Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a commonly used adjunct to mechanical ventilation and is known to have deleterious effects on cardiac output (CO). Its effects on regional blood flow are not well known. We evaluated the effect of PEEP on the mesenteric microcirculation and CO. Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with mechanical ventilation and either no PEEP (Control) or increasing levels of PEEP (PEEP). Using in vivo video- microscopy, mesenteric A1 arteriolar optical Doppler velocities and A1 and A3 (the first- and third-order arterioles branching off the feeding mesenteric arcade) intraluminal diameters were measured (n = 6/group). In a separate set of experimental animals, CO was determined by thermodilution technique (n = 5/group). Additionally, after the PEEP group attained a PEEP level of 20-cm H2O PEEP, two boluses of 2 mL 0.9 normal saline (NS) were given intravenously. The Control groups had the same determinations performed over the same time course as the PEEP group but were not exposed to any PEEP. Mesenteric blood flow (MBF) was calculated from vessel diameter and red blood cell velocity. The MBF and CO fell progressively as PEEP was increased from 10- to 15- to 20-cm H2O pressure. MBF was reduced 75% (p < 0.05) and the CO was reduced 31% (p < 0.05) from baseline at 20-cm H2O pressure PEEP. After 4 mL normal saline, the MBF was still 45% below baseline (p < 0.05) while the CO had returned to baseline. In conclusion, both MBF and CO are decreased significantly with increasing PEEP. Fluid resuscitation will reverse the adverse effects of PEEP on CO, but there is only partial correction of the negative effects on MBF.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||5|
|Journal||Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care|
|State||Published - Sep 12 1995|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine