TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of patients on multiple vasoactive drugs for shock
AU - Prys-Picard, Curig O.
AU - Shah, Shiwan K.
AU - Williams, Brandie D.
AU - Cardenas, Victor
AU - Sharma, Gulshan
PY - 2013/7
Y1 - 2013/7
N2 - Introduction: Vasoactive drugs are routinely used in critically ill patients with shock to optimize the hemodynamic state while evaluating and treating potentially reversible causes. Limited data exist on the use of multiple vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit. We hypothesize that the use of 3 or more vasoactive drugs is associated with worse outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively examined the outcome in patients, at least 18 years of age, in whom 3 or more vasoactive drugs were administered simultaneously. We included patients admitted between November 2007 and August 2009. Vasoactive drugs included dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin. The primary end point was survival to hospital discharge. Results: Sixty-six patients received 3 or more vasoactive drugs simultaneously. Nine patients (14%) survived to ICU discharge and 6 patients (9%) survived to hospital discharge. There was a significant difference in mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score II between survivors (32.3 + 28.6) and nonsurvivors (72.1 + 30.4), P = .003. Five of the 6 survivors had an acute cardiac procedure, either percutaneous cardiac intervention or heart transplantation. The 1 patient with septic shock who survived had surgery for a bowel perforation. All patients who survived received inotropic therapy (dobutamine). None of the patients who received 4 or more vasoactive drugs survived. Conclusion: Patients requiring 3 or more vasoactive drugs rarely survive in the absence of an intervention aimed at correcting the underlying cause such as revascularization or source control surgery
AB - Introduction: Vasoactive drugs are routinely used in critically ill patients with shock to optimize the hemodynamic state while evaluating and treating potentially reversible causes. Limited data exist on the use of multiple vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit. We hypothesize that the use of 3 or more vasoactive drugs is associated with worse outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively examined the outcome in patients, at least 18 years of age, in whom 3 or more vasoactive drugs were administered simultaneously. We included patients admitted between November 2007 and August 2009. Vasoactive drugs included dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, phenylephrine, and vasopressin. The primary end point was survival to hospital discharge. Results: Sixty-six patients received 3 or more vasoactive drugs simultaneously. Nine patients (14%) survived to ICU discharge and 6 patients (9%) survived to hospital discharge. There was a significant difference in mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score II between survivors (32.3 + 28.6) and nonsurvivors (72.1 + 30.4), P = .003. Five of the 6 survivors had an acute cardiac procedure, either percutaneous cardiac intervention or heart transplantation. The 1 patient with septic shock who survived had surgery for a bowel perforation. All patients who survived received inotropic therapy (dobutamine). None of the patients who received 4 or more vasoactive drugs survived. Conclusion: Patients requiring 3 or more vasoactive drugs rarely survive in the absence of an intervention aimed at correcting the underlying cause such as revascularization or source control surgery
KW - inotropic agents
KW - outcomes assessment
KW - shock
KW - vasoactive drugs
KW - vasoconstrictor agents
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880377422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880377422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0885066612448738
DO - 10.1177/0885066612448738
M3 - Article
C2 - 22733722
AN - SCOPUS:84880377422
SN - 0885-0666
VL - 28
SP - 237
EP - 240
JO - Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
JF - Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
IS - 4
ER -