Physicians' choice in using Internet and fax for patient recruitment and follow-up in a randomized controlled trial

Mahbubur Rahman, S. Morita, T. Fukui, J. Sakamoto

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    7 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Objective: To examine the physicians' preference between Web and fax-based remote data entry (RDE) system for an ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Japan. Methods: We conducted a survey among all the collaborating physicians (n = 512) of the CASE-J (Candesartan Antihypertensive Survival Evaluation in Japan) trial, who have been recruiting patients and sending follow-up data using the Web or a fax-based RDE system. The survey instrument assessed physicians' choice between Web and fax-based RDE systems, their practice pattern, and attitudes towards these two modalities. Results: A total of 448 (87.5%) responses were received. The proportions of physicians who used Web, fax, and the combination of these two were 45.9%, 33.3% and 20.8%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that physicians 55 years or younger [odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-3.3] and regular users of computers (OR = 4.2, 95% CI = 2.1-8.2) were more likely to use the Web-based RDE system. Conclusions: This information would be useful in designing on RCT with a Web-based RDE system in Japan and abroad.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)268-272
    Number of pages5
    JournalMethods of Information in Medicine
    Volume43
    Issue number3
    StatePublished - Jul 26 2004

    Keywords

    • Fax
    • Patient recruitment
    • Physicians' choice
    • Rondomized controlled trial
    • Web

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Health Informatics
    • Advanced and Specialized Nursing
    • Health Information Management

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Physicians' choice in using Internet and fax for patient recruitment and follow-up in a randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this