Practice effects during repeated administrations of memory tests with and without alternate forms

Ralph H B Benedict, Dennis J. Zgaljardic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

187 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research indicates that practice effects are large with repeated versions of memory tests. In contrast, administrations of the same tests using alternate forms typically yield much smaller practice effects. However, most studies do not compare alternate- and same-form conditions directly, and differ widely in terms of test-retest interval, modality of stimuli (verbal, spatial), format of the memory test, and number of examinations. The present study investigated practice effects during repeated administrations of verbal and nonverbal memory tests which have the same administration format. Two groups of healthy participants, matched for age, education, estimated IQ, and baseline memory test performance, were assigned to either a same- or alternate-forms condition. Participants taking the same form every two weeks improved significantly over four sessions. Participants completing alternate forms of the nonverbal memory test produced a small practice gain, but the verbal memory test was resistant to practice effects when alternate forms were used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)339-352
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Volume20
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Healthy Volunteers
Practice (Psychology)
Education
Research
Spatial Memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Practice effects during repeated administrations of memory tests with and without alternate forms. / Benedict, Ralph H B; Zgaljardic, Dennis J.

In: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1998, p. 339-352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d9f966e34fb46978fbd6db2e0585164,
title = "Practice effects during repeated administrations of memory tests with and without alternate forms",
abstract = "Previous research indicates that practice effects are large with repeated versions of memory tests. In contrast, administrations of the same tests using alternate forms typically yield much smaller practice effects. However, most studies do not compare alternate- and same-form conditions directly, and differ widely in terms of test-retest interval, modality of stimuli (verbal, spatial), format of the memory test, and number of examinations. The present study investigated practice effects during repeated administrations of verbal and nonverbal memory tests which have the same administration format. Two groups of healthy participants, matched for age, education, estimated IQ, and baseline memory test performance, were assigned to either a same- or alternate-forms condition. Participants taking the same form every two weeks improved significantly over four sessions. Participants completing alternate forms of the nonverbal memory test produced a small practice gain, but the verbal memory test was resistant to practice effects when alternate forms were used.",
author = "Benedict, {Ralph H B} and Zgaljardic, {Dennis J.}",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "339--352",
journal = "Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology",
issn = "0168-8634",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practice effects during repeated administrations of memory tests with and without alternate forms

AU - Benedict, Ralph H B

AU - Zgaljardic, Dennis J.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Previous research indicates that practice effects are large with repeated versions of memory tests. In contrast, administrations of the same tests using alternate forms typically yield much smaller practice effects. However, most studies do not compare alternate- and same-form conditions directly, and differ widely in terms of test-retest interval, modality of stimuli (verbal, spatial), format of the memory test, and number of examinations. The present study investigated practice effects during repeated administrations of verbal and nonverbal memory tests which have the same administration format. Two groups of healthy participants, matched for age, education, estimated IQ, and baseline memory test performance, were assigned to either a same- or alternate-forms condition. Participants taking the same form every two weeks improved significantly over four sessions. Participants completing alternate forms of the nonverbal memory test produced a small practice gain, but the verbal memory test was resistant to practice effects when alternate forms were used.

AB - Previous research indicates that practice effects are large with repeated versions of memory tests. In contrast, administrations of the same tests using alternate forms typically yield much smaller practice effects. However, most studies do not compare alternate- and same-form conditions directly, and differ widely in terms of test-retest interval, modality of stimuli (verbal, spatial), format of the memory test, and number of examinations. The present study investigated practice effects during repeated administrations of verbal and nonverbal memory tests which have the same administration format. Two groups of healthy participants, matched for age, education, estimated IQ, and baseline memory test performance, were assigned to either a same- or alternate-forms condition. Participants taking the same form every two weeks improved significantly over four sessions. Participants completing alternate forms of the nonverbal memory test produced a small practice gain, but the verbal memory test was resistant to practice effects when alternate forms were used.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031767812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031767812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9845161

AN - SCOPUS:0031767812

VL - 20

SP - 339

EP - 352

JO - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

JF - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

SN - 0168-8634

IS - 3

ER -