### Abstract

The availability of personal computer programs for individualising drug dosage regimens has stimulated interest in modelling population pharmacokinetics. Appropriate use of population models requires knowledge of the distribution of their pharmacokinetic parameter values. If non-Gaussian, it is imperative not to assume that the arithmetic mean is the best measure of central tendency. This has important consequences for therapeutic drug monitoring and for individualising drug dosage regimens. Utilising a new nonparametric expectation maximisation (NPEM) population modelling program and retrospective data from 129 preterm infants who received gentamicin in our own clinical setting, we developed 2 population models. The NPEM algorithm showed that both had significant non-Gaussian distributions of their parameter values (e.g. the mean value for the volume of distribution exceeded the 75th percentile). Although the median parameter values demonstrated only slightly better predictive accuracy than the mean, its choice as the measure of central tendency was associated with excellent agreement between the goal and the subsequently observed average initial peak serum gentamicin concentrations (i.e. 6.0 vs 6.2 mg/L). In contrast, simulation using the mean parameter values predicted an average concentration 30% greater than the goal (i.e. 8.0 vs 6.0 mg/L). Thus, for this group of patients, the median proved a better measure of central tendency.

Original language | English (US) |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 206-211 |

Number of pages | 6 |

Journal | Drug Investigation |

Volume | 5 |

Issue number | 4 |

State | Published - 1993 |

### Fingerprint

### ASJC Scopus subject areas

- Pharmacology (medical)

### Cite this

*Drug Investigation*,

*5*(4), 206-211.

**Population pharmacokinetic models. Measures of central tendency.** / Dodge, W. F.; Jelliffe, R. W.; Richardson, Carol; Bellanger, R. A.; Hokanson, J. A.; Snodgrass, W. R.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

*Drug Investigation*, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 206-211.

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Population pharmacokinetic models. Measures of central tendency

AU - Dodge, W. F.

AU - Jelliffe, R. W.

AU - Richardson, Carol

AU - Bellanger, R. A.

AU - Hokanson, J. A.

AU - Snodgrass, W. R.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - The availability of personal computer programs for individualising drug dosage regimens has stimulated interest in modelling population pharmacokinetics. Appropriate use of population models requires knowledge of the distribution of their pharmacokinetic parameter values. If non-Gaussian, it is imperative not to assume that the arithmetic mean is the best measure of central tendency. This has important consequences for therapeutic drug monitoring and for individualising drug dosage regimens. Utilising a new nonparametric expectation maximisation (NPEM) population modelling program and retrospective data from 129 preterm infants who received gentamicin in our own clinical setting, we developed 2 population models. The NPEM algorithm showed that both had significant non-Gaussian distributions of their parameter values (e.g. the mean value for the volume of distribution exceeded the 75th percentile). Although the median parameter values demonstrated only slightly better predictive accuracy than the mean, its choice as the measure of central tendency was associated with excellent agreement between the goal and the subsequently observed average initial peak serum gentamicin concentrations (i.e. 6.0 vs 6.2 mg/L). In contrast, simulation using the mean parameter values predicted an average concentration 30% greater than the goal (i.e. 8.0 vs 6.0 mg/L). Thus, for this group of patients, the median proved a better measure of central tendency.

AB - The availability of personal computer programs for individualising drug dosage regimens has stimulated interest in modelling population pharmacokinetics. Appropriate use of population models requires knowledge of the distribution of their pharmacokinetic parameter values. If non-Gaussian, it is imperative not to assume that the arithmetic mean is the best measure of central tendency. This has important consequences for therapeutic drug monitoring and for individualising drug dosage regimens. Utilising a new nonparametric expectation maximisation (NPEM) population modelling program and retrospective data from 129 preterm infants who received gentamicin in our own clinical setting, we developed 2 population models. The NPEM algorithm showed that both had significant non-Gaussian distributions of their parameter values (e.g. the mean value for the volume of distribution exceeded the 75th percentile). Although the median parameter values demonstrated only slightly better predictive accuracy than the mean, its choice as the measure of central tendency was associated with excellent agreement between the goal and the subsequently observed average initial peak serum gentamicin concentrations (i.e. 6.0 vs 6.2 mg/L). In contrast, simulation using the mean parameter values predicted an average concentration 30% greater than the goal (i.e. 8.0 vs 6.0 mg/L). Thus, for this group of patients, the median proved a better measure of central tendency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027470043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027470043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 206

EP - 211

JO - Clinical Drug Investigation

JF - Clinical Drug Investigation

SN - 1173-2563

IS - 4

ER -