Patient perception of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Sigi P. Joseph, B. Todd Moore, Geoffrey Slayden, George B. Sorensen, Conrad Boettger, David Potter, Daniel Margolin, Kimberly Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is gradually being adopted into general surgical practice. The potential risks and benefits are still being studied, and little is known about how patients perceive this new surgical technique. Methods: After providing patients with basic educational materials on laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and SILC, we administered a questionnaire exploring patients' perspectives of the importance of postoperative pain, scar appearance, risk of complications, and cost regarding their preference for SILC versus LC. Results: Among 100 patients (mean age, 43.3 years), the majority were women (85%), white (85%), college educated (77%), and privately insured (85%). Indications included biliary dyskinesia (43%), biliary colic (48%), and acute cholecystitis (9%). Patients stated that they would be somewhat or very interested in SILC if recommended by their surgeon (89%), although 35% were somewhat or very concerned about the lack of long-term results. The majority would accept no additional risk to undergo SILC. Scar appearance was somewhat or very important to!40% of patients, whereas pain was somewhat or very important to 79%. Only 27% of patients would spend $100 to undergo SILC. When asked to rank pain, appearance, symptom resolution, personal cost, and risk of complications, 52% ranked symptom resolution, 20% ranked pain, and 19% ranked risk of complications as most important. Conclusions: Safety and relief of symptoms are most important to patients with gallbladder disease, whereas postprocedural esthetics was relatively unimportant and few would be willing to pay more for SILC versus LC. However, if the surgeon recommends SILC, most patients would trust this recommendation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)585-595
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Pain
Cicatrix
Biliary Dyskinesia
Gallbladder Diseases
Costs and Cost Analysis
Acute Cholecystitis
Colic
Postoperative Pain
Esthetics
General Practice
Safety

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Joseph, S. P., Moore, B. T., Slayden, G., Sorensen, G. B., Boettger, C., Potter, D., ... Brown, K. (2013). Patient perception of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 17(4), 585-595. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13693422520396

Patient perception of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. / Joseph, Sigi P.; Moore, B. Todd; Slayden, Geoffrey; Sorensen, George B.; Boettger, Conrad; Potter, David; Margolin, Daniel; Brown, Kimberly.

In: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Vol. 17, No. 4, 10.2013, p. 585-595.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Joseph, SP, Moore, BT, Slayden, G, Sorensen, GB, Boettger, C, Potter, D, Margolin, D & Brown, K 2013, 'Patient perception of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy', Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 585-595. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13693422520396
Joseph, Sigi P. ; Moore, B. Todd ; Slayden, Geoffrey ; Sorensen, George B. ; Boettger, Conrad ; Potter, David ; Margolin, Daniel ; Brown, Kimberly. / Patient perception of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2013 ; Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. 585-595.
@article{b8f5e99ad4c14e46bb75629be95eb7dd,
title = "Patient perception of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is gradually being adopted into general surgical practice. The potential risks and benefits are still being studied, and little is known about how patients perceive this new surgical technique. Methods: After providing patients with basic educational materials on laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and SILC, we administered a questionnaire exploring patients' perspectives of the importance of postoperative pain, scar appearance, risk of complications, and cost regarding their preference for SILC versus LC. Results: Among 100 patients (mean age, 43.3 years), the majority were women (85{\%}), white (85{\%}), college educated (77{\%}), and privately insured (85{\%}). Indications included biliary dyskinesia (43{\%}), biliary colic (48{\%}), and acute cholecystitis (9{\%}). Patients stated that they would be somewhat or very interested in SILC if recommended by their surgeon (89{\%}), although 35{\%} were somewhat or very concerned about the lack of long-term results. The majority would accept no additional risk to undergo SILC. Scar appearance was somewhat or very important to!40{\%} of patients, whereas pain was somewhat or very important to 79{\%}. Only 27{\%} of patients would spend $100 to undergo SILC. When asked to rank pain, appearance, symptom resolution, personal cost, and risk of complications, 52{\%} ranked symptom resolution, 20{\%} ranked pain, and 19{\%} ranked risk of complications as most important. Conclusions: Safety and relief of symptoms are most important to patients with gallbladder disease, whereas postprocedural esthetics was relatively unimportant and few would be willing to pay more for SILC versus LC. However, if the surgeon recommends SILC, most patients would trust this recommendation.",
keywords = "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Perception",
author = "Joseph, {Sigi P.} and Moore, {B. Todd} and Geoffrey Slayden and Sorensen, {George B.} and Conrad Boettger and David Potter and Daniel Margolin and Kimberly Brown",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.4293/108680813X13693422520396",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "585--595",
journal = "Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons",
issn = "1086-8089",
publisher = "Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient perception of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

AU - Joseph, Sigi P.

AU - Moore, B. Todd

AU - Slayden, Geoffrey

AU - Sorensen, George B.

AU - Boettger, Conrad

AU - Potter, David

AU - Margolin, Daniel

AU - Brown, Kimberly

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Background and Objectives: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is gradually being adopted into general surgical practice. The potential risks and benefits are still being studied, and little is known about how patients perceive this new surgical technique. Methods: After providing patients with basic educational materials on laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and SILC, we administered a questionnaire exploring patients' perspectives of the importance of postoperative pain, scar appearance, risk of complications, and cost regarding their preference for SILC versus LC. Results: Among 100 patients (mean age, 43.3 years), the majority were women (85%), white (85%), college educated (77%), and privately insured (85%). Indications included biliary dyskinesia (43%), biliary colic (48%), and acute cholecystitis (9%). Patients stated that they would be somewhat or very interested in SILC if recommended by their surgeon (89%), although 35% were somewhat or very concerned about the lack of long-term results. The majority would accept no additional risk to undergo SILC. Scar appearance was somewhat or very important to!40% of patients, whereas pain was somewhat or very important to 79%. Only 27% of patients would spend $100 to undergo SILC. When asked to rank pain, appearance, symptom resolution, personal cost, and risk of complications, 52% ranked symptom resolution, 20% ranked pain, and 19% ranked risk of complications as most important. Conclusions: Safety and relief of symptoms are most important to patients with gallbladder disease, whereas postprocedural esthetics was relatively unimportant and few would be willing to pay more for SILC versus LC. However, if the surgeon recommends SILC, most patients would trust this recommendation.

AB - Background and Objectives: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is gradually being adopted into general surgical practice. The potential risks and benefits are still being studied, and little is known about how patients perceive this new surgical technique. Methods: After providing patients with basic educational materials on laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and SILC, we administered a questionnaire exploring patients' perspectives of the importance of postoperative pain, scar appearance, risk of complications, and cost regarding their preference for SILC versus LC. Results: Among 100 patients (mean age, 43.3 years), the majority were women (85%), white (85%), college educated (77%), and privately insured (85%). Indications included biliary dyskinesia (43%), biliary colic (48%), and acute cholecystitis (9%). Patients stated that they would be somewhat or very interested in SILC if recommended by their surgeon (89%), although 35% were somewhat or very concerned about the lack of long-term results. The majority would accept no additional risk to undergo SILC. Scar appearance was somewhat or very important to!40% of patients, whereas pain was somewhat or very important to 79%. Only 27% of patients would spend $100 to undergo SILC. When asked to rank pain, appearance, symptom resolution, personal cost, and risk of complications, 52% ranked symptom resolution, 20% ranked pain, and 19% ranked risk of complications as most important. Conclusions: Safety and relief of symptoms are most important to patients with gallbladder disease, whereas postprocedural esthetics was relatively unimportant and few would be willing to pay more for SILC versus LC. However, if the surgeon recommends SILC, most patients would trust this recommendation.

KW - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

KW - Perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891778568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891778568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4293/108680813X13693422520396

DO - 10.4293/108680813X13693422520396

M3 - Article

C2 - 24398201

AN - SCOPUS:84891778568

VL - 17

SP - 585

EP - 595

JO - Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

JF - Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

SN - 1086-8089

IS - 4

ER -