Partial response and nonresponse to antidepressant therapy

Current approaches and treatment options

Robert M A Hirschfeld, Stuart A. Montgomery, Eugenio Aguglia, Mario Amore, Pedro L. Delgado, Markus Gastpar, Christopher Hawley, Siegfried Kasper, Michael Linden, Juan Massana, Julien Mendlewicz, Hans Jürgen Möller, Charles B. Nemeroff, Jerónimo Saiz, Pedro Such, Riccardo Torta, Marcio Versiani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

162 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Response to antidepressant drug therapy is less than optimal for a considerable proportion of depressed patients; at present, however, few data exist to guide their rational therapeutic management. This review describes general principles for the management of such patients. This review is the result of an expert roundtable meeting convened to review published clinical data and clinical experience and provide clinicians with evidence-based principles on the management of patients who fail to respond optimally to initial antidepressant therapy. Roundtable Findings: Failure to respond may be defined as a < 25% decrease on an accepted symptom rating scale such as the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) or the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) in a patient who has received an adequate dosage for 4 weeks. In these patients, a neuropharmacologic rationale exists to switch to an agent with a different mode of action or a dual action. Partial response may be defined as 6 to 8 weeks at an adequate dosage and 25% to 50% decrease in MADRS or HAM-D score. In these patients, dose escalation should be considered, followed by augmentation and switching strategies. For augmentation, knowledge of neuropharmacology may allow prediction of which second agent will potentiate or complement the action of the first agent; it may also permit the prediction of potential safety concerns. Conclusions of the Panel: On the basis of a review of the medical literature and clinical experience regarding patients with partial response or nonresponse to antidepressant drug therapy, it appears that simultaneous targeting of both the noradrenergic and serotonergic systems is one of the most effective augmentation strategies. Switching to an agent of a different class is probably optimal for those patients who fail to respond to first-line therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)826-837
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychiatry
Volume63
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 2002

Fingerprint

Antidepressive Agents
Therapeutics
Neuropharmacology
Drug Therapy
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Montgomery, S. A., Aguglia, E., Amore, M., Delgado, P. L., Gastpar, M., ... Versiani, M. (2002). Partial response and nonresponse to antidepressant therapy: Current approaches and treatment options. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 63(9), 826-837.

Partial response and nonresponse to antidepressant therapy : Current approaches and treatment options. / Hirschfeld, Robert M A; Montgomery, Stuart A.; Aguglia, Eugenio; Amore, Mario; Delgado, Pedro L.; Gastpar, Markus; Hawley, Christopher; Kasper, Siegfried; Linden, Michael; Massana, Juan; Mendlewicz, Julien; Möller, Hans Jürgen; Nemeroff, Charles B.; Saiz, Jerónimo; Such, Pedro; Torta, Riccardo; Versiani, Marcio.

In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 63, No. 9, 09.2002, p. 826-837.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hirschfeld, RMA, Montgomery, SA, Aguglia, E, Amore, M, Delgado, PL, Gastpar, M, Hawley, C, Kasper, S, Linden, M, Massana, J, Mendlewicz, J, Möller, HJ, Nemeroff, CB, Saiz, J, Such, P, Torta, R & Versiani, M 2002, 'Partial response and nonresponse to antidepressant therapy: Current approaches and treatment options', Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 826-837.
Hirschfeld RMA, Montgomery SA, Aguglia E, Amore M, Delgado PL, Gastpar M et al. Partial response and nonresponse to antidepressant therapy: Current approaches and treatment options. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;63(9):826-837.
Hirschfeld, Robert M A ; Montgomery, Stuart A. ; Aguglia, Eugenio ; Amore, Mario ; Delgado, Pedro L. ; Gastpar, Markus ; Hawley, Christopher ; Kasper, Siegfried ; Linden, Michael ; Massana, Juan ; Mendlewicz, Julien ; Möller, Hans Jürgen ; Nemeroff, Charles B. ; Saiz, Jerónimo ; Such, Pedro ; Torta, Riccardo ; Versiani, Marcio. / Partial response and nonresponse to antidepressant therapy : Current approaches and treatment options. In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2002 ; Vol. 63, No. 9. pp. 826-837.
@article{063908e644d748ca96d444ff47ea86d8,
title = "Partial response and nonresponse to antidepressant therapy: Current approaches and treatment options",
abstract = "Background: Response to antidepressant drug therapy is less than optimal for a considerable proportion of depressed patients; at present, however, few data exist to guide their rational therapeutic management. This review describes general principles for the management of such patients. This review is the result of an expert roundtable meeting convened to review published clinical data and clinical experience and provide clinicians with evidence-based principles on the management of patients who fail to respond optimally to initial antidepressant therapy. Roundtable Findings: Failure to respond may be defined as a < 25{\%} decrease on an accepted symptom rating scale such as the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) or the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) in a patient who has received an adequate dosage for 4 weeks. In these patients, a neuropharmacologic rationale exists to switch to an agent with a different mode of action or a dual action. Partial response may be defined as 6 to 8 weeks at an adequate dosage and 25{\%} to 50{\%} decrease in MADRS or HAM-D score. In these patients, dose escalation should be considered, followed by augmentation and switching strategies. For augmentation, knowledge of neuropharmacology may allow prediction of which second agent will potentiate or complement the action of the first agent; it may also permit the prediction of potential safety concerns. Conclusions of the Panel: On the basis of a review of the medical literature and clinical experience regarding patients with partial response or nonresponse to antidepressant drug therapy, it appears that simultaneous targeting of both the noradrenergic and serotonergic systems is one of the most effective augmentation strategies. Switching to an agent of a different class is probably optimal for those patients who fail to respond to first-line therapy.",
author = "Hirschfeld, {Robert M A} and Montgomery, {Stuart A.} and Eugenio Aguglia and Mario Amore and Delgado, {Pedro L.} and Markus Gastpar and Christopher Hawley and Siegfried Kasper and Michael Linden and Juan Massana and Julien Mendlewicz and M{\"o}ller, {Hans J{\"u}rgen} and Nemeroff, {Charles B.} and Jer{\'o}nimo Saiz and Pedro Such and Riccardo Torta and Marcio Versiani",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "826--837",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Psychiatry",
issn = "0160-6689",
publisher = "Physicians Postgraduate Press Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partial response and nonresponse to antidepressant therapy

T2 - Current approaches and treatment options

AU - Hirschfeld, Robert M A

AU - Montgomery, Stuart A.

AU - Aguglia, Eugenio

AU - Amore, Mario

AU - Delgado, Pedro L.

AU - Gastpar, Markus

AU - Hawley, Christopher

AU - Kasper, Siegfried

AU - Linden, Michael

AU - Massana, Juan

AU - Mendlewicz, Julien

AU - Möller, Hans Jürgen

AU - Nemeroff, Charles B.

AU - Saiz, Jerónimo

AU - Such, Pedro

AU - Torta, Riccardo

AU - Versiani, Marcio

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

N2 - Background: Response to antidepressant drug therapy is less than optimal for a considerable proportion of depressed patients; at present, however, few data exist to guide their rational therapeutic management. This review describes general principles for the management of such patients. This review is the result of an expert roundtable meeting convened to review published clinical data and clinical experience and provide clinicians with evidence-based principles on the management of patients who fail to respond optimally to initial antidepressant therapy. Roundtable Findings: Failure to respond may be defined as a < 25% decrease on an accepted symptom rating scale such as the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) or the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) in a patient who has received an adequate dosage for 4 weeks. In these patients, a neuropharmacologic rationale exists to switch to an agent with a different mode of action or a dual action. Partial response may be defined as 6 to 8 weeks at an adequate dosage and 25% to 50% decrease in MADRS or HAM-D score. In these patients, dose escalation should be considered, followed by augmentation and switching strategies. For augmentation, knowledge of neuropharmacology may allow prediction of which second agent will potentiate or complement the action of the first agent; it may also permit the prediction of potential safety concerns. Conclusions of the Panel: On the basis of a review of the medical literature and clinical experience regarding patients with partial response or nonresponse to antidepressant drug therapy, it appears that simultaneous targeting of both the noradrenergic and serotonergic systems is one of the most effective augmentation strategies. Switching to an agent of a different class is probably optimal for those patients who fail to respond to first-line therapy.

AB - Background: Response to antidepressant drug therapy is less than optimal for a considerable proportion of depressed patients; at present, however, few data exist to guide their rational therapeutic management. This review describes general principles for the management of such patients. This review is the result of an expert roundtable meeting convened to review published clinical data and clinical experience and provide clinicians with evidence-based principles on the management of patients who fail to respond optimally to initial antidepressant therapy. Roundtable Findings: Failure to respond may be defined as a < 25% decrease on an accepted symptom rating scale such as the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) or the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) in a patient who has received an adequate dosage for 4 weeks. In these patients, a neuropharmacologic rationale exists to switch to an agent with a different mode of action or a dual action. Partial response may be defined as 6 to 8 weeks at an adequate dosage and 25% to 50% decrease in MADRS or HAM-D score. In these patients, dose escalation should be considered, followed by augmentation and switching strategies. For augmentation, knowledge of neuropharmacology may allow prediction of which second agent will potentiate or complement the action of the first agent; it may also permit the prediction of potential safety concerns. Conclusions of the Panel: On the basis of a review of the medical literature and clinical experience regarding patients with partial response or nonresponse to antidepressant drug therapy, it appears that simultaneous targeting of both the noradrenergic and serotonergic systems is one of the most effective augmentation strategies. Switching to an agent of a different class is probably optimal for those patients who fail to respond to first-line therapy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036737189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036737189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 826

EP - 837

JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

SN - 0160-6689

IS - 9

ER -