Population standards of birth weight underestimate fetal growth abnormalities in diabetic pregnancies

Benjamin A. Kase, Clint M. Cormier, Maged Costantine, Maria Hutchinson, Susan M. Ramin, George Saade, Manju Monga, Sean C. Blackwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of abnormal fetal growth in women with diabetes mellitus (DM) using population-based birth weight (pop BW) percentiles compared with customized birth weight (cust BW) percentiles, which include adjustments for maternal race, parity, height, weight, and fetal sex. The study design comprised a retrospective cohort of singleton DM pregnancies delivered over a 1-year period (June 2007 to May 2008) from a single tertiary care university-based medical center. Inclusion criteria were gestational age >20 weeks at delivery, live birth, and absence of major chromosomal/structural abnormalities. Small for gestational age (SGA), <10th percentile, and large for gestational age (LGA), >90th percentile pregnancies were categorized based on pop BW or cust BW standards. There were significant differences in the rates of SGA (p<0.004) and LGA (p<0.001) between cust BW and pop BW methods. When comparing the two methods, pop BW did not identify 13/16 (81%) of SGA and 23/39 (59%) of LGA babies defined by cust BW methods. The use of cust BW calculation in a diabetic population identified a greater percentage of neonates with pathologic fetal growth compared with pop BW standards, suggesting that the population standard may underdiagnose abnormal fetal growth in diabetic pregnancies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-152
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Perinatology
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Pregnancy in Diabetics
Fetal Development
Birth Weight
Population
Gestational Age
Diabetes Mellitus
Pregnancy
Fetal Weight
Live Birth
Tertiary Healthcare
Parity
Chromosome Aberrations
Mothers
Newborn Infant

Keywords

  • customized birth weight
  • diabetes
  • gestational diabetes
  • large for gestational age
  • small for gestational age

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Kase, B. A., Cormier, C. M., Costantine, M., Hutchinson, M., Ramin, S. M., Saade, G., ... Blackwell, S. C. (2012). Population standards of birth weight underestimate fetal growth abnormalities in diabetic pregnancies. American Journal of Perinatology, 29(2), 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1295656

Population standards of birth weight underestimate fetal growth abnormalities in diabetic pregnancies. / Kase, Benjamin A.; Cormier, Clint M.; Costantine, Maged; Hutchinson, Maria; Ramin, Susan M.; Saade, George; Monga, Manju; Blackwell, Sean C.

In: American Journal of Perinatology, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2012, p. 147-152.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kase, BA, Cormier, CM, Costantine, M, Hutchinson, M, Ramin, SM, Saade, G, Monga, M & Blackwell, SC 2012, 'Population standards of birth weight underestimate fetal growth abnormalities in diabetic pregnancies', American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1295656
Kase, Benjamin A. ; Cormier, Clint M. ; Costantine, Maged ; Hutchinson, Maria ; Ramin, Susan M. ; Saade, George ; Monga, Manju ; Blackwell, Sean C. / Population standards of birth weight underestimate fetal growth abnormalities in diabetic pregnancies. In: American Journal of Perinatology. 2012 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 147-152.
@article{d90e504bef684820a51b55dfcb2d815e,
title = "Population standards of birth weight underestimate fetal growth abnormalities in diabetic pregnancies",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of abnormal fetal growth in women with diabetes mellitus (DM) using population-based birth weight (pop BW) percentiles compared with customized birth weight (cust BW) percentiles, which include adjustments for maternal race, parity, height, weight, and fetal sex. The study design comprised a retrospective cohort of singleton DM pregnancies delivered over a 1-year period (June 2007 to May 2008) from a single tertiary care university-based medical center. Inclusion criteria were gestational age >20 weeks at delivery, live birth, and absence of major chromosomal/structural abnormalities. Small for gestational age (SGA), <10th percentile, and large for gestational age (LGA), >90th percentile pregnancies were categorized based on pop BW or cust BW standards. There were significant differences in the rates of SGA (p<0.004) and LGA (p<0.001) between cust BW and pop BW methods. When comparing the two methods, pop BW did not identify 13/16 (81{\%}) of SGA and 23/39 (59{\%}) of LGA babies defined by cust BW methods. The use of cust BW calculation in a diabetic population identified a greater percentage of neonates with pathologic fetal growth compared with pop BW standards, suggesting that the population standard may underdiagnose abnormal fetal growth in diabetic pregnancies.",
keywords = "customized birth weight, diabetes, gestational diabetes, large for gestational age, small for gestational age",
author = "Kase, {Benjamin A.} and Cormier, {Clint M.} and Maged Costantine and Maria Hutchinson and Ramin, {Susan M.} and George Saade and Manju Monga and Blackwell, {Sean C.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1055/s-0031-1295656",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "147--152",
journal = "American Journal of Perinatology",
issn = "0735-1631",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Population standards of birth weight underestimate fetal growth abnormalities in diabetic pregnancies

AU - Kase, Benjamin A.

AU - Cormier, Clint M.

AU - Costantine, Maged

AU - Hutchinson, Maria

AU - Ramin, Susan M.

AU - Saade, George

AU - Monga, Manju

AU - Blackwell, Sean C.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of abnormal fetal growth in women with diabetes mellitus (DM) using population-based birth weight (pop BW) percentiles compared with customized birth weight (cust BW) percentiles, which include adjustments for maternal race, parity, height, weight, and fetal sex. The study design comprised a retrospective cohort of singleton DM pregnancies delivered over a 1-year period (June 2007 to May 2008) from a single tertiary care university-based medical center. Inclusion criteria were gestational age >20 weeks at delivery, live birth, and absence of major chromosomal/structural abnormalities. Small for gestational age (SGA), <10th percentile, and large for gestational age (LGA), >90th percentile pregnancies were categorized based on pop BW or cust BW standards. There were significant differences in the rates of SGA (p<0.004) and LGA (p<0.001) between cust BW and pop BW methods. When comparing the two methods, pop BW did not identify 13/16 (81%) of SGA and 23/39 (59%) of LGA babies defined by cust BW methods. The use of cust BW calculation in a diabetic population identified a greater percentage of neonates with pathologic fetal growth compared with pop BW standards, suggesting that the population standard may underdiagnose abnormal fetal growth in diabetic pregnancies.

AB - The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of abnormal fetal growth in women with diabetes mellitus (DM) using population-based birth weight (pop BW) percentiles compared with customized birth weight (cust BW) percentiles, which include adjustments for maternal race, parity, height, weight, and fetal sex. The study design comprised a retrospective cohort of singleton DM pregnancies delivered over a 1-year period (June 2007 to May 2008) from a single tertiary care university-based medical center. Inclusion criteria were gestational age >20 weeks at delivery, live birth, and absence of major chromosomal/structural abnormalities. Small for gestational age (SGA), <10th percentile, and large for gestational age (LGA), >90th percentile pregnancies were categorized based on pop BW or cust BW standards. There were significant differences in the rates of SGA (p<0.004) and LGA (p<0.001) between cust BW and pop BW methods. When comparing the two methods, pop BW did not identify 13/16 (81%) of SGA and 23/39 (59%) of LGA babies defined by cust BW methods. The use of cust BW calculation in a diabetic population identified a greater percentage of neonates with pathologic fetal growth compared with pop BW standards, suggesting that the population standard may underdiagnose abnormal fetal growth in diabetic pregnancies.

KW - customized birth weight

KW - diabetes

KW - gestational diabetes

KW - large for gestational age

KW - small for gestational age

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857051516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857051516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0031-1295656

DO - 10.1055/s-0031-1295656

M3 - Article

C2 - 22105433

AN - SCOPUS:84857051516

VL - 29

SP - 147

EP - 152

JO - American Journal of Perinatology

JF - American Journal of Perinatology

SN - 0735-1631

IS - 2

ER -