Patient-centered mobility outcome preferences according to individuals with stroke and caregivers: a qualitative analysis

Shilpa Krishnan, Monique Pappadis, Susan Weller, Steven Fisher, Catherine C. Hay, Timothy Reistetter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the mobility-related preferences among stroke survivors and caregivers following post-acute rehabilitation at inpatient or skilled nursing facilities. Methods: In this cross-sectional study; semi-structured, qualitative interviews of stroke survivors (n = 24) and informal caregivers (n = 15) were conducted. The participants were recruited from the community. Results: Comparative content analysis was used to identify themes by two independent coders. The survivors (68 years) and caregivers (58 years) mentioned mobility-related consequences including inability to walk, balance, drive, and transfer; and increased falls. The survivors (63%) and caregivers (73%) also mentioned the use of assistive devices. The common rehabilitation activities included: walking (62%); followed by standing and mobility; strength and balance; and wheelchair skills. Some stroke survivors were dissatisfied as their rehabilitation was not patient-centered. Frequently mentioned outcome preferences by survivors were ability to walk (88%), move, and balance. They also wanted to acquire assistive devices to move independently. Caregivers were concerned with the survivor’s safety and wanted them to drive (53%), prevent falls, have home accommodations, and transfer independently. Caregivers (40%) also expressed the importance of receiving realistic information. Conclusions: This study suggests a need to consider the stroke survivors’ and caregivers’ mobility outcome preferences to improve the patient-centered rehabilitation care.Implications for RehabilitationStroke survivors and caregivers tend to differ in their outcome preferences.Caregivers expressed concern for transfers, driving, fall prevention, home modifications, and wished for realistic information.Incorporating stroke survivors and their families’ perspectives during rehabilitation may enhance patient-centered outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Mar 8 2017

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Survivors
Stroke
Rehabilitation
Self-Help Devices
Skilled Nursing Facilities
Patient-Centered Care
Wheelchairs
Aptitude
Walking
Inpatients
Cross-Sectional Studies
Interviews
Safety

Keywords

  • caregivers
  • Mobility
  • patient-centered
  • qualitative research
  • rehabilitation
  • stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Patient-centered mobility outcome preferences according to individuals with stroke and caregivers : a qualitative analysis. / Krishnan, Shilpa; Pappadis, Monique; Weller, Susan; Fisher, Steven; Hay, Catherine C.; Reistetter, Timothy.

In: Disability and Rehabilitation, 08.03.2017, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da2e7cd960564e95a9b6b2aaa2551914,
title = "Patient-centered mobility outcome preferences according to individuals with stroke and caregivers: a qualitative analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: To explore the mobility-related preferences among stroke survivors and caregivers following post-acute rehabilitation at inpatient or skilled nursing facilities. Methods: In this cross-sectional study; semi-structured, qualitative interviews of stroke survivors (n = 24) and informal caregivers (n = 15) were conducted. The participants were recruited from the community. Results: Comparative content analysis was used to identify themes by two independent coders. The survivors (68 years) and caregivers (58 years) mentioned mobility-related consequences including inability to walk, balance, drive, and transfer; and increased falls. The survivors (63{\%}) and caregivers (73{\%}) also mentioned the use of assistive devices. The common rehabilitation activities included: walking (62{\%}); followed by standing and mobility; strength and balance; and wheelchair skills. Some stroke survivors were dissatisfied as their rehabilitation was not patient-centered. Frequently mentioned outcome preferences by survivors were ability to walk (88{\%}), move, and balance. They also wanted to acquire assistive devices to move independently. Caregivers were concerned with the survivor’s safety and wanted them to drive (53{\%}), prevent falls, have home accommodations, and transfer independently. Caregivers (40{\%}) also expressed the importance of receiving realistic information. Conclusions: This study suggests a need to consider the stroke survivors’ and caregivers’ mobility outcome preferences to improve the patient-centered rehabilitation care.Implications for RehabilitationStroke survivors and caregivers tend to differ in their outcome preferences.Caregivers expressed concern for transfers, driving, fall prevention, home modifications, and wished for realistic information.Incorporating stroke survivors and their families’ perspectives during rehabilitation may enhance patient-centered outcomes.",
keywords = "caregivers, Mobility, patient-centered, qualitative research, rehabilitation, stroke",
author = "Shilpa Krishnan and Monique Pappadis and Susan Weller and Steven Fisher and Hay, {Catherine C.} and Timothy Reistetter",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/09638288.2017.1297855",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-centered mobility outcome preferences according to individuals with stroke and caregivers

T2 - a qualitative analysis

AU - Krishnan, Shilpa

AU - Pappadis, Monique

AU - Weller, Susan

AU - Fisher, Steven

AU - Hay, Catherine C.

AU - Reistetter, Timothy

PY - 2017/3/8

Y1 - 2017/3/8

N2 - Purpose: To explore the mobility-related preferences among stroke survivors and caregivers following post-acute rehabilitation at inpatient or skilled nursing facilities. Methods: In this cross-sectional study; semi-structured, qualitative interviews of stroke survivors (n = 24) and informal caregivers (n = 15) were conducted. The participants were recruited from the community. Results: Comparative content analysis was used to identify themes by two independent coders. The survivors (68 years) and caregivers (58 years) mentioned mobility-related consequences including inability to walk, balance, drive, and transfer; and increased falls. The survivors (63%) and caregivers (73%) also mentioned the use of assistive devices. The common rehabilitation activities included: walking (62%); followed by standing and mobility; strength and balance; and wheelchair skills. Some stroke survivors were dissatisfied as their rehabilitation was not patient-centered. Frequently mentioned outcome preferences by survivors were ability to walk (88%), move, and balance. They also wanted to acquire assistive devices to move independently. Caregivers were concerned with the survivor’s safety and wanted them to drive (53%), prevent falls, have home accommodations, and transfer independently. Caregivers (40%) also expressed the importance of receiving realistic information. Conclusions: This study suggests a need to consider the stroke survivors’ and caregivers’ mobility outcome preferences to improve the patient-centered rehabilitation care.Implications for RehabilitationStroke survivors and caregivers tend to differ in their outcome preferences.Caregivers expressed concern for transfers, driving, fall prevention, home modifications, and wished for realistic information.Incorporating stroke survivors and their families’ perspectives during rehabilitation may enhance patient-centered outcomes.

AB - Purpose: To explore the mobility-related preferences among stroke survivors and caregivers following post-acute rehabilitation at inpatient or skilled nursing facilities. Methods: In this cross-sectional study; semi-structured, qualitative interviews of stroke survivors (n = 24) and informal caregivers (n = 15) were conducted. The participants were recruited from the community. Results: Comparative content analysis was used to identify themes by two independent coders. The survivors (68 years) and caregivers (58 years) mentioned mobility-related consequences including inability to walk, balance, drive, and transfer; and increased falls. The survivors (63%) and caregivers (73%) also mentioned the use of assistive devices. The common rehabilitation activities included: walking (62%); followed by standing and mobility; strength and balance; and wheelchair skills. Some stroke survivors were dissatisfied as their rehabilitation was not patient-centered. Frequently mentioned outcome preferences by survivors were ability to walk (88%), move, and balance. They also wanted to acquire assistive devices to move independently. Caregivers were concerned with the survivor’s safety and wanted them to drive (53%), prevent falls, have home accommodations, and transfer independently. Caregivers (40%) also expressed the importance of receiving realistic information. Conclusions: This study suggests a need to consider the stroke survivors’ and caregivers’ mobility outcome preferences to improve the patient-centered rehabilitation care.Implications for RehabilitationStroke survivors and caregivers tend to differ in their outcome preferences.Caregivers expressed concern for transfers, driving, fall prevention, home modifications, and wished for realistic information.Incorporating stroke survivors and their families’ perspectives during rehabilitation may enhance patient-centered outcomes.

KW - caregivers

KW - Mobility

KW - patient-centered

KW - qualitative research

KW - rehabilitation

KW - stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015763778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015763778&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09638288.2017.1297855

DO - 10.1080/09638288.2017.1297855

M3 - Article

C2 - 28320217

AN - SCOPUS:85015763778

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

ER -