Physician-Directed Versus Computerized Closed-Loop Control of Blood Pressure Using Phenylephrine in a Swine Model

Nicole Ribeiro Marques, William Whitehead, Upendar R. Kallu, Michael Kinsky, Joe Funston, Taoufik Wassar, Muzna Khan, Mindy Milosch, Daniel Jupiter, Karolos Grigoriadis, George Kramer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: Vasopressors provide a rapid and effective approach to correct hypotension in the perioperative setting. Our group developed a closed-loop control (CLC) system that titrates phenylephrine (PHP) based on the mean arterial pressure (MAP) during general anesthesia. As a means of evaluating system competence, we compared the performance of the automated CLC with physicians. We hypothesized that our CLC algorithm more effectively maintains blood pressure at a specified target with less blood pressure variability and reduces the dose of PHP required. METHODS:: In a crossover study design, 6 swine under general anesthesia were subjected to a normovolemic hypotensive challenge induced by sodium nitroprusside. The physicians (MD) manually changed the PHP infusion rate, and the CLC system performed this task autonomously, adjusted every 3 seconds to achieve a predetermined MAP. RESULTS:: The CLC maintained MAP within 5 mm Hg of the target for (mean ± standard deviation) 93.5% ± 3.9% of the time versus 72.4% ± 26.8% for the MD treatment (P = .054). The mean (standard deviation) percentage of time that the CLC and MD interventions were above target range was 2.1% ± 3.3% and 25.8% ± 27.4% (P = .06), respectively. Control statistics, performance error, median performance error, and median absolute performance error were not different between CLC and MD interventions. PHP infusion rate adjustments by the physician were performed 12 to 80 times in individual studies over a 60-minute period. The total dose of PHP used was not different between the 2 interventions. CONCLUSIONS:: The CLC system performed as well as an anesthesiologist totally focused on MAP control by infusing PHP. Computerized CLC infusion of PHP provided tight blood pressure control under conditions of experimental vasodilation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Mar 31 2017

Fingerprint

Phenylephrine
Swine
Blood Pressure
Physicians
Arterial Pressure
Cross-Over Studies
General Anesthesia
Social Adjustment
Nitroprusside
Vasodilation
Hypotension
Mental Competency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Physician-Directed Versus Computerized Closed-Loop Control of Blood Pressure Using Phenylephrine in a Swine Model. / Marques, Nicole Ribeiro; Whitehead, William; Kallu, Upendar R.; Kinsky, Michael; Funston, Joe; Wassar, Taoufik; Khan, Muzna; Milosch, Mindy; Jupiter, Daniel; Grigoriadis, Karolos; Kramer, George.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, 31.03.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f24851aefbcf4fe7a2423fbd6280d341,
title = "Physician-Directed Versus Computerized Closed-Loop Control of Blood Pressure Using Phenylephrine in a Swine Model",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:: Vasopressors provide a rapid and effective approach to correct hypotension in the perioperative setting. Our group developed a closed-loop control (CLC) system that titrates phenylephrine (PHP) based on the mean arterial pressure (MAP) during general anesthesia. As a means of evaluating system competence, we compared the performance of the automated CLC with physicians. We hypothesized that our CLC algorithm more effectively maintains blood pressure at a specified target with less blood pressure variability and reduces the dose of PHP required. METHODS:: In a crossover study design, 6 swine under general anesthesia were subjected to a normovolemic hypotensive challenge induced by sodium nitroprusside. The physicians (MD) manually changed the PHP infusion rate, and the CLC system performed this task autonomously, adjusted every 3 seconds to achieve a predetermined MAP. RESULTS:: The CLC maintained MAP within 5 mm Hg of the target for (mean ± standard deviation) 93.5{\%} ± 3.9{\%} of the time versus 72.4{\%} ± 26.8{\%} for the MD treatment (P = .054). The mean (standard deviation) percentage of time that the CLC and MD interventions were above target range was 2.1{\%} ± 3.3{\%} and 25.8{\%} ± 27.4{\%} (P = .06), respectively. Control statistics, performance error, median performance error, and median absolute performance error were not different between CLC and MD interventions. PHP infusion rate adjustments by the physician were performed 12 to 80 times in individual studies over a 60-minute period. The total dose of PHP used was not different between the 2 interventions. CONCLUSIONS:: The CLC system performed as well as an anesthesiologist totally focused on MAP control by infusing PHP. Computerized CLC infusion of PHP provided tight blood pressure control under conditions of experimental vasodilation.",
author = "Marques, {Nicole Ribeiro} and William Whitehead and Kallu, {Upendar R.} and Michael Kinsky and Joe Funston and Taoufik Wassar and Muzna Khan and Mindy Milosch and Daniel Jupiter and Karolos Grigoriadis and George Kramer",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1213/ANE.0000000000001961",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician-Directed Versus Computerized Closed-Loop Control of Blood Pressure Using Phenylephrine in a Swine Model

AU - Marques, Nicole Ribeiro

AU - Whitehead, William

AU - Kallu, Upendar R.

AU - Kinsky, Michael

AU - Funston, Joe

AU - Wassar, Taoufik

AU - Khan, Muzna

AU - Milosch, Mindy

AU - Jupiter, Daniel

AU - Grigoriadis, Karolos

AU - Kramer, George

PY - 2017/3/31

Y1 - 2017/3/31

N2 - BACKGROUND:: Vasopressors provide a rapid and effective approach to correct hypotension in the perioperative setting. Our group developed a closed-loop control (CLC) system that titrates phenylephrine (PHP) based on the mean arterial pressure (MAP) during general anesthesia. As a means of evaluating system competence, we compared the performance of the automated CLC with physicians. We hypothesized that our CLC algorithm more effectively maintains blood pressure at a specified target with less blood pressure variability and reduces the dose of PHP required. METHODS:: In a crossover study design, 6 swine under general anesthesia were subjected to a normovolemic hypotensive challenge induced by sodium nitroprusside. The physicians (MD) manually changed the PHP infusion rate, and the CLC system performed this task autonomously, adjusted every 3 seconds to achieve a predetermined MAP. RESULTS:: The CLC maintained MAP within 5 mm Hg of the target for (mean ± standard deviation) 93.5% ± 3.9% of the time versus 72.4% ± 26.8% for the MD treatment (P = .054). The mean (standard deviation) percentage of time that the CLC and MD interventions were above target range was 2.1% ± 3.3% and 25.8% ± 27.4% (P = .06), respectively. Control statistics, performance error, median performance error, and median absolute performance error were not different between CLC and MD interventions. PHP infusion rate adjustments by the physician were performed 12 to 80 times in individual studies over a 60-minute period. The total dose of PHP used was not different between the 2 interventions. CONCLUSIONS:: The CLC system performed as well as an anesthesiologist totally focused on MAP control by infusing PHP. Computerized CLC infusion of PHP provided tight blood pressure control under conditions of experimental vasodilation.

AB - BACKGROUND:: Vasopressors provide a rapid and effective approach to correct hypotension in the perioperative setting. Our group developed a closed-loop control (CLC) system that titrates phenylephrine (PHP) based on the mean arterial pressure (MAP) during general anesthesia. As a means of evaluating system competence, we compared the performance of the automated CLC with physicians. We hypothesized that our CLC algorithm more effectively maintains blood pressure at a specified target with less blood pressure variability and reduces the dose of PHP required. METHODS:: In a crossover study design, 6 swine under general anesthesia were subjected to a normovolemic hypotensive challenge induced by sodium nitroprusside. The physicians (MD) manually changed the PHP infusion rate, and the CLC system performed this task autonomously, adjusted every 3 seconds to achieve a predetermined MAP. RESULTS:: The CLC maintained MAP within 5 mm Hg of the target for (mean ± standard deviation) 93.5% ± 3.9% of the time versus 72.4% ± 26.8% for the MD treatment (P = .054). The mean (standard deviation) percentage of time that the CLC and MD interventions were above target range was 2.1% ± 3.3% and 25.8% ± 27.4% (P = .06), respectively. Control statistics, performance error, median performance error, and median absolute performance error were not different between CLC and MD interventions. PHP infusion rate adjustments by the physician were performed 12 to 80 times in individual studies over a 60-minute period. The total dose of PHP used was not different between the 2 interventions. CONCLUSIONS:: The CLC system performed as well as an anesthesiologist totally focused on MAP control by infusing PHP. Computerized CLC infusion of PHP provided tight blood pressure control under conditions of experimental vasodilation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016927198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016927198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001961

DO - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001961

M3 - Article

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

ER -