Postacute Care Setting Is Associated With Employment After Burn Injury

Leda F. Espinoza, Laura C. Simko, Richard Goldstein, Kara A. McMullen, C. Slocum, Julie K. Silver, David Herndon, Oscar Suman, Walter Meyer, Nicole S. Gibran, K. Kowalske, Ross Zafonte, Colleen M. Ryan, Jeffrey C. Schneider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To examine differences in long-term employment outcomes in the postacute care setting. Design: Retrospective review of the prospectively collected Burn Model System National Database. Setting and Participants: A total of 695 adult survivors of burn injury enrolled between May 1994 and June 2016 who required postacute care at a Burn Model System center following acute care discharge were included. Participants were divided into 2 groups based on acute care discharge disposition. Those who received postacute care at an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) following acute care were included in the IRF group (N=447), and those who were treated at a skilled nursing facility, long-term care hospital, or other extended-care facility following acute care were included in the Other Rehab group (N=248). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Employment status at 12 months postinjury. Propensity score matching and logistic regression were utilized to determine the effect of postacute care setting on employment status. Results: Individuals in the IRF group had larger burns and were more likely to have an inhalation injury and to undergo amputation. At 12 months postinjury, the IRF group had over 9 times increased odds of being employed compared to the Other Rehab group, using propensity score matching (P=.046). Conclusions: While admitting patients with more severe injuries, IRFs provided a long-term benefit for survivors of burn injury in terms of regaining employment. Given the current lack of evidence-based guidelines on postacute care decisions, the results of this study shed light on the potential benefits of the intensive services provided at IRFs in this population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Subacute Care
Inpatients
Rehabilitation
Skilled Nursing Facilities
Wounds and Injuries
Propensity Score
Survivors
Long-Term Care
Burns
Amputation
Inhalation
Logistic Models
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Guidelines
Population

Keywords

  • Employment
  • Postacute care
  • Rehabilitation
  • Skilled nursing facilities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Espinoza, L. F., Simko, L. C., Goldstein, R., McMullen, K. A., Slocum, C., Silver, J. K., ... Schneider, J. C. (2019). Postacute Care Setting Is Associated With Employment After Burn Injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.007

Postacute Care Setting Is Associated With Employment After Burn Injury. / Espinoza, Leda F.; Simko, Laura C.; Goldstein, Richard; McMullen, Kara A.; Slocum, C.; Silver, Julie K.; Herndon, David; Suman, Oscar; Meyer, Walter; Gibran, Nicole S.; Kowalske, K.; Zafonte, Ross; Ryan, Colleen M.; Schneider, Jeffrey C.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Espinoza, LF, Simko, LC, Goldstein, R, McMullen, KA, Slocum, C, Silver, JK, Herndon, D, Suman, O, Meyer, W, Gibran, NS, Kowalske, K, Zafonte, R, Ryan, CM & Schneider, JC 2019, 'Postacute Care Setting Is Associated With Employment After Burn Injury', Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.007
Espinoza, Leda F. ; Simko, Laura C. ; Goldstein, Richard ; McMullen, Kara A. ; Slocum, C. ; Silver, Julie K. ; Herndon, David ; Suman, Oscar ; Meyer, Walter ; Gibran, Nicole S. ; Kowalske, K. ; Zafonte, Ross ; Ryan, Colleen M. ; Schneider, Jeffrey C. / Postacute Care Setting Is Associated With Employment After Burn Injury. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2019.
@article{6d8be645eb7b441b8bfc89080f177e94,
title = "Postacute Care Setting Is Associated With Employment After Burn Injury",
abstract = "Objective: To examine differences in long-term employment outcomes in the postacute care setting. Design: Retrospective review of the prospectively collected Burn Model System National Database. Setting and Participants: A total of 695 adult survivors of burn injury enrolled between May 1994 and June 2016 who required postacute care at a Burn Model System center following acute care discharge were included. Participants were divided into 2 groups based on acute care discharge disposition. Those who received postacute care at an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) following acute care were included in the IRF group (N=447), and those who were treated at a skilled nursing facility, long-term care hospital, or other extended-care facility following acute care were included in the Other Rehab group (N=248). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Employment status at 12 months postinjury. Propensity score matching and logistic regression were utilized to determine the effect of postacute care setting on employment status. Results: Individuals in the IRF group had larger burns and were more likely to have an inhalation injury and to undergo amputation. At 12 months postinjury, the IRF group had over 9 times increased odds of being employed compared to the Other Rehab group, using propensity score matching (P=.046). Conclusions: While admitting patients with more severe injuries, IRFs provided a long-term benefit for survivors of burn injury in terms of regaining employment. Given the current lack of evidence-based guidelines on postacute care decisions, the results of this study shed light on the potential benefits of the intensive services provided at IRFs in this population.",
keywords = "Employment, Postacute care, Rehabilitation, Skilled nursing facilities",
author = "Espinoza, {Leda F.} and Simko, {Laura C.} and Richard Goldstein and McMullen, {Kara A.} and C. Slocum and Silver, {Julie K.} and David Herndon and Oscar Suman and Walter Meyer and Gibran, {Nicole S.} and K. Kowalske and Ross Zafonte and Ryan, {Colleen M.} and Schneider, {Jeffrey C.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.007",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postacute Care Setting Is Associated With Employment After Burn Injury

AU - Espinoza, Leda F.

AU - Simko, Laura C.

AU - Goldstein, Richard

AU - McMullen, Kara A.

AU - Slocum, C.

AU - Silver, Julie K.

AU - Herndon, David

AU - Suman, Oscar

AU - Meyer, Walter

AU - Gibran, Nicole S.

AU - Kowalske, K.

AU - Zafonte, Ross

AU - Ryan, Colleen M.

AU - Schneider, Jeffrey C.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To examine differences in long-term employment outcomes in the postacute care setting. Design: Retrospective review of the prospectively collected Burn Model System National Database. Setting and Participants: A total of 695 adult survivors of burn injury enrolled between May 1994 and June 2016 who required postacute care at a Burn Model System center following acute care discharge were included. Participants were divided into 2 groups based on acute care discharge disposition. Those who received postacute care at an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) following acute care were included in the IRF group (N=447), and those who were treated at a skilled nursing facility, long-term care hospital, or other extended-care facility following acute care were included in the Other Rehab group (N=248). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Employment status at 12 months postinjury. Propensity score matching and logistic regression were utilized to determine the effect of postacute care setting on employment status. Results: Individuals in the IRF group had larger burns and were more likely to have an inhalation injury and to undergo amputation. At 12 months postinjury, the IRF group had over 9 times increased odds of being employed compared to the Other Rehab group, using propensity score matching (P=.046). Conclusions: While admitting patients with more severe injuries, IRFs provided a long-term benefit for survivors of burn injury in terms of regaining employment. Given the current lack of evidence-based guidelines on postacute care decisions, the results of this study shed light on the potential benefits of the intensive services provided at IRFs in this population.

AB - Objective: To examine differences in long-term employment outcomes in the postacute care setting. Design: Retrospective review of the prospectively collected Burn Model System National Database. Setting and Participants: A total of 695 adult survivors of burn injury enrolled between May 1994 and June 2016 who required postacute care at a Burn Model System center following acute care discharge were included. Participants were divided into 2 groups based on acute care discharge disposition. Those who received postacute care at an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) following acute care were included in the IRF group (N=447), and those who were treated at a skilled nursing facility, long-term care hospital, or other extended-care facility following acute care were included in the Other Rehab group (N=248). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Employment status at 12 months postinjury. Propensity score matching and logistic regression were utilized to determine the effect of postacute care setting on employment status. Results: Individuals in the IRF group had larger burns and were more likely to have an inhalation injury and to undergo amputation. At 12 months postinjury, the IRF group had over 9 times increased odds of being employed compared to the Other Rehab group, using propensity score matching (P=.046). Conclusions: While admitting patients with more severe injuries, IRFs provided a long-term benefit for survivors of burn injury in terms of regaining employment. Given the current lack of evidence-based guidelines on postacute care decisions, the results of this study shed light on the potential benefits of the intensive services provided at IRFs in this population.

KW - Employment

KW - Postacute care

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Skilled nursing facilities

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069971436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069971436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.007

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.007

M3 - Article

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

ER -