Physical and mental health outcomes of women in nonviolent, unilaterally violent, and mutually violent relationships

Jeffrey Temple, Rebecca Weston, Linda L. Marshall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite equivocal findings on whether men or women are more violent, the negative impact of violence is greatest for women. To determine how gender asymmetry in perpetration affects women's health status, we conducted a study in two phases with 835 African American, Euro-American, and Mexican American low-income women in Project HOW: Health Outcomes of Women. In Phase 1, we used severity and frequency of women's and male partners' violence to create six groups: nonviolent (NV), uni-directional male (UM) perpetrator, uni-directional female (UF) perpetrator and, when both partners were violent, symmetrical (SYM), male primary perpetrator (MPP), and female primary perpetrator (FPP). The MPP group sustained the most threats, violence, sexual aggression, and psychological abuse. They also reported the most fear. Injury was highest in the MPP and FPP groups. In Phase 2, we examined group differences in women's health status over time for 535 participants, who completed five annual interviews. Surprisingly, women's health in the MPP and FPP violence groups was similar and generally worse than if violence was uni-directional.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)335-359
Number of pages25
JournalViolence and Victims
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mental Health
mental health
Women's Health
Violence
Women's Rights
primary group
violence
Health Status
health status
Sex Offenses
Aggression
African Americans
Fear
Group
health
asymmetry
Interviews
sexual violence
Psychology
aggression

Keywords

  • Ethnicity
  • Longitudinal
  • Low-income women
  • Partner violence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Physical and mental health outcomes of women in nonviolent, unilaterally violent, and mutually violent relationships. / Temple, Jeffrey; Weston, Rebecca; Marshall, Linda L.

In: Violence and Victims, Vol. 20, No. 3, 06.2005, p. 335-359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2317a4c1f29b41c79a2472c6d2ccec24,
title = "Physical and mental health outcomes of women in nonviolent, unilaterally violent, and mutually violent relationships",
abstract = "Despite equivocal findings on whether men or women are more violent, the negative impact of violence is greatest for women. To determine how gender asymmetry in perpetration affects women's health status, we conducted a study in two phases with 835 African American, Euro-American, and Mexican American low-income women in Project HOW: Health Outcomes of Women. In Phase 1, we used severity and frequency of women's and male partners' violence to create six groups: nonviolent (NV), uni-directional male (UM) perpetrator, uni-directional female (UF) perpetrator and, when both partners were violent, symmetrical (SYM), male primary perpetrator (MPP), and female primary perpetrator (FPP). The MPP group sustained the most threats, violence, sexual aggression, and psychological abuse. They also reported the most fear. Injury was highest in the MPP and FPP groups. In Phase 2, we examined group differences in women's health status over time for 535 participants, who completed five annual interviews. Surprisingly, women's health in the MPP and FPP violence groups was similar and generally worse than if violence was uni-directional.",
keywords = "Ethnicity, Longitudinal, Low-income women, Partner violence",
author = "Jeffrey Temple and Rebecca Weston and Marshall, {Linda L.}",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1891/vivi.20.3.335",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "335--359",
journal = "Violence and Victims",
issn = "0886-6708",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physical and mental health outcomes of women in nonviolent, unilaterally violent, and mutually violent relationships

AU - Temple, Jeffrey

AU - Weston, Rebecca

AU - Marshall, Linda L.

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Despite equivocal findings on whether men or women are more violent, the negative impact of violence is greatest for women. To determine how gender asymmetry in perpetration affects women's health status, we conducted a study in two phases with 835 African American, Euro-American, and Mexican American low-income women in Project HOW: Health Outcomes of Women. In Phase 1, we used severity and frequency of women's and male partners' violence to create six groups: nonviolent (NV), uni-directional male (UM) perpetrator, uni-directional female (UF) perpetrator and, when both partners were violent, symmetrical (SYM), male primary perpetrator (MPP), and female primary perpetrator (FPP). The MPP group sustained the most threats, violence, sexual aggression, and psychological abuse. They also reported the most fear. Injury was highest in the MPP and FPP groups. In Phase 2, we examined group differences in women's health status over time for 535 participants, who completed five annual interviews. Surprisingly, women's health in the MPP and FPP violence groups was similar and generally worse than if violence was uni-directional.

AB - Despite equivocal findings on whether men or women are more violent, the negative impact of violence is greatest for women. To determine how gender asymmetry in perpetration affects women's health status, we conducted a study in two phases with 835 African American, Euro-American, and Mexican American low-income women in Project HOW: Health Outcomes of Women. In Phase 1, we used severity and frequency of women's and male partners' violence to create six groups: nonviolent (NV), uni-directional male (UM) perpetrator, uni-directional female (UF) perpetrator and, when both partners were violent, symmetrical (SYM), male primary perpetrator (MPP), and female primary perpetrator (FPP). The MPP group sustained the most threats, violence, sexual aggression, and psychological abuse. They also reported the most fear. Injury was highest in the MPP and FPP groups. In Phase 2, we examined group differences in women's health status over time for 535 participants, who completed five annual interviews. Surprisingly, women's health in the MPP and FPP violence groups was similar and generally worse than if violence was uni-directional.

KW - Ethnicity

KW - Longitudinal

KW - Low-income women

KW - Partner violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24744437980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24744437980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1891/vivi.20.3.335

DO - 10.1891/vivi.20.3.335

M3 - Article

C2 - 16180371

AN - SCOPUS:24744437980

VL - 20

SP - 335

EP - 359

JO - Violence and Victims

JF - Violence and Victims

SN - 0886-6708

IS - 3

ER -