Patterns of Communication Breakdowns Resulting in Injury to Surgical Patients

Caprice C. Greenberg, Scott E. Regenbogen, David M. Studdert, Stuart R. Lipsitz, Selwyn O. Rogers, Michael J. Zinner, Atul A. Gawande

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

467 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Communication breakdowns are a common threat to surgical safety, but there are little data to guide initiatives to improve communication. Study design: In surgeon-review of 444 surgical malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers, we identified 60 cases involving communication breakdowns resulting in harm to patients. Two surgeon-reviewers analyzed these cases to identify common characteristics and associated factors. Based on identified patterns, potential interventions to prevent communication breakdowns were developed and their potential impact was assessed. Results: The 60 cases involved 81 communication breakdowns, occurring in the preoperative (38%), intraoperative (30%), and postoperative periods (32%). Seventy-two percent of cases involved one communication breakdown. The majority of breakdowns were verbal communications (92%) involving 1 transmitter and 1 receiver (64%). Attending surgeons were the most common team member involved. Status asymmetry (74%) and ambiguity about responsibilities (73%) were commonly associated factors. Forty-three percent of communication breakdowns occurred with handoffs and 39% with transfers in the patient's location. The most common communication breakdowns involved residents failing to notify the attending surgeon of critical events and a failure of attending-to-attending handoffs. Proposed interventions could prevent 45% to 73% of communication breakdowns in this cases series. Conclusions: Serious communication breakdowns occur across the continuum of care, typically result from a failure in verbal communication between a surgical attending and another caregiver, and often involve ambiguity about responsibilities. Interventions to prevent these breakdowns should involve: defined triggers that mandate communication with an attending surgeon; structured handoffs and transfer protocols; and standard use of read-backs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)533-540
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume204
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intraoperative Complications
Communication
Intraoperative Period
Patient Harm
Patient Transfer
Insurance Carriers
Continuity of Patient Care
Malpractice
Postoperative Period
Caregivers
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Greenberg, C. C., Regenbogen, S. E., Studdert, D. M., Lipsitz, S. R., Rogers, S. O., Zinner, M. J., & Gawande, A. A. (2007). Patterns of Communication Breakdowns Resulting in Injury to Surgical Patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 204(4), 533-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.010

Patterns of Communication Breakdowns Resulting in Injury to Surgical Patients. / Greenberg, Caprice C.; Regenbogen, Scott E.; Studdert, David M.; Lipsitz, Stuart R.; Rogers, Selwyn O.; Zinner, Michael J.; Gawande, Atul A.

In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 204, No. 4, 04.2007, p. 533-540.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Greenberg, CC, Regenbogen, SE, Studdert, DM, Lipsitz, SR, Rogers, SO, Zinner, MJ & Gawande, AA 2007, 'Patterns of Communication Breakdowns Resulting in Injury to Surgical Patients', Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 204, no. 4, pp. 533-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.010
Greenberg, Caprice C. ; Regenbogen, Scott E. ; Studdert, David M. ; Lipsitz, Stuart R. ; Rogers, Selwyn O. ; Zinner, Michael J. ; Gawande, Atul A. / Patterns of Communication Breakdowns Resulting in Injury to Surgical Patients. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2007 ; Vol. 204, No. 4. pp. 533-540.
@article{a7034f7aeca54027863f7aa380baa419,
title = "Patterns of Communication Breakdowns Resulting in Injury to Surgical Patients",
abstract = "Background: Communication breakdowns are a common threat to surgical safety, but there are little data to guide initiatives to improve communication. Study design: In surgeon-review of 444 surgical malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers, we identified 60 cases involving communication breakdowns resulting in harm to patients. Two surgeon-reviewers analyzed these cases to identify common characteristics and associated factors. Based on identified patterns, potential interventions to prevent communication breakdowns were developed and their potential impact was assessed. Results: The 60 cases involved 81 communication breakdowns, occurring in the preoperative (38{\%}), intraoperative (30{\%}), and postoperative periods (32{\%}). Seventy-two percent of cases involved one communication breakdown. The majority of breakdowns were verbal communications (92{\%}) involving 1 transmitter and 1 receiver (64{\%}). Attending surgeons were the most common team member involved. Status asymmetry (74{\%}) and ambiguity about responsibilities (73{\%}) were commonly associated factors. Forty-three percent of communication breakdowns occurred with handoffs and 39{\%} with transfers in the patient's location. The most common communication breakdowns involved residents failing to notify the attending surgeon of critical events and a failure of attending-to-attending handoffs. Proposed interventions could prevent 45{\%} to 73{\%} of communication breakdowns in this cases series. Conclusions: Serious communication breakdowns occur across the continuum of care, typically result from a failure in verbal communication between a surgical attending and another caregiver, and often involve ambiguity about responsibilities. Interventions to prevent these breakdowns should involve: defined triggers that mandate communication with an attending surgeon; structured handoffs and transfer protocols; and standard use of read-backs.",
author = "Greenberg, {Caprice C.} and Regenbogen, {Scott E.} and Studdert, {David M.} and Lipsitz, {Stuart R.} and Rogers, {Selwyn O.} and Zinner, {Michael J.} and Gawande, {Atul A.}",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "204",
pages = "533--540",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Surgeons",
issn = "1072-7515",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns of Communication Breakdowns Resulting in Injury to Surgical Patients

AU - Greenberg, Caprice C.

AU - Regenbogen, Scott E.

AU - Studdert, David M.

AU - Lipsitz, Stuart R.

AU - Rogers, Selwyn O.

AU - Zinner, Michael J.

AU - Gawande, Atul A.

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Background: Communication breakdowns are a common threat to surgical safety, but there are little data to guide initiatives to improve communication. Study design: In surgeon-review of 444 surgical malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers, we identified 60 cases involving communication breakdowns resulting in harm to patients. Two surgeon-reviewers analyzed these cases to identify common characteristics and associated factors. Based on identified patterns, potential interventions to prevent communication breakdowns were developed and their potential impact was assessed. Results: The 60 cases involved 81 communication breakdowns, occurring in the preoperative (38%), intraoperative (30%), and postoperative periods (32%). Seventy-two percent of cases involved one communication breakdown. The majority of breakdowns were verbal communications (92%) involving 1 transmitter and 1 receiver (64%). Attending surgeons were the most common team member involved. Status asymmetry (74%) and ambiguity about responsibilities (73%) were commonly associated factors. Forty-three percent of communication breakdowns occurred with handoffs and 39% with transfers in the patient's location. The most common communication breakdowns involved residents failing to notify the attending surgeon of critical events and a failure of attending-to-attending handoffs. Proposed interventions could prevent 45% to 73% of communication breakdowns in this cases series. Conclusions: Serious communication breakdowns occur across the continuum of care, typically result from a failure in verbal communication between a surgical attending and another caregiver, and often involve ambiguity about responsibilities. Interventions to prevent these breakdowns should involve: defined triggers that mandate communication with an attending surgeon; structured handoffs and transfer protocols; and standard use of read-backs.

AB - Background: Communication breakdowns are a common threat to surgical safety, but there are little data to guide initiatives to improve communication. Study design: In surgeon-review of 444 surgical malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers, we identified 60 cases involving communication breakdowns resulting in harm to patients. Two surgeon-reviewers analyzed these cases to identify common characteristics and associated factors. Based on identified patterns, potential interventions to prevent communication breakdowns were developed and their potential impact was assessed. Results: The 60 cases involved 81 communication breakdowns, occurring in the preoperative (38%), intraoperative (30%), and postoperative periods (32%). Seventy-two percent of cases involved one communication breakdown. The majority of breakdowns were verbal communications (92%) involving 1 transmitter and 1 receiver (64%). Attending surgeons were the most common team member involved. Status asymmetry (74%) and ambiguity about responsibilities (73%) were commonly associated factors. Forty-three percent of communication breakdowns occurred with handoffs and 39% with transfers in the patient's location. The most common communication breakdowns involved residents failing to notify the attending surgeon of critical events and a failure of attending-to-attending handoffs. Proposed interventions could prevent 45% to 73% of communication breakdowns in this cases series. Conclusions: Serious communication breakdowns occur across the continuum of care, typically result from a failure in verbal communication between a surgical attending and another caregiver, and often involve ambiguity about responsibilities. Interventions to prevent these breakdowns should involve: defined triggers that mandate communication with an attending surgeon; structured handoffs and transfer protocols; and standard use of read-backs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947247570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947247570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.010

M3 - Article

VL - 204

SP - 533

EP - 540

JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons

SN - 1072-7515

IS - 4

ER -