POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: Implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection

Anthony J. Senagore, Anthony J. Warmuth, Conor P. Delaney, Paris P. Tekkis, Victor W. Fazio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM), Portsmouth revision (p)-POSSUM, and colorectal (Cr)-POSSUM scoring systems were developed as audit tools for comparing outcomes in surgical and colorectal patients on the basis of operative risk assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of these systems to a cohort of colon cancer patients undergoing surgery in the United States. METHODS: POSSUM factors from 890 consecutive patients undergoing major surgical procedures for colon cancer in nine United States hospitals over a two-year period from January 2000 through December 2001 were prospectively collected. The observed over the expected hospital mortality was compared by means of the POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems. The effect of missing data on the utility of this process for outcome assessment was assessed with three methods for data imputation. RESULTS: The number of resections per institution ranged from 13 to 437. The observed mortality rate ranged from 0.8 percent to 15.4 percent among the institutions, with an overall operative mortality of 2.3 percent. The POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM predicted mortality was 10.7 percent, 11.2 percent, and 4.9 percent, respectively. The POSSUM and p-POSSUM models overpredicted mortality in all institutions (P <0.01), whereas the Cr-POSSUM demonstrated an observed over expected hospital mortality ratio of > 1 in three institutions. The calculations were unaffected by the various methods of inserting missing data. CONCLUSION: An apparent overprediction of mortality for colon cancer resection was evident with all three POSSUM variants. This implies that a calibration process is required for use of these variants in the United States health care system. Missing data may be treated as normal values without influencing outcome. The Cr-POSSUM appeared to be the most promising audit tool for colorectal cancer surgery; however, it will require further refinement to provide process control graphs for identification of potential outliers and improvement in the quality of care in the United States.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1435-1441
Number of pages7
JournalDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume47
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colonic Neoplasms
Delivery of Health Care
Mortality
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Colorectal Surgery
State Hospitals
Quality of Health Care
Hospital Mortality
Calibration
Colorectal Neoplasms
Reference Values
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Colon cancer
  • Outcomes
  • POSSUM score
  • Scoring systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM : Implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection. / Senagore, Anthony J.; Warmuth, Anthony J.; Delaney, Conor P.; Tekkis, Paris P.; Fazio, Victor W.

In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, Vol. 47, No. 9, 09.2004, p. 1435-1441.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Senagore, Anthony J. ; Warmuth, Anthony J. ; Delaney, Conor P. ; Tekkis, Paris P. ; Fazio, Victor W. / POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM : Implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection. In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2004 ; Vol. 47, No. 9. pp. 1435-1441.
@article{18508ac946564a71847c55dfddc3a896,
title = "POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: Implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection",
abstract = "PURPOSE: The Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM), Portsmouth revision (p)-POSSUM, and colorectal (Cr)-POSSUM scoring systems were developed as audit tools for comparing outcomes in surgical and colorectal patients on the basis of operative risk assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of these systems to a cohort of colon cancer patients undergoing surgery in the United States. METHODS: POSSUM factors from 890 consecutive patients undergoing major surgical procedures for colon cancer in nine United States hospitals over a two-year period from January 2000 through December 2001 were prospectively collected. The observed over the expected hospital mortality was compared by means of the POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems. The effect of missing data on the utility of this process for outcome assessment was assessed with three methods for data imputation. RESULTS: The number of resections per institution ranged from 13 to 437. The observed mortality rate ranged from 0.8 percent to 15.4 percent among the institutions, with an overall operative mortality of 2.3 percent. The POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM predicted mortality was 10.7 percent, 11.2 percent, and 4.9 percent, respectively. The POSSUM and p-POSSUM models overpredicted mortality in all institutions (P <0.01), whereas the Cr-POSSUM demonstrated an observed over expected hospital mortality ratio of > 1 in three institutions. The calculations were unaffected by the various methods of inserting missing data. CONCLUSION: An apparent overprediction of mortality for colon cancer resection was evident with all three POSSUM variants. This implies that a calibration process is required for use of these variants in the United States health care system. Missing data may be treated as normal values without influencing outcome. The Cr-POSSUM appeared to be the most promising audit tool for colorectal cancer surgery; however, it will require further refinement to provide process control graphs for identification of potential outliers and improvement in the quality of care in the United States.",
keywords = "Colon cancer, Outcomes, POSSUM score, Scoring systems",
author = "Senagore, {Anthony J.} and Warmuth, {Anthony J.} and Delaney, {Conor P.} and Tekkis, {Paris P.} and Fazio, {Victor W.}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s10350-004-0604-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "1435--1441",
journal = "Diseases of the Colon and Rectum",
issn = "0012-3706",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM

T2 - Implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection

AU - Senagore, Anthony J.

AU - Warmuth, Anthony J.

AU - Delaney, Conor P.

AU - Tekkis, Paris P.

AU - Fazio, Victor W.

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - PURPOSE: The Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM), Portsmouth revision (p)-POSSUM, and colorectal (Cr)-POSSUM scoring systems were developed as audit tools for comparing outcomes in surgical and colorectal patients on the basis of operative risk assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of these systems to a cohort of colon cancer patients undergoing surgery in the United States. METHODS: POSSUM factors from 890 consecutive patients undergoing major surgical procedures for colon cancer in nine United States hospitals over a two-year period from January 2000 through December 2001 were prospectively collected. The observed over the expected hospital mortality was compared by means of the POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems. The effect of missing data on the utility of this process for outcome assessment was assessed with three methods for data imputation. RESULTS: The number of resections per institution ranged from 13 to 437. The observed mortality rate ranged from 0.8 percent to 15.4 percent among the institutions, with an overall operative mortality of 2.3 percent. The POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM predicted mortality was 10.7 percent, 11.2 percent, and 4.9 percent, respectively. The POSSUM and p-POSSUM models overpredicted mortality in all institutions (P <0.01), whereas the Cr-POSSUM demonstrated an observed over expected hospital mortality ratio of > 1 in three institutions. The calculations were unaffected by the various methods of inserting missing data. CONCLUSION: An apparent overprediction of mortality for colon cancer resection was evident with all three POSSUM variants. This implies that a calibration process is required for use of these variants in the United States health care system. Missing data may be treated as normal values without influencing outcome. The Cr-POSSUM appeared to be the most promising audit tool for colorectal cancer surgery; however, it will require further refinement to provide process control graphs for identification of potential outliers and improvement in the quality of care in the United States.

AB - PURPOSE: The Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM), Portsmouth revision (p)-POSSUM, and colorectal (Cr)-POSSUM scoring systems were developed as audit tools for comparing outcomes in surgical and colorectal patients on the basis of operative risk assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of these systems to a cohort of colon cancer patients undergoing surgery in the United States. METHODS: POSSUM factors from 890 consecutive patients undergoing major surgical procedures for colon cancer in nine United States hospitals over a two-year period from January 2000 through December 2001 were prospectively collected. The observed over the expected hospital mortality was compared by means of the POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems. The effect of missing data on the utility of this process for outcome assessment was assessed with three methods for data imputation. RESULTS: The number of resections per institution ranged from 13 to 437. The observed mortality rate ranged from 0.8 percent to 15.4 percent among the institutions, with an overall operative mortality of 2.3 percent. The POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM predicted mortality was 10.7 percent, 11.2 percent, and 4.9 percent, respectively. The POSSUM and p-POSSUM models overpredicted mortality in all institutions (P <0.01), whereas the Cr-POSSUM demonstrated an observed over expected hospital mortality ratio of > 1 in three institutions. The calculations were unaffected by the various methods of inserting missing data. CONCLUSION: An apparent overprediction of mortality for colon cancer resection was evident with all three POSSUM variants. This implies that a calibration process is required for use of these variants in the United States health care system. Missing data may be treated as normal values without influencing outcome. The Cr-POSSUM appeared to be the most promising audit tool for colorectal cancer surgery; however, it will require further refinement to provide process control graphs for identification of potential outliers and improvement in the quality of care in the United States.

KW - Colon cancer

KW - Outcomes

KW - POSSUM score

KW - Scoring systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4644271724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4644271724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10350-004-0604-1

DO - 10.1007/s10350-004-0604-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 15486738

AN - SCOPUS:4644271724

VL - 47

SP - 1435

EP - 1441

JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

SN - 0012-3706

IS - 9

ER -