-down bed rest subject performance

AU - Poritz, Julia M P

AU - Seaton, Kimberly A.

AU - Zanello, Susana B.

AU - Cromwell, Ronita L.

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Background: The purpose of the present study was to develop an objective outcome measure to assess the performance of head-down bed rest subjects. The rationale behind the development was that the current outcome measure is subjective and dependent upon how much the clinical psychologist knows about subject behaviors during the study to rate them accurately. Methods: The behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) were developed through the use of the critical incident technique, along with traditional BARS development procedures, and the use of focus groups. Results: Use of these methodologies yielded 86 usable critical incidents, which were used as anchors for the scales. Discussion: Further research will be necessary to determine whether or not associations exist between data from the BARS and psychological screening data.

AB - Background: The purpose of the present study was to develop an objective outcome measure to assess the performance of head-down bed rest subjects. The rationale behind the development was that the current outcome measure is subjective and dependent upon how much the clinical psychologist knows about subject behaviors during the study to rate them accurately. Methods: The behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) were developed through the use of the critical incident technique, along with traditional BARS development procedures, and the use of focus groups. Results: Use of these methodologies yielded 86 usable critical incidents, which were used as anchors for the scales. Discussion: Further research will be necessary to determine whether or not associations exist between data from the BARS and psychological screening data.

KW - Behaviorally anchored rating scales

KW - Critical incident technique

KW - Head-down tilt bed rest

KW - Spaceflight analogue study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864886122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864886122&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3357/ASEM.3223.2012

DO - 10.3357/ASEM.3223.2012

M3 - Article

C2 - 22779313

AN - SCOPUS:84864886122

VL - 83

SP - 691

EP - 695

JO - Aerospace medicine and human performance

JF - Aerospace medicine and human performance

SN - 2375-6314

IS - 7

ER -