Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer

Nina P. Tamirisa, James Goodwin, Arti Kandalam, Suzanne K. Linder, Susan Weller, Stella Turrubiate, Colleen Silva, Taylor S. Riall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Engaging patients in shared decision making involves patient knowledge of treatment options and physician elicitation of patient preferences. Objective: Our aim was to explore patient and physician perceptions of shared decision making in clinical encounters for cancer care. Design: Patients and physicians were asked open-ended questions regarding their perceptions of shared decision making throughout their cancer care. Transcripts of interviews were coded and analysed for shared decision-making themes. Setting and participants: At an academic medical centre, 20 cancer patients with a range of cancer diagnoses, stages of cancer and time from diagnosis, and eight physicians involved in cancer care were individually interviewed. Discussion and conclusions: Most physicians reported providing patients with written information. However, most patients reported that written information was too detailed and felt that the physicians did not assess the level of information they wished to receive. Most patients wanted to play an active role in the treatment decision, but also wanted the physician's recommendation, such as what their physician would choose for him/herself or a family member in a similar situation. While physicians stated that they incorporated patient autonomy in decision making, most provided data without making treatment recommendations in the format preferred by most patients. We identified several communication gaps in cancer care. While patients want to be involved in the decision-making process, they also want physicians to provide evidence-based recommendations in the context of their individual preferences. However, physicians often are reluctant to provide a recommendation that will bias the patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHealth Expectations
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Physicians
Neoplasms
Patient Preference
Therapeutics
Communication
Interviews

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Communication
  • Patient preference
  • Patient-centered outcomes research
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Tamirisa, N. P., Goodwin, J., Kandalam, A., Linder, S. K., Weller, S., Turrubiate, S., ... Riall, T. S. (Accepted/In press). Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer. Health Expectations. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12564

Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer. / Tamirisa, Nina P.; Goodwin, James; Kandalam, Arti; Linder, Suzanne K.; Weller, Susan; Turrubiate, Stella; Silva, Colleen; Riall, Taylor S.

In: Health Expectations, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tamirisa, Nina P. ; Goodwin, James ; Kandalam, Arti ; Linder, Suzanne K. ; Weller, Susan ; Turrubiate, Stella ; Silva, Colleen ; Riall, Taylor S. / Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer. In: Health Expectations. 2017.
@article{42271c6754544820aa30cc2a4a52ae67,
title = "Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer",
abstract = "Context: Engaging patients in shared decision making involves patient knowledge of treatment options and physician elicitation of patient preferences. Objective: Our aim was to explore patient and physician perceptions of shared decision making in clinical encounters for cancer care. Design: Patients and physicians were asked open-ended questions regarding their perceptions of shared decision making throughout their cancer care. Transcripts of interviews were coded and analysed for shared decision-making themes. Setting and participants: At an academic medical centre, 20 cancer patients with a range of cancer diagnoses, stages of cancer and time from diagnosis, and eight physicians involved in cancer care were individually interviewed. Discussion and conclusions: Most physicians reported providing patients with written information. However, most patients reported that written information was too detailed and felt that the physicians did not assess the level of information they wished to receive. Most patients wanted to play an active role in the treatment decision, but also wanted the physician's recommendation, such as what their physician would choose for him/herself or a family member in a similar situation. While physicians stated that they incorporated patient autonomy in decision making, most provided data without making treatment recommendations in the format preferred by most patients. We identified several communication gaps in cancer care. While patients want to be involved in the decision-making process, they also want physicians to provide evidence-based recommendations in the context of their individual preferences. However, physicians often are reluctant to provide a recommendation that will bias the patient.",
keywords = "Cancer, Communication, Patient preference, Patient-centered outcomes research, Treatment",
author = "Tamirisa, {Nina P.} and James Goodwin and Arti Kandalam and Linder, {Suzanne K.} and Susan Weller and Stella Turrubiate and Colleen Silva and Riall, {Taylor S.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/hex.12564",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Health Expectations",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer

AU - Tamirisa, Nina P.

AU - Goodwin, James

AU - Kandalam, Arti

AU - Linder, Suzanne K.

AU - Weller, Susan

AU - Turrubiate, Stella

AU - Silva, Colleen

AU - Riall, Taylor S.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Context: Engaging patients in shared decision making involves patient knowledge of treatment options and physician elicitation of patient preferences. Objective: Our aim was to explore patient and physician perceptions of shared decision making in clinical encounters for cancer care. Design: Patients and physicians were asked open-ended questions regarding their perceptions of shared decision making throughout their cancer care. Transcripts of interviews were coded and analysed for shared decision-making themes. Setting and participants: At an academic medical centre, 20 cancer patients with a range of cancer diagnoses, stages of cancer and time from diagnosis, and eight physicians involved in cancer care were individually interviewed. Discussion and conclusions: Most physicians reported providing patients with written information. However, most patients reported that written information was too detailed and felt that the physicians did not assess the level of information they wished to receive. Most patients wanted to play an active role in the treatment decision, but also wanted the physician's recommendation, such as what their physician would choose for him/herself or a family member in a similar situation. While physicians stated that they incorporated patient autonomy in decision making, most provided data without making treatment recommendations in the format preferred by most patients. We identified several communication gaps in cancer care. While patients want to be involved in the decision-making process, they also want physicians to provide evidence-based recommendations in the context of their individual preferences. However, physicians often are reluctant to provide a recommendation that will bias the patient.

AB - Context: Engaging patients in shared decision making involves patient knowledge of treatment options and physician elicitation of patient preferences. Objective: Our aim was to explore patient and physician perceptions of shared decision making in clinical encounters for cancer care. Design: Patients and physicians were asked open-ended questions regarding their perceptions of shared decision making throughout their cancer care. Transcripts of interviews were coded and analysed for shared decision-making themes. Setting and participants: At an academic medical centre, 20 cancer patients with a range of cancer diagnoses, stages of cancer and time from diagnosis, and eight physicians involved in cancer care were individually interviewed. Discussion and conclusions: Most physicians reported providing patients with written information. However, most patients reported that written information was too detailed and felt that the physicians did not assess the level of information they wished to receive. Most patients wanted to play an active role in the treatment decision, but also wanted the physician's recommendation, such as what their physician would choose for him/herself or a family member in a similar situation. While physicians stated that they incorporated patient autonomy in decision making, most provided data without making treatment recommendations in the format preferred by most patients. We identified several communication gaps in cancer care. While patients want to be involved in the decision-making process, they also want physicians to provide evidence-based recommendations in the context of their individual preferences. However, physicians often are reluctant to provide a recommendation that will bias the patient.

KW - Cancer

KW - Communication

KW - Patient preference

KW - Patient-centered outcomes research

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018741285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018741285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/hex.12564

DO - 10.1111/hex.12564

M3 - Article

C2 - 28464430

AN - SCOPUS:85018741285

JO - Health Expectations

JF - Health Expectations

SN - 1369-6513

ER -