Partnerships between Academic Health Centers and Area Health Education Centers in developing community-based ambulatory education networks in North Carolina and Texas

T. G. Irons, S. S. Gustke, D. C. Lynch, S. Shelton, A. J. Speer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Community-based ambulatory education is a key component of curricula in many medical schools in the USA. Challenges to implementation include recruitment of sufficient sites, competition among health professions schools for sites, geographical barriers, and availability of adequate funds. Purpose: In this paper we discuss partnerships developed by East Carolina University School of Medicine and the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston with their respective North Carolina and East Texas Area Health Education Center systems. We explain how we addressed the challenges mentioned above. Method: We developed community-based ambulatory education networks in both states by establishing formal offices to coordinate site identification and student placement, and to facilitate communication between health professions schools, course directors, and preceptors. Results: We attribute the positive outcomes of the alliances to enrolling sufficient sites, developing a mechanism for providing preceptor and student support services, implementing community faculty development programs, and developing model interdisciplinary teaching sites. Discussion: Several lessons have been learned. First, community sites with unstable financial and personnel situations are generally unsuitable for educational program development. Second, collaboration is an ongoing task requiring repeated reaffirmation of the shared mission. Finally, collaboration strengthens political representation that may be important to garnering financial support for community-based ambulatory education. Conclusion: The model of collaboration described in this paper may be valuable to other schools that plan to expand community-based education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)289-298
Number of pages10
JournalEducation for Health
Volume12
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Area Health Education Centers
education center
health promotion
Education
Health
health
Health Occupations
community
education
school
Students
Financial Support
Social Planning
profession
Program Development
Financial Management
Medical Schools
Curriculum
Teaching
educational program

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Partnerships between Academic Health Centers and Area Health Education Centers in developing community-based ambulatory education networks in North Carolina and Texas. / Irons, T. G.; Gustke, S. S.; Lynch, D. C.; Shelton, S.; Speer, A. J.

In: Education for Health, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1999, p. 289-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{40dad3cdf02242c89a1990b34cfd4d14,
title = "Partnerships between Academic Health Centers and Area Health Education Centers in developing community-based ambulatory education networks in North Carolina and Texas",
abstract = "Context: Community-based ambulatory education is a key component of curricula in many medical schools in the USA. Challenges to implementation include recruitment of sufficient sites, competition among health professions schools for sites, geographical barriers, and availability of adequate funds. Purpose: In this paper we discuss partnerships developed by East Carolina University School of Medicine and the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston with their respective North Carolina and East Texas Area Health Education Center systems. We explain how we addressed the challenges mentioned above. Method: We developed community-based ambulatory education networks in both states by establishing formal offices to coordinate site identification and student placement, and to facilitate communication between health professions schools, course directors, and preceptors. Results: We attribute the positive outcomes of the alliances to enrolling sufficient sites, developing a mechanism for providing preceptor and student support services, implementing community faculty development programs, and developing model interdisciplinary teaching sites. Discussion: Several lessons have been learned. First, community sites with unstable financial and personnel situations are generally unsuitable for educational program development. Second, collaboration is an ongoing task requiring repeated reaffirmation of the shared mission. Finally, collaboration strengthens political representation that may be important to garnering financial support for community-based ambulatory education. Conclusion: The model of collaboration described in this paper may be valuable to other schools that plan to expand community-based education.",
author = "Irons, {T. G.} and Gustke, {S. S.} and Lynch, {D. C.} and S. Shelton and Speer, {A. J.}",
year = "1999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "289--298",
journal = "Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice",
issn = "1357-6283",
publisher = "Network: Towards Unity for Health",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partnerships between Academic Health Centers and Area Health Education Centers in developing community-based ambulatory education networks in North Carolina and Texas

AU - Irons, T. G.

AU - Gustke, S. S.

AU - Lynch, D. C.

AU - Shelton, S.

AU - Speer, A. J.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Context: Community-based ambulatory education is a key component of curricula in many medical schools in the USA. Challenges to implementation include recruitment of sufficient sites, competition among health professions schools for sites, geographical barriers, and availability of adequate funds. Purpose: In this paper we discuss partnerships developed by East Carolina University School of Medicine and the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston with their respective North Carolina and East Texas Area Health Education Center systems. We explain how we addressed the challenges mentioned above. Method: We developed community-based ambulatory education networks in both states by establishing formal offices to coordinate site identification and student placement, and to facilitate communication between health professions schools, course directors, and preceptors. Results: We attribute the positive outcomes of the alliances to enrolling sufficient sites, developing a mechanism for providing preceptor and student support services, implementing community faculty development programs, and developing model interdisciplinary teaching sites. Discussion: Several lessons have been learned. First, community sites with unstable financial and personnel situations are generally unsuitable for educational program development. Second, collaboration is an ongoing task requiring repeated reaffirmation of the shared mission. Finally, collaboration strengthens political representation that may be important to garnering financial support for community-based ambulatory education. Conclusion: The model of collaboration described in this paper may be valuable to other schools that plan to expand community-based education.

AB - Context: Community-based ambulatory education is a key component of curricula in many medical schools in the USA. Challenges to implementation include recruitment of sufficient sites, competition among health professions schools for sites, geographical barriers, and availability of adequate funds. Purpose: In this paper we discuss partnerships developed by East Carolina University School of Medicine and the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston with their respective North Carolina and East Texas Area Health Education Center systems. We explain how we addressed the challenges mentioned above. Method: We developed community-based ambulatory education networks in both states by establishing formal offices to coordinate site identification and student placement, and to facilitate communication between health professions schools, course directors, and preceptors. Results: We attribute the positive outcomes of the alliances to enrolling sufficient sites, developing a mechanism for providing preceptor and student support services, implementing community faculty development programs, and developing model interdisciplinary teaching sites. Discussion: Several lessons have been learned. First, community sites with unstable financial and personnel situations are generally unsuitable for educational program development. Second, collaboration is an ongoing task requiring repeated reaffirmation of the shared mission. Finally, collaboration strengthens political representation that may be important to garnering financial support for community-based ambulatory education. Conclusion: The model of collaboration described in this paper may be valuable to other schools that plan to expand community-based education.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032739268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032739268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032739268

VL - 12

SP - 289

EP - 298

JO - Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice

JF - Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice

SN - 1357-6283

IS - 3

ER -