Outcomes for Gestational Carriers Versus Traditional Surrogates in the United States

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the obstetric and procedural outcomes of traditional surrogates and gestational carriers. Materials and Methods: Participants included 222 women living in the United States who completed a brief online survey between November 2015 and February 2016. Differences between gestational carriers (n = 204) and traditional surrogates (n = 18) in demographic characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, and procedural outcomes were examined using chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests, and t-tests. Results: Out of 248 eligible respondents, 222 surveys were complete, for a response rate of 89.5%. Overall, obstetric outcomes were similar among gestational carriers and traditional surrogates. Traditional surrogates were more likely than gestational carriers to have a Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised score of 16 or higher (37.5% vs. 4.0%). Gestational carriers reported higher mean compensation ($27,162.80 vs. $17,070.07) and were more likely to travel over 400 miles (46.0% vs. 0.0%) than traditional surrogates. Conclusions: Procedural differences, but not differences in obstetric outcomes, emerged between gestational carriers and traditional surrogates. To ensure that both traditional surrogates and gestational carriers receive optimal medical care, it may be necessary to extend practice guidelines to ensure that traditional surrogates are offered the same level of care offered to gestational carriers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)640-645
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Women's Health
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Surrogate Mothers
Obstetrics
Pregnancy Outcome
Practice Guidelines
Epidemiologic Studies
Demography
Depression

Keywords

  • infertility
  • pregnancy
  • Surrogacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Outcomes for Gestational Carriers Versus Traditional Surrogates in the United States. / Fuchs, Erika; Berenson, Abbey.

In: Journal of Women's Health, Vol. 27, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 640-645.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{03972d71001240ddbe93b5feda3d8ccf,
title = "Outcomes for Gestational Carriers Versus Traditional Surrogates in the United States",
abstract = "Background: Little is known about the obstetric and procedural outcomes of traditional surrogates and gestational carriers. Materials and Methods: Participants included 222 women living in the United States who completed a brief online survey between November 2015 and February 2016. Differences between gestational carriers (n = 204) and traditional surrogates (n = 18) in demographic characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, and procedural outcomes were examined using chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests, and t-tests. Results: Out of 248 eligible respondents, 222 surveys were complete, for a response rate of 89.5{\%}. Overall, obstetric outcomes were similar among gestational carriers and traditional surrogates. Traditional surrogates were more likely than gestational carriers to have a Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised score of 16 or higher (37.5{\%} vs. 4.0{\%}). Gestational carriers reported higher mean compensation ($27,162.80 vs. $17,070.07) and were more likely to travel over 400 miles (46.0{\%} vs. 0.0{\%}) than traditional surrogates. Conclusions: Procedural differences, but not differences in obstetric outcomes, emerged between gestational carriers and traditional surrogates. To ensure that both traditional surrogates and gestational carriers receive optimal medical care, it may be necessary to extend practice guidelines to ensure that traditional surrogates are offered the same level of care offered to gestational carriers.",
keywords = "infertility, pregnancy, Surrogacy",
author = "Erika Fuchs and Abbey Berenson",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jwh.2017.6540",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "640--645",
journal = "Journal of Women's Health",
issn = "1540-9996",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes for Gestational Carriers Versus Traditional Surrogates in the United States

AU - Fuchs, Erika

AU - Berenson, Abbey

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Background: Little is known about the obstetric and procedural outcomes of traditional surrogates and gestational carriers. Materials and Methods: Participants included 222 women living in the United States who completed a brief online survey between November 2015 and February 2016. Differences between gestational carriers (n = 204) and traditional surrogates (n = 18) in demographic characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, and procedural outcomes were examined using chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests, and t-tests. Results: Out of 248 eligible respondents, 222 surveys were complete, for a response rate of 89.5%. Overall, obstetric outcomes were similar among gestational carriers and traditional surrogates. Traditional surrogates were more likely than gestational carriers to have a Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised score of 16 or higher (37.5% vs. 4.0%). Gestational carriers reported higher mean compensation ($27,162.80 vs. $17,070.07) and were more likely to travel over 400 miles (46.0% vs. 0.0%) than traditional surrogates. Conclusions: Procedural differences, but not differences in obstetric outcomes, emerged between gestational carriers and traditional surrogates. To ensure that both traditional surrogates and gestational carriers receive optimal medical care, it may be necessary to extend practice guidelines to ensure that traditional surrogates are offered the same level of care offered to gestational carriers.

AB - Background: Little is known about the obstetric and procedural outcomes of traditional surrogates and gestational carriers. Materials and Methods: Participants included 222 women living in the United States who completed a brief online survey between November 2015 and February 2016. Differences between gestational carriers (n = 204) and traditional surrogates (n = 18) in demographic characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, and procedural outcomes were examined using chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests, and t-tests. Results: Out of 248 eligible respondents, 222 surveys were complete, for a response rate of 89.5%. Overall, obstetric outcomes were similar among gestational carriers and traditional surrogates. Traditional surrogates were more likely than gestational carriers to have a Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised score of 16 or higher (37.5% vs. 4.0%). Gestational carriers reported higher mean compensation ($27,162.80 vs. $17,070.07) and were more likely to travel over 400 miles (46.0% vs. 0.0%) than traditional surrogates. Conclusions: Procedural differences, but not differences in obstetric outcomes, emerged between gestational carriers and traditional surrogates. To ensure that both traditional surrogates and gestational carriers receive optimal medical care, it may be necessary to extend practice guidelines to ensure that traditional surrogates are offered the same level of care offered to gestational carriers.

KW - infertility

KW - pregnancy

KW - Surrogacy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047433758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047433758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jwh.2017.6540

DO - 10.1089/jwh.2017.6540

M3 - Article

C2 - 29323605

AN - SCOPUS:85047433758

VL - 27

SP - 640

EP - 645

JO - Journal of Women's Health

JF - Journal of Women's Health

SN - 1540-9996

IS - 5

ER -