Potentially preventable hospitalizations in medicare patients with diabetes

A comparison of primary care provided by nurse practitioners versus physicians

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Few comparisons exist of the quality of primary care provided by nurse practitioners (NPs) versus physicians. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of diabetes in 2007-2010 (n = 345,819) who received all primary care from NPs or from generalist physicians in a given year were selected from a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries. We compared the rate of potentially preventable hospitalizations among patients who received primary care from NPs versus generalist physicians. Various statistical methods-including multivariable analysis, inverse probability weighting of propensity score, nonpooling propensity score adjustment and matching, and instrumental variable (IV) analysis-were used to control for differences in patient characteristics between the 2 groups. Results: Patients who received all of their primary care from NPs or from physicians differed by age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, residential area, and number of provider visits in the previous year. Nonpooling propensity score matching substantially reduced the differences, but neither IV approach satisfactorily reduced the differences. In multivariable analyses, receipt of primary care from an NP was associated with a decreased risk of hospitalization for potentially preventable conditions (OR: 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.93). Similar results were found using conditional logistic regression models with propensity methods. We found smaller reductions in our analyses of "other hospitalizations" (OR: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.98). Both IV analyses showed associations between NP care and lower potentially preventable hospitalizations, but only 1 result was statistically significant. Conclusions: Using potentially preventable hospitalizations as a quality indicator, primary care provided by NPs was at least comparable with that provided by generalist physicians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)776-783
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Care
Volume53
Issue number9
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Nurse Practitioners
Medicare
Primary Health Care
Hospitalization
Physicians
Propensity Score
Logistic Models
Quality of Health Care
Social Class

Keywords

  • Comparative effectiveness research
  • Diabetes
  • Medicare
  • Nurse practitioners
  • Primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{e89b8b1ab19145259d1ba70545827036,
title = "Potentially preventable hospitalizations in medicare patients with diabetes: A comparison of primary care provided by nurse practitioners versus physicians",
abstract = "Background: Few comparisons exist of the quality of primary care provided by nurse practitioners (NPs) versus physicians. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of diabetes in 2007-2010 (n = 345,819) who received all primary care from NPs or from generalist physicians in a given year were selected from a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries. We compared the rate of potentially preventable hospitalizations among patients who received primary care from NPs versus generalist physicians. Various statistical methods-including multivariable analysis, inverse probability weighting of propensity score, nonpooling propensity score adjustment and matching, and instrumental variable (IV) analysis-were used to control for differences in patient characteristics between the 2 groups. Results: Patients who received all of their primary care from NPs or from physicians differed by age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, residential area, and number of provider visits in the previous year. Nonpooling propensity score matching substantially reduced the differences, but neither IV approach satisfactorily reduced the differences. In multivariable analyses, receipt of primary care from an NP was associated with a decreased risk of hospitalization for potentially preventable conditions (OR: 0.90; 95{\%} CI, 0.87-0.93). Similar results were found using conditional logistic regression models with propensity methods. We found smaller reductions in our analyses of {"}other hospitalizations{"} (OR: 0.96; 95{\%} CI, 0.95-0.98). Both IV analyses showed associations between NP care and lower potentially preventable hospitalizations, but only 1 result was statistically significant. Conclusions: Using potentially preventable hospitalizations as a quality indicator, primary care provided by NPs was at least comparable with that provided by generalist physicians.",
keywords = "Comparative effectiveness research, Diabetes, Medicare, Nurse practitioners, Primary care",
author = "Kuo, {Yong Fang} and Chen, {Nai Wei} and Jacques Baillargeon and Mukaila Raji and James Goodwin",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "776--783",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potentially preventable hospitalizations in medicare patients with diabetes

T2 - A comparison of primary care provided by nurse practitioners versus physicians

AU - Kuo, Yong Fang

AU - Chen, Nai Wei

AU - Baillargeon, Jacques

AU - Raji, Mukaila

AU - Goodwin, James

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: Few comparisons exist of the quality of primary care provided by nurse practitioners (NPs) versus physicians. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of diabetes in 2007-2010 (n = 345,819) who received all primary care from NPs or from generalist physicians in a given year were selected from a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries. We compared the rate of potentially preventable hospitalizations among patients who received primary care from NPs versus generalist physicians. Various statistical methods-including multivariable analysis, inverse probability weighting of propensity score, nonpooling propensity score adjustment and matching, and instrumental variable (IV) analysis-were used to control for differences in patient characteristics between the 2 groups. Results: Patients who received all of their primary care from NPs or from physicians differed by age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, residential area, and number of provider visits in the previous year. Nonpooling propensity score matching substantially reduced the differences, but neither IV approach satisfactorily reduced the differences. In multivariable analyses, receipt of primary care from an NP was associated with a decreased risk of hospitalization for potentially preventable conditions (OR: 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.93). Similar results were found using conditional logistic regression models with propensity methods. We found smaller reductions in our analyses of "other hospitalizations" (OR: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.98). Both IV analyses showed associations between NP care and lower potentially preventable hospitalizations, but only 1 result was statistically significant. Conclusions: Using potentially preventable hospitalizations as a quality indicator, primary care provided by NPs was at least comparable with that provided by generalist physicians.

AB - Background: Few comparisons exist of the quality of primary care provided by nurse practitioners (NPs) versus physicians. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of diabetes in 2007-2010 (n = 345,819) who received all primary care from NPs or from generalist physicians in a given year were selected from a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries. We compared the rate of potentially preventable hospitalizations among patients who received primary care from NPs versus generalist physicians. Various statistical methods-including multivariable analysis, inverse probability weighting of propensity score, nonpooling propensity score adjustment and matching, and instrumental variable (IV) analysis-were used to control for differences in patient characteristics between the 2 groups. Results: Patients who received all of their primary care from NPs or from physicians differed by age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, residential area, and number of provider visits in the previous year. Nonpooling propensity score matching substantially reduced the differences, but neither IV approach satisfactorily reduced the differences. In multivariable analyses, receipt of primary care from an NP was associated with a decreased risk of hospitalization for potentially preventable conditions (OR: 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.93). Similar results were found using conditional logistic regression models with propensity methods. We found smaller reductions in our analyses of "other hospitalizations" (OR: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.98). Both IV analyses showed associations between NP care and lower potentially preventable hospitalizations, but only 1 result was statistically significant. Conclusions: Using potentially preventable hospitalizations as a quality indicator, primary care provided by NPs was at least comparable with that provided by generalist physicians.

KW - Comparative effectiveness research

KW - Diabetes

KW - Medicare

KW - Nurse practitioners

KW - Primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942612912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942612912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 776

EP - 783

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 9

ER -