Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care

Nancy L. Keating, Mary Beth Landrum, Selwyn O. Rogers, Susan K. Baum, Beth A. Virnig, Haiden A. Huskamp, Craig C. Earle, Katherine L. Kahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

189 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend advanced care planning for terminally ill patients with <1 year to live. Few data are available regarding when physicians and their terminally ill patients typically discuss end-of-life issues. METHODS: A national survey was conducted of physicians caring for cancer patients about timing of discussions regarding prognosis, do not resuscitate (DNR) status, hospice, and preferred site of death with their terminally ill patients. Logistic regression was used to identify physician and practice characteristics associated with earlier discussions. RESULTS: Among 4074 respondents, 65% would discuss prognosis "now" (defined as patient has 4 months to 6 months to live, asymptomatic). Fewer would discuss DNR status (44%), hospice (26%), or preferred site of death (21%) immediately, with most physicians waiting for patient symptoms or until there are no more treatments to offer. In multivariate analyses, younger physicians more often discussed prognosis, DNR status, hospice, and site of death "now" (all P < .05). Surgeons and oncologists were more likely than noncancer specialists to discuss prognosis "now" (P = .008), but noncancer specialists were more likely than cancer specialists to discuss DNR status, hospice, and preferred site of death "now" (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians report they would not discuss end-oflife options with terminally ill patients who are feeling well, instead waiting for symptoms or until there are no more treatments to offer. More research is needed to understand physicians' reasons for timing of discussions and how their propensity to aggressively treat metastatic disease influences timing, as well as how the timing of discussions influences patient and family experiences at the end of life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)998-1006
Number of pages9
JournalCancer
Volume116
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Terminal Care
Physicians
Terminally Ill
Hospices
Neoplasms
Emotions
Multivariate Analysis
Logistic Models
Guidelines
Therapeutics
Research

Keywords

  • End-of-life care
  • Hospice
  • Physician survey
  • Prognosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Keating, N. L., Landrum, M. B., Rogers, S. O., Baum, S. K., Virnig, B. A., Huskamp, H. A., ... Kahn, K. L. (2010). Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care. Cancer, 116(4), 998-1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24761

Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care. / Keating, Nancy L.; Landrum, Mary Beth; Rogers, Selwyn O.; Baum, Susan K.; Virnig, Beth A.; Huskamp, Haiden A.; Earle, Craig C.; Kahn, Katherine L.

In: Cancer, Vol. 116, No. 4, 15.02.2010, p. 998-1006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Keating, NL, Landrum, MB, Rogers, SO, Baum, SK, Virnig, BA, Huskamp, HA, Earle, CC & Kahn, KL 2010, 'Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care', Cancer, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 998-1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24761
Keating NL, Landrum MB, Rogers SO, Baum SK, Virnig BA, Huskamp HA et al. Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care. Cancer. 2010 Feb 15;116(4):998-1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24761
Keating, Nancy L. ; Landrum, Mary Beth ; Rogers, Selwyn O. ; Baum, Susan K. ; Virnig, Beth A. ; Huskamp, Haiden A. ; Earle, Craig C. ; Kahn, Katherine L. / Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care. In: Cancer. 2010 ; Vol. 116, No. 4. pp. 998-1006.
@article{10d133ad7b59483eb58586e9cfb69b8c,
title = "Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend advanced care planning for terminally ill patients with <1 year to live. Few data are available regarding when physicians and their terminally ill patients typically discuss end-of-life issues. METHODS: A national survey was conducted of physicians caring for cancer patients about timing of discussions regarding prognosis, do not resuscitate (DNR) status, hospice, and preferred site of death with their terminally ill patients. Logistic regression was used to identify physician and practice characteristics associated with earlier discussions. RESULTS: Among 4074 respondents, 65{\%} would discuss prognosis {"}now{"} (defined as patient has 4 months to 6 months to live, asymptomatic). Fewer would discuss DNR status (44{\%}), hospice (26{\%}), or preferred site of death (21{\%}) immediately, with most physicians waiting for patient symptoms or until there are no more treatments to offer. In multivariate analyses, younger physicians more often discussed prognosis, DNR status, hospice, and site of death {"}now{"} (all P < .05). Surgeons and oncologists were more likely than noncancer specialists to discuss prognosis {"}now{"} (P = .008), but noncancer specialists were more likely than cancer specialists to discuss DNR status, hospice, and preferred site of death {"}now{"} (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians report they would not discuss end-oflife options with terminally ill patients who are feeling well, instead waiting for symptoms or until there are no more treatments to offer. More research is needed to understand physicians' reasons for timing of discussions and how their propensity to aggressively treat metastatic disease influences timing, as well as how the timing of discussions influences patient and family experiences at the end of life.",
keywords = "End-of-life care, Hospice, Physician survey, Prognosis",
author = "Keating, {Nancy L.} and Landrum, {Mary Beth} and Rogers, {Selwyn O.} and Baum, {Susan K.} and Virnig, {Beth A.} and Huskamp, {Haiden A.} and Earle, {Craig C.} and Kahn, {Katherine L.}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/cncr.24761",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "116",
pages = "998--1006",
journal = "Cancer",
issn = "0008-543X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care

AU - Keating, Nancy L.

AU - Landrum, Mary Beth

AU - Rogers, Selwyn O.

AU - Baum, Susan K.

AU - Virnig, Beth A.

AU - Huskamp, Haiden A.

AU - Earle, Craig C.

AU - Kahn, Katherine L.

PY - 2010/2/15

Y1 - 2010/2/15

N2 - BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend advanced care planning for terminally ill patients with <1 year to live. Few data are available regarding when physicians and their terminally ill patients typically discuss end-of-life issues. METHODS: A national survey was conducted of physicians caring for cancer patients about timing of discussions regarding prognosis, do not resuscitate (DNR) status, hospice, and preferred site of death with their terminally ill patients. Logistic regression was used to identify physician and practice characteristics associated with earlier discussions. RESULTS: Among 4074 respondents, 65% would discuss prognosis "now" (defined as patient has 4 months to 6 months to live, asymptomatic). Fewer would discuss DNR status (44%), hospice (26%), or preferred site of death (21%) immediately, with most physicians waiting for patient symptoms or until there are no more treatments to offer. In multivariate analyses, younger physicians more often discussed prognosis, DNR status, hospice, and site of death "now" (all P < .05). Surgeons and oncologists were more likely than noncancer specialists to discuss prognosis "now" (P = .008), but noncancer specialists were more likely than cancer specialists to discuss DNR status, hospice, and preferred site of death "now" (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians report they would not discuss end-oflife options with terminally ill patients who are feeling well, instead waiting for symptoms or until there are no more treatments to offer. More research is needed to understand physicians' reasons for timing of discussions and how their propensity to aggressively treat metastatic disease influences timing, as well as how the timing of discussions influences patient and family experiences at the end of life.

AB - BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend advanced care planning for terminally ill patients with <1 year to live. Few data are available regarding when physicians and their terminally ill patients typically discuss end-of-life issues. METHODS: A national survey was conducted of physicians caring for cancer patients about timing of discussions regarding prognosis, do not resuscitate (DNR) status, hospice, and preferred site of death with their terminally ill patients. Logistic regression was used to identify physician and practice characteristics associated with earlier discussions. RESULTS: Among 4074 respondents, 65% would discuss prognosis "now" (defined as patient has 4 months to 6 months to live, asymptomatic). Fewer would discuss DNR status (44%), hospice (26%), or preferred site of death (21%) immediately, with most physicians waiting for patient symptoms or until there are no more treatments to offer. In multivariate analyses, younger physicians more often discussed prognosis, DNR status, hospice, and site of death "now" (all P < .05). Surgeons and oncologists were more likely than noncancer specialists to discuss prognosis "now" (P = .008), but noncancer specialists were more likely than cancer specialists to discuss DNR status, hospice, and preferred site of death "now" (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians report they would not discuss end-oflife options with terminally ill patients who are feeling well, instead waiting for symptoms or until there are no more treatments to offer. More research is needed to understand physicians' reasons for timing of discussions and how their propensity to aggressively treat metastatic disease influences timing, as well as how the timing of discussions influences patient and family experiences at the end of life.

KW - End-of-life care

KW - Hospice

KW - Physician survey

KW - Prognosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76249133172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76249133172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cncr.24761

DO - 10.1002/cncr.24761

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 998

EP - 1006

JO - Cancer

JF - Cancer

SN - 0008-543X

IS - 4

ER -