Preconceptional sex selection: Past, present, and future

Amjad Hossain, S. Barik, B. Rizk, I. H. Thorneycroft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Predetermination of sex in human and in farm animals is reviewed. Preconceptional sex selection has generated great interest and controversy over the years. Medical and commercial benefits outweigh the ethical issues. Technology has not yet provided a routine method for separating the X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm. Flow cytometry is the only technique that produces a clinically significant enrichment of X- or Y-bearing spermatozoa. However, concern has been raised about the methodological implications of the flow technique because of the use of DNA stains and UV light. Some other techniques, such as gradient columns, appear to produce a slight enrichment of one type of sperm over the other, but this level of enrichment appears unlikely to affect the sex ratio at birth. It thus remains speculative whether 100% pure preparation of X or Y sperm can be obtained unless a major improvement in methodology is achieved. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FTSH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are currently the methods of choice for evaluating the validity of the sex selection procedure. In view of the extraordinary pace of the technological and scientific progress, it can be expected that the clinical and commercial application of the technology of preconceptional sex selection by X and Y sperm separation will be a reality in near future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-14
Number of pages12
JournalSystems Biology in Reproductive Medicine
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sex Preselection
Spermatozoa
Technology
Sex Ratio
Domestic Animals
Ultraviolet Rays
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Ethics
Flow Cytometry
Coloring Agents
Parturition
Polymerase Chain Reaction
DNA

Keywords

  • review
  • separation techniques
  • X and Y sperm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Urology

Cite this

Preconceptional sex selection : Past, present, and future. / Hossain, Amjad; Barik, S.; Rizk, B.; Thorneycroft, I. H.

In: Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 1, 1998, p. 3-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hossain, Amjad ; Barik, S. ; Rizk, B. ; Thorneycroft, I. H. / Preconceptional sex selection : Past, present, and future. In: Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine. 1998 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 3-14.
@article{1445ebab338a4bba8a74751f3b0df6c1,
title = "Preconceptional sex selection: Past, present, and future",
abstract = "Predetermination of sex in human and in farm animals is reviewed. Preconceptional sex selection has generated great interest and controversy over the years. Medical and commercial benefits outweigh the ethical issues. Technology has not yet provided a routine method for separating the X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm. Flow cytometry is the only technique that produces a clinically significant enrichment of X- or Y-bearing spermatozoa. However, concern has been raised about the methodological implications of the flow technique because of the use of DNA stains and UV light. Some other techniques, such as gradient columns, appear to produce a slight enrichment of one type of sperm over the other, but this level of enrichment appears unlikely to affect the sex ratio at birth. It thus remains speculative whether 100{\%} pure preparation of X or Y sperm can be obtained unless a major improvement in methodology is achieved. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FTSH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are currently the methods of choice for evaluating the validity of the sex selection procedure. In view of the extraordinary pace of the technological and scientific progress, it can be expected that the clinical and commercial application of the technology of preconceptional sex selection by X and Y sperm separation will be a reality in near future.",
keywords = "review, separation techniques, X and Y sperm",
author = "Amjad Hossain and S. Barik and B. Rizk and Thorneycroft, {I. H.}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.3109/01485019808987923",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "3--14",
journal = "Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine",
issn = "1939-6368",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preconceptional sex selection

T2 - Past, present, and future

AU - Hossain, Amjad

AU - Barik, S.

AU - Rizk, B.

AU - Thorneycroft, I. H.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Predetermination of sex in human and in farm animals is reviewed. Preconceptional sex selection has generated great interest and controversy over the years. Medical and commercial benefits outweigh the ethical issues. Technology has not yet provided a routine method for separating the X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm. Flow cytometry is the only technique that produces a clinically significant enrichment of X- or Y-bearing spermatozoa. However, concern has been raised about the methodological implications of the flow technique because of the use of DNA stains and UV light. Some other techniques, such as gradient columns, appear to produce a slight enrichment of one type of sperm over the other, but this level of enrichment appears unlikely to affect the sex ratio at birth. It thus remains speculative whether 100% pure preparation of X or Y sperm can be obtained unless a major improvement in methodology is achieved. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FTSH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are currently the methods of choice for evaluating the validity of the sex selection procedure. In view of the extraordinary pace of the technological and scientific progress, it can be expected that the clinical and commercial application of the technology of preconceptional sex selection by X and Y sperm separation will be a reality in near future.

AB - Predetermination of sex in human and in farm animals is reviewed. Preconceptional sex selection has generated great interest and controversy over the years. Medical and commercial benefits outweigh the ethical issues. Technology has not yet provided a routine method for separating the X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm. Flow cytometry is the only technique that produces a clinically significant enrichment of X- or Y-bearing spermatozoa. However, concern has been raised about the methodological implications of the flow technique because of the use of DNA stains and UV light. Some other techniques, such as gradient columns, appear to produce a slight enrichment of one type of sperm over the other, but this level of enrichment appears unlikely to affect the sex ratio at birth. It thus remains speculative whether 100% pure preparation of X or Y sperm can be obtained unless a major improvement in methodology is achieved. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FTSH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are currently the methods of choice for evaluating the validity of the sex selection procedure. In view of the extraordinary pace of the technological and scientific progress, it can be expected that the clinical and commercial application of the technology of preconceptional sex selection by X and Y sperm separation will be a reality in near future.

KW - review

KW - separation techniques

KW - X and Y sperm

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961180485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961180485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/01485019808987923

DO - 10.3109/01485019808987923

M3 - Article

C2 - 9465998

AN - SCOPUS:79961180485

VL - 40

SP - 3

EP - 14

JO - Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine

JF - Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine

SN - 1939-6368

IS - 1

ER -