Outpatient robotic hysterectomy: Clinical outcomes and financial analysis of initial experience

Mostafa A. Borahay, Pooja Patel, Cemil Hakan Kilic, Gokhan Kilic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Robotic surgery is associated with several advantages but also high costs. This study evaluates clinical outcomes and financial feasibility of outpatient robotic hysterectomy. Methods: Retrospective cohort study (Class II-2) of patients who underwent robotic hysterectomy for benign conditions by the same surgeon (M.A.B.) at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA, during November 2010-February 2013. The study only included cases considered appropriate for outpatient management. Clinical outcomes and costs for patients discharged the same day (outpatients) were compared to those electively admitted (hospitalized). Results: Twenty-nine cases (14 outpatient and 15 hospitalized) were analysed. Demographic, pre-, peri- and postoperative characteristics and payer types were not different among the groups (p > 0.05). Outpatient hysterectomy was associated with $4968 hospital savings (p < 0.001), $410 payer savings (p = 0.775) and $4558 improvement in net profit/loss (p = 0.01). Conclusions: In well-selected patients, adopting a well-designed programme, outpatient robotic hysterectomy seems to be safe and financially feasible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)244-250
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Robotics
Hysterectomy
Outpatients
Costs
Profitability
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Demography

Keywords

  • Cost
  • Financial
  • Hysterectomy
  • Outcomes
  • Outpatient
  • Robotic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Biophysics
  • Surgery

Cite this

Outpatient robotic hysterectomy : Clinical outcomes and financial analysis of initial experience. / Borahay, Mostafa A.; Patel, Pooja; Kilic, Cemil Hakan; Kilic, Gokhan.

In: International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2014, p. 244-250.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{06b51974a298476c9caa382363d74a54,
title = "Outpatient robotic hysterectomy: Clinical outcomes and financial analysis of initial experience",
abstract = "Background: Robotic surgery is associated with several advantages but also high costs. This study evaluates clinical outcomes and financial feasibility of outpatient robotic hysterectomy. Methods: Retrospective cohort study (Class II-2) of patients who underwent robotic hysterectomy for benign conditions by the same surgeon (M.A.B.) at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA, during November 2010-February 2013. The study only included cases considered appropriate for outpatient management. Clinical outcomes and costs for patients discharged the same day (outpatients) were compared to those electively admitted (hospitalized). Results: Twenty-nine cases (14 outpatient and 15 hospitalized) were analysed. Demographic, pre-, peri- and postoperative characteristics and payer types were not different among the groups (p > 0.05). Outpatient hysterectomy was associated with $4968 hospital savings (p < 0.001), $410 payer savings (p = 0.775) and $4558 improvement in net profit/loss (p = 0.01). Conclusions: In well-selected patients, adopting a well-designed programme, outpatient robotic hysterectomy seems to be safe and financially feasible.",
keywords = "Cost, Financial, Hysterectomy, Outcomes, Outpatient, Robotic surgery",
author = "Borahay, {Mostafa A.} and Pooja Patel and Kilic, {Cemil Hakan} and Gokhan Kilic",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/rcs.1565",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "244--250",
journal = "International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery",
issn = "1478-596X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outpatient robotic hysterectomy

T2 - Clinical outcomes and financial analysis of initial experience

AU - Borahay, Mostafa A.

AU - Patel, Pooja

AU - Kilic, Cemil Hakan

AU - Kilic, Gokhan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Robotic surgery is associated with several advantages but also high costs. This study evaluates clinical outcomes and financial feasibility of outpatient robotic hysterectomy. Methods: Retrospective cohort study (Class II-2) of patients who underwent robotic hysterectomy for benign conditions by the same surgeon (M.A.B.) at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA, during November 2010-February 2013. The study only included cases considered appropriate for outpatient management. Clinical outcomes and costs for patients discharged the same day (outpatients) were compared to those electively admitted (hospitalized). Results: Twenty-nine cases (14 outpatient and 15 hospitalized) were analysed. Demographic, pre-, peri- and postoperative characteristics and payer types were not different among the groups (p > 0.05). Outpatient hysterectomy was associated with $4968 hospital savings (p < 0.001), $410 payer savings (p = 0.775) and $4558 improvement in net profit/loss (p = 0.01). Conclusions: In well-selected patients, adopting a well-designed programme, outpatient robotic hysterectomy seems to be safe and financially feasible.

AB - Background: Robotic surgery is associated with several advantages but also high costs. This study evaluates clinical outcomes and financial feasibility of outpatient robotic hysterectomy. Methods: Retrospective cohort study (Class II-2) of patients who underwent robotic hysterectomy for benign conditions by the same surgeon (M.A.B.) at the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA, during November 2010-February 2013. The study only included cases considered appropriate for outpatient management. Clinical outcomes and costs for patients discharged the same day (outpatients) were compared to those electively admitted (hospitalized). Results: Twenty-nine cases (14 outpatient and 15 hospitalized) were analysed. Demographic, pre-, peri- and postoperative characteristics and payer types were not different among the groups (p > 0.05). Outpatient hysterectomy was associated with $4968 hospital savings (p < 0.001), $410 payer savings (p = 0.775) and $4558 improvement in net profit/loss (p = 0.01). Conclusions: In well-selected patients, adopting a well-designed programme, outpatient robotic hysterectomy seems to be safe and financially feasible.

KW - Cost

KW - Financial

KW - Hysterectomy

KW - Outcomes

KW - Outpatient

KW - Robotic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901829580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901829580&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/rcs.1565

DO - 10.1002/rcs.1565

M3 - Article

C2 - 24391019

AN - SCOPUS:84901829580

VL - 10

SP - 244

EP - 250

JO - International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

JF - International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

SN - 1478-596X

IS - 2

ER -