Practical Significance in Early Intervention Research

From Affect to Empirical Effect

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The practical significance of early intervention and developmental research was examined by computing measures of effect size for 237 statistical tests from 59 early intervention studies. Analysis of the data revealed that the average (median) treatment effect across the studies was in the range Cohen (1977) defines as a medium effect size (d index =.68). The distribution of treatment effect sizes was positively skewed with a large portion of treatment effects in the medium and small categories. The interpretation of measures of magnitude strength is discussed in relation to statistical significance testing. The argument is made that the evolving nature of early intervention research requires the use of analytic procedures sensitive to the degree of change expected in field-based dependent variables. Reporting measures of effect size along with traditional quantitative results will enhance the interpretation of statistical findings in early intervention and developmental research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-193
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Early Intervention
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Practical Significance in Early Intervention Research : From Affect to Empirical Effect. / Ottenbacher, Kenneth.

In: Journal of Early Intervention, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1992, p. 181-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b96b5971b42440e0a45f259c4eb0b764,
title = "Practical Significance in Early Intervention Research: From Affect to Empirical Effect",
abstract = "The practical significance of early intervention and developmental research was examined by computing measures of effect size for 237 statistical tests from 59 early intervention studies. Analysis of the data revealed that the average (median) treatment effect across the studies was in the range Cohen (1977) defines as a medium effect size (d index =.68). The distribution of treatment effect sizes was positively skewed with a large portion of treatment effects in the medium and small categories. The interpretation of measures of magnitude strength is discussed in relation to statistical significance testing. The argument is made that the evolving nature of early intervention research requires the use of analytic procedures sensitive to the degree of change expected in field-based dependent variables. Reporting measures of effect size along with traditional quantitative results will enhance the interpretation of statistical findings in early intervention and developmental research.",
author = "Kenneth Ottenbacher",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1177/105381519201600209",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "181--193",
journal = "Journal of Early Intervention",
issn = "1053-8151",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practical Significance in Early Intervention Research

T2 - From Affect to Empirical Effect

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - The practical significance of early intervention and developmental research was examined by computing measures of effect size for 237 statistical tests from 59 early intervention studies. Analysis of the data revealed that the average (median) treatment effect across the studies was in the range Cohen (1977) defines as a medium effect size (d index =.68). The distribution of treatment effect sizes was positively skewed with a large portion of treatment effects in the medium and small categories. The interpretation of measures of magnitude strength is discussed in relation to statistical significance testing. The argument is made that the evolving nature of early intervention research requires the use of analytic procedures sensitive to the degree of change expected in field-based dependent variables. Reporting measures of effect size along with traditional quantitative results will enhance the interpretation of statistical findings in early intervention and developmental research.

AB - The practical significance of early intervention and developmental research was examined by computing measures of effect size for 237 statistical tests from 59 early intervention studies. Analysis of the data revealed that the average (median) treatment effect across the studies was in the range Cohen (1977) defines as a medium effect size (d index =.68). The distribution of treatment effect sizes was positively skewed with a large portion of treatment effects in the medium and small categories. The interpretation of measures of magnitude strength is discussed in relation to statistical significance testing. The argument is made that the evolving nature of early intervention research requires the use of analytic procedures sensitive to the degree of change expected in field-based dependent variables. Reporting measures of effect size along with traditional quantitative results will enhance the interpretation of statistical findings in early intervention and developmental research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970154989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970154989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/105381519201600209

DO - 10.1177/105381519201600209

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 181

EP - 193

JO - Journal of Early Intervention

JF - Journal of Early Intervention

SN - 1053-8151

IS - 2

ER -