Physician Recommendations and Patient Autonomy: Finding a Balance between Physician Power and Patient Choice

Timothy E. Quill, Howard Brody

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

471 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Medical care in the United States has rapidly moved away from a paternalistic approach to patients and toward an emphasis on patient autonomy. At one extreme end of this spectrum is the "independent choice" model of decision making, in which physicians objectively present patients with options and odds but withhold their own experience and recommendations to avoid overly influencing patients. This model confuses the concepts of independence and autonomy and assumes that the physician's exercise of power and influence inevitably diminishes the patient's ability to choose freely. It sacrifices competence for control, and it discourages active persuasion when differences of opinion exist between physician and patient. This paper proposes an "enhanced autonomy" model, which encourages patients and physicians to actively exchange ideas, explicitly negotiate differences, and share power and influence to serve the patient's best interests. Recommendations are offered that promote an intense collaboration between patient and physician so that patients can autonomously make choices that are informed by both the medical facts and the physician's experience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)763-769
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume125
Issue number9
StatePublished - Nov 1 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Physicians
Power (Psychology)
Persuasive Communication
Aptitude
Mental Competency
Decision Making
Exercise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Physician Recommendations and Patient Autonomy : Finding a Balance between Physician Power and Patient Choice. / Quill, Timothy E.; Brody, Howard.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 125, No. 9, 01.11.1996, p. 763-769.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8138236a1ef743b9b8c24794f153b268,
title = "Physician Recommendations and Patient Autonomy: Finding a Balance between Physician Power and Patient Choice",
abstract = "Medical care in the United States has rapidly moved away from a paternalistic approach to patients and toward an emphasis on patient autonomy. At one extreme end of this spectrum is the {"}independent choice{"} model of decision making, in which physicians objectively present patients with options and odds but withhold their own experience and recommendations to avoid overly influencing patients. This model confuses the concepts of independence and autonomy and assumes that the physician's exercise of power and influence inevitably diminishes the patient's ability to choose freely. It sacrifices competence for control, and it discourages active persuasion when differences of opinion exist between physician and patient. This paper proposes an {"}enhanced autonomy{"} model, which encourages patients and physicians to actively exchange ideas, explicitly negotiate differences, and share power and influence to serve the patient's best interests. Recommendations are offered that promote an intense collaboration between patient and physician so that patients can autonomously make choices that are informed by both the medical facts and the physician's experience.",
author = "Quill, {Timothy E.} and Howard Brody",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "125",
pages = "763--769",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physician Recommendations and Patient Autonomy

T2 - Finding a Balance between Physician Power and Patient Choice

AU - Quill, Timothy E.

AU - Brody, Howard

PY - 1996/11/1

Y1 - 1996/11/1

N2 - Medical care in the United States has rapidly moved away from a paternalistic approach to patients and toward an emphasis on patient autonomy. At one extreme end of this spectrum is the "independent choice" model of decision making, in which physicians objectively present patients with options and odds but withhold their own experience and recommendations to avoid overly influencing patients. This model confuses the concepts of independence and autonomy and assumes that the physician's exercise of power and influence inevitably diminishes the patient's ability to choose freely. It sacrifices competence for control, and it discourages active persuasion when differences of opinion exist between physician and patient. This paper proposes an "enhanced autonomy" model, which encourages patients and physicians to actively exchange ideas, explicitly negotiate differences, and share power and influence to serve the patient's best interests. Recommendations are offered that promote an intense collaboration between patient and physician so that patients can autonomously make choices that are informed by both the medical facts and the physician's experience.

AB - Medical care in the United States has rapidly moved away from a paternalistic approach to patients and toward an emphasis on patient autonomy. At one extreme end of this spectrum is the "independent choice" model of decision making, in which physicians objectively present patients with options and odds but withhold their own experience and recommendations to avoid overly influencing patients. This model confuses the concepts of independence and autonomy and assumes that the physician's exercise of power and influence inevitably diminishes the patient's ability to choose freely. It sacrifices competence for control, and it discourages active persuasion when differences of opinion exist between physician and patient. This paper proposes an "enhanced autonomy" model, which encourages patients and physicians to actively exchange ideas, explicitly negotiate differences, and share power and influence to serve the patient's best interests. Recommendations are offered that promote an intense collaboration between patient and physician so that patients can autonomously make choices that are informed by both the medical facts and the physician's experience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030294266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030294266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8929011

AN - SCOPUS:0030294266

VL - 125

SP - 763

EP - 769

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 9

ER -