Point and counterpoint. Is it beneficial for ethics committee functions to be mandated in statutes and/or regulations?

B. D. Reeves, H. Brody

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)324-327
Number of pages4
JournalHEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals" ethical and legal issues
Volume4
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

jurisprudence
statute
moral philosophy
regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{878156896ab4477ca1bd57268ae26526,
title = "Point and counterpoint. Is it beneficial for ethics committee functions to be mandated in statutes and/or regulations?",
author = "Reeves, {B. D.} and H. Brody",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "324--327",
journal = "HEC Forum",
issn = "0956-2737",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Point and counterpoint. Is it beneficial for ethics committee functions to be mandated in statutes and/or regulations?

AU - Reeves, B. D.

AU - Brody, H.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026621704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026621704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10122334

AN - SCOPUS:0026621704

VL - 4

SP - 324

EP - 327

JO - HEC Forum

JF - HEC Forum

SN - 0956-2737

IS - 5

ER -