Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Younger and Older Patients: An Analysis of Nationwide Readmission Database

Hemalkumar Mehta, Byron D. Hughes, Eric Sieloff, Sneha O. Sura, Yong Shan, Deepak Adhikari, Anthony Senagore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Prior studies report safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. The study aimed to examine the impact of laparoscopic colectomy on 30-day readmissions, discharge destination, hospital length of stay, and cost in younger (19-65 years) and older adults (>65 years). Materials and Methods: We used the nationwide readmission database from 2013 to study adults undergoing elective colectomy. The outcomes were 30-day readmissions, discharge destination for the index hospitalization (routine, skilled nursing facility [SNF]/intermediate care facility [ICF], home healthcare), length of stay, and cost. Multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the association of laparoscopic colectomy on outcome; logistic regression for 30-day readmission, multinomial logistic regression for discharge destination, and linear regression for length of stay and cost. An interaction between age and colectomy approach was included, and all models controlled gender, income, insurance status, All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG), Elixhauser comorbidities, hospital bed size, ownership, and teaching status. Results: Of 79,581 colectomies, 40.2% were laparoscopic. Laparoscopic colectomy was more frequent in younger patients (41.9% versus 38.5%, p < .0001). Regardless of age, patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy were 20% less likely to be readmitted within 30 days (odds ratio [OR] 0.80, confidence interval [95% CI] 0.75-0.85). For postdischarge destination, laparoscopic colectomy offered higher benefits to younger patients (SNF/ICF: OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.36-0.49; home health: OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.30-0.35) than older patients (SNF/ICF: OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.47-0.54; home health: OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.55-0.62). Regardless of age, laparoscopic colectomy resulted in 1.46 days (p < .0001) shorter hospital stays compared to open colectomy. Laparoscopic colectomy had significantly lower cost compared to open approach, particularly in younger ($1,466) versus older ($632) patients. Conclusions: Laparoscopic colectomy is superior to an open approach, with fewer 30-day readmissions, fewer discharges to SNF/ICF or home health, shorter hospital stays, and less overall cost; younger patients benefit more than older patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)370-378
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Colectomy
Databases
Intermediate Care Facilities
Skilled Nursing Facilities
Length of Stay
Odds Ratio
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health
Hospital Bed Capacity
Logistic Models
Insurance Coverage
Hospital Costs
Ownership
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Comorbidity
Linear Models
Teaching
Hospitalization

Keywords

  • cost
  • discharge destination
  • laparoscopic colectomy
  • length of stay
  • readmissions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Younger and Older Patients : An Analysis of Nationwide Readmission Database. / Mehta, Hemalkumar; Hughes, Byron D.; Sieloff, Eric; Sura, Sneha O.; Shan, Yong; Adhikari, Deepak; Senagore, Anthony.

In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 370-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mehta, Hemalkumar ; Hughes, Byron D. ; Sieloff, Eric ; Sura, Sneha O. ; Shan, Yong ; Adhikari, Deepak ; Senagore, Anthony. / Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Younger and Older Patients : An Analysis of Nationwide Readmission Database. In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2018 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 370-378.
@article{0d621101be2f402e884386c57af3c760,
title = "Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Younger and Older Patients: An Analysis of Nationwide Readmission Database",
abstract = "Background: Prior studies report safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. The study aimed to examine the impact of laparoscopic colectomy on 30-day readmissions, discharge destination, hospital length of stay, and cost in younger (19-65 years) and older adults (>65 years). Materials and Methods: We used the nationwide readmission database from 2013 to study adults undergoing elective colectomy. The outcomes were 30-day readmissions, discharge destination for the index hospitalization (routine, skilled nursing facility [SNF]/intermediate care facility [ICF], home healthcare), length of stay, and cost. Multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the association of laparoscopic colectomy on outcome; logistic regression for 30-day readmission, multinomial logistic regression for discharge destination, and linear regression for length of stay and cost. An interaction between age and colectomy approach was included, and all models controlled gender, income, insurance status, All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG), Elixhauser comorbidities, hospital bed size, ownership, and teaching status. Results: Of 79,581 colectomies, 40.2{\%} were laparoscopic. Laparoscopic colectomy was more frequent in younger patients (41.9{\%} versus 38.5{\%}, p < .0001). Regardless of age, patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy were 20{\%} less likely to be readmitted within 30 days (odds ratio [OR] 0.80, confidence interval [95{\%} CI] 0.75-0.85). For postdischarge destination, laparoscopic colectomy offered higher benefits to younger patients (SNF/ICF: OR 0.42, 95{\%} CI 0.36-0.49; home health: OR 0.32, 95{\%} CI 0.30-0.35) than older patients (SNF/ICF: OR 0.50, 95{\%} CI 0.47-0.54; home health: OR 0.59, 95{\%} CI 0.55-0.62). Regardless of age, laparoscopic colectomy resulted in 1.46 days (p < .0001) shorter hospital stays compared to open colectomy. Laparoscopic colectomy had significantly lower cost compared to open approach, particularly in younger ($1,466) versus older ($632) patients. Conclusions: Laparoscopic colectomy is superior to an open approach, with fewer 30-day readmissions, fewer discharges to SNF/ICF or home health, shorter hospital stays, and less overall cost; younger patients benefit more than older patients.",
keywords = "cost, discharge destination, laparoscopic colectomy, length of stay, readmissions",
author = "Hemalkumar Mehta and Hughes, {Byron D.} and Eric Sieloff and Sura, {Sneha O.} and Yong Shan and Deepak Adhikari and Anthony Senagore",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/lap.2017.0521",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "370--378",
journal = "Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques",
issn = "1092-6429",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Younger and Older Patients

T2 - An Analysis of Nationwide Readmission Database

AU - Mehta, Hemalkumar

AU - Hughes, Byron D.

AU - Sieloff, Eric

AU - Sura, Sneha O.

AU - Shan, Yong

AU - Adhikari, Deepak

AU - Senagore, Anthony

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Background: Prior studies report safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. The study aimed to examine the impact of laparoscopic colectomy on 30-day readmissions, discharge destination, hospital length of stay, and cost in younger (19-65 years) and older adults (>65 years). Materials and Methods: We used the nationwide readmission database from 2013 to study adults undergoing elective colectomy. The outcomes were 30-day readmissions, discharge destination for the index hospitalization (routine, skilled nursing facility [SNF]/intermediate care facility [ICF], home healthcare), length of stay, and cost. Multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the association of laparoscopic colectomy on outcome; logistic regression for 30-day readmission, multinomial logistic regression for discharge destination, and linear regression for length of stay and cost. An interaction between age and colectomy approach was included, and all models controlled gender, income, insurance status, All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG), Elixhauser comorbidities, hospital bed size, ownership, and teaching status. Results: Of 79,581 colectomies, 40.2% were laparoscopic. Laparoscopic colectomy was more frequent in younger patients (41.9% versus 38.5%, p < .0001). Regardless of age, patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy were 20% less likely to be readmitted within 30 days (odds ratio [OR] 0.80, confidence interval [95% CI] 0.75-0.85). For postdischarge destination, laparoscopic colectomy offered higher benefits to younger patients (SNF/ICF: OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.36-0.49; home health: OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.30-0.35) than older patients (SNF/ICF: OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.47-0.54; home health: OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.55-0.62). Regardless of age, laparoscopic colectomy resulted in 1.46 days (p < .0001) shorter hospital stays compared to open colectomy. Laparoscopic colectomy had significantly lower cost compared to open approach, particularly in younger ($1,466) versus older ($632) patients. Conclusions: Laparoscopic colectomy is superior to an open approach, with fewer 30-day readmissions, fewer discharges to SNF/ICF or home health, shorter hospital stays, and less overall cost; younger patients benefit more than older patients.

AB - Background: Prior studies report safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. The study aimed to examine the impact of laparoscopic colectomy on 30-day readmissions, discharge destination, hospital length of stay, and cost in younger (19-65 years) and older adults (>65 years). Materials and Methods: We used the nationwide readmission database from 2013 to study adults undergoing elective colectomy. The outcomes were 30-day readmissions, discharge destination for the index hospitalization (routine, skilled nursing facility [SNF]/intermediate care facility [ICF], home healthcare), length of stay, and cost. Multivariable analyses were conducted to determine the association of laparoscopic colectomy on outcome; logistic regression for 30-day readmission, multinomial logistic regression for discharge destination, and linear regression for length of stay and cost. An interaction between age and colectomy approach was included, and all models controlled gender, income, insurance status, All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (APR-DRG), Elixhauser comorbidities, hospital bed size, ownership, and teaching status. Results: Of 79,581 colectomies, 40.2% were laparoscopic. Laparoscopic colectomy was more frequent in younger patients (41.9% versus 38.5%, p < .0001). Regardless of age, patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy were 20% less likely to be readmitted within 30 days (odds ratio [OR] 0.80, confidence interval [95% CI] 0.75-0.85). For postdischarge destination, laparoscopic colectomy offered higher benefits to younger patients (SNF/ICF: OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.36-0.49; home health: OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.30-0.35) than older patients (SNF/ICF: OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.47-0.54; home health: OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.55-0.62). Regardless of age, laparoscopic colectomy resulted in 1.46 days (p < .0001) shorter hospital stays compared to open colectomy. Laparoscopic colectomy had significantly lower cost compared to open approach, particularly in younger ($1,466) versus older ($632) patients. Conclusions: Laparoscopic colectomy is superior to an open approach, with fewer 30-day readmissions, fewer discharges to SNF/ICF or home health, shorter hospital stays, and less overall cost; younger patients benefit more than older patients.

KW - cost

KW - discharge destination

KW - laparoscopic colectomy

KW - length of stay

KW - readmissions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045301944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045301944&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/lap.2017.0521

DO - 10.1089/lap.2017.0521

M3 - Article

C2 - 29237139

AN - SCOPUS:85045301944

VL - 28

SP - 370

EP - 378

JO - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

JF - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

SN - 1092-6429

IS - 4

ER -