Permeability Imaging as a Biomarker of Leptomeningeal Collateral Flow in Patients with Intracranial Arterial Stenosis

Different methods of angiography are of great clinical utility; however, it still remains unstandardized as which method would be suitable to determine cerebral collateral circulation. Here we compared digital subtraction angiography (DSA), computer tomography angiography (CTA) and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in seven patients with severe intracranial arterial stenosis, and determine whether volume transfer constant (K^trans) maps of permeability imaging could be used as the biomarkers of cerebral collateral circulation. We retrospectively reviewed seven adult patients with severe intracranial arterial stenosis or occlusion with a complete parenchymal and vascular imaging work-up. DSA, CTA source imaging (CTA-SI), arterial spin labeling (ASL), and K^trans maps were used to assess their collateral flow. Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was calculated to test the consistency of their collateral scores. A reasonable agreement was found between DSA and K^trans maps (Kappa = 0.502, P < 0.001) when all 15 regional vascular sites were included, and a better agreement found after exclusion of perforating artery territories (N = 10 sites, Kappa = 0.766, P < 0.001). The agreement between CTA-SI and DSA was moderate on all 15 sites (Kappa = 0.413, P < 0.001) and 10 sites (Kappa = 0.329, P < 0.001). The agreement between ASL and DSA was least favorable, no matter for all 15 sites (Kappa = 0.270, P < 0.001) or 10 sites (Kappa = 0.205, P = 0.002). K^trans maps are useful and promising for leptomeningeal collateral assessment, when compared to CTA-SI or ASL. Further studies are requited for verify its validity in a large registry of patients.