Predictors of enrollment in individual- and couple-based lifestyle intervention trials for cancer survivors

Emily Cox-Martin, Jaejoon Song, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, Elizabeth Lyons, Karen Basen-Engquist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To utilize data from lifestyle intervention pilot studies for cancer survivors to elucidate demographic, disease-related, and health behavior factors that might predict enrollment in this type of research. Additionally, factors were differentially compared based on intervention design (i.e., individual versus couple-based). Methods: Secondary data analysis was conducted regarding predictors of enrollment into lifestyle intervention studies, including Healthy Moves Weight Loss (individual participants, screened n = 89, enrolled n = 30) and Healthy Moves Couples (survivors and their partners, screened n = 197, enrolled n = 23). Due to small sample sizes, common in pilot studies, random forest analyses were used to maximize information yielded by the data. Results: Results identified numerous important predictors of enrollment in individual and couple-based lifestyle interventions. Percent energy from fat and physical activity minutes were identified as important predictors for both recruitment methods. Age, cancer site, and marital status were important predictors of enrollment in the individual-based intervention. Weight, fiber consumption, and disease-related symptom severity and interference were important predictors of enrollment in the couple-based intervention. Conclusion: Although there was some overlap in predictors for enrollment between studies, many differential predictors were identified between individual versus couple-based study designs for lifestyle intervention in cancer survivors. Future lifestyle intervention studies for cancer survivors may benefit from targeting different predictors of enrollment based on study design to optimize recruitment. Additionally, understanding predictors may allow certain barriers to enrollment (i.e., symptom burden) to be directly addressed, making lifestyle intervention research more feasible and acceptable to difficult-to-recruit survivors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 8 2018

Fingerprint

Survivors
Life Style
Neoplasms
Health Behavior
Marital Status
Research
Sample Size
Weight Loss
Fats
Demography
Exercise
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Cancer survivors
  • Enrollment
  • Lifestyle intervention
  • Random forest

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Cite this

Predictors of enrollment in individual- and couple-based lifestyle intervention trials for cancer survivors. / Cox-Martin, Emily; Song, Jaejoon; Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy; Lyons, Elizabeth; Basen-Engquist, Karen.

In: Supportive Care in Cancer, 08.02.2018, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cox-Martin, Emily ; Song, Jaejoon ; Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy ; Lyons, Elizabeth ; Basen-Engquist, Karen. / Predictors of enrollment in individual- and couple-based lifestyle intervention trials for cancer survivors. In: Supportive Care in Cancer. 2018 ; pp. 1-9.
@article{9a7874670fbf48bc91f6ddf2754cf844,
title = "Predictors of enrollment in individual- and couple-based lifestyle intervention trials for cancer survivors",
abstract = "Purpose: To utilize data from lifestyle intervention pilot studies for cancer survivors to elucidate demographic, disease-related, and health behavior factors that might predict enrollment in this type of research. Additionally, factors were differentially compared based on intervention design (i.e., individual versus couple-based). Methods: Secondary data analysis was conducted regarding predictors of enrollment into lifestyle intervention studies, including Healthy Moves Weight Loss (individual participants, screened n = 89, enrolled n = 30) and Healthy Moves Couples (survivors and their partners, screened n = 197, enrolled n = 23). Due to small sample sizes, common in pilot studies, random forest analyses were used to maximize information yielded by the data. Results: Results identified numerous important predictors of enrollment in individual and couple-based lifestyle interventions. Percent energy from fat and physical activity minutes were identified as important predictors for both recruitment methods. Age, cancer site, and marital status were important predictors of enrollment in the individual-based intervention. Weight, fiber consumption, and disease-related symptom severity and interference were important predictors of enrollment in the couple-based intervention. Conclusion: Although there was some overlap in predictors for enrollment between studies, many differential predictors were identified between individual versus couple-based study designs for lifestyle intervention in cancer survivors. Future lifestyle intervention studies for cancer survivors may benefit from targeting different predictors of enrollment based on study design to optimize recruitment. Additionally, understanding predictors may allow certain barriers to enrollment (i.e., symptom burden) to be directly addressed, making lifestyle intervention research more feasible and acceptable to difficult-to-recruit survivors.",
keywords = "Cancer survivors, Enrollment, Lifestyle intervention, Random forest",
author = "Emily Cox-Martin and Jaejoon Song and Wendy Demark-Wahnefried and Elizabeth Lyons and Karen Basen-Engquist",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s00520-018-4084-6",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Supportive Care in Cancer",
issn = "0941-4355",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of enrollment in individual- and couple-based lifestyle intervention trials for cancer survivors

AU - Cox-Martin, Emily

AU - Song, Jaejoon

AU - Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy

AU - Lyons, Elizabeth

AU - Basen-Engquist, Karen

PY - 2018/2/8

Y1 - 2018/2/8

N2 - Purpose: To utilize data from lifestyle intervention pilot studies for cancer survivors to elucidate demographic, disease-related, and health behavior factors that might predict enrollment in this type of research. Additionally, factors were differentially compared based on intervention design (i.e., individual versus couple-based). Methods: Secondary data analysis was conducted regarding predictors of enrollment into lifestyle intervention studies, including Healthy Moves Weight Loss (individual participants, screened n = 89, enrolled n = 30) and Healthy Moves Couples (survivors and their partners, screened n = 197, enrolled n = 23). Due to small sample sizes, common in pilot studies, random forest analyses were used to maximize information yielded by the data. Results: Results identified numerous important predictors of enrollment in individual and couple-based lifestyle interventions. Percent energy from fat and physical activity minutes were identified as important predictors for both recruitment methods. Age, cancer site, and marital status were important predictors of enrollment in the individual-based intervention. Weight, fiber consumption, and disease-related symptom severity and interference were important predictors of enrollment in the couple-based intervention. Conclusion: Although there was some overlap in predictors for enrollment between studies, many differential predictors were identified between individual versus couple-based study designs for lifestyle intervention in cancer survivors. Future lifestyle intervention studies for cancer survivors may benefit from targeting different predictors of enrollment based on study design to optimize recruitment. Additionally, understanding predictors may allow certain barriers to enrollment (i.e., symptom burden) to be directly addressed, making lifestyle intervention research more feasible and acceptable to difficult-to-recruit survivors.

AB - Purpose: To utilize data from lifestyle intervention pilot studies for cancer survivors to elucidate demographic, disease-related, and health behavior factors that might predict enrollment in this type of research. Additionally, factors were differentially compared based on intervention design (i.e., individual versus couple-based). Methods: Secondary data analysis was conducted regarding predictors of enrollment into lifestyle intervention studies, including Healthy Moves Weight Loss (individual participants, screened n = 89, enrolled n = 30) and Healthy Moves Couples (survivors and their partners, screened n = 197, enrolled n = 23). Due to small sample sizes, common in pilot studies, random forest analyses were used to maximize information yielded by the data. Results: Results identified numerous important predictors of enrollment in individual and couple-based lifestyle interventions. Percent energy from fat and physical activity minutes were identified as important predictors for both recruitment methods. Age, cancer site, and marital status were important predictors of enrollment in the individual-based intervention. Weight, fiber consumption, and disease-related symptom severity and interference were important predictors of enrollment in the couple-based intervention. Conclusion: Although there was some overlap in predictors for enrollment between studies, many differential predictors were identified between individual versus couple-based study designs for lifestyle intervention in cancer survivors. Future lifestyle intervention studies for cancer survivors may benefit from targeting different predictors of enrollment based on study design to optimize recruitment. Additionally, understanding predictors may allow certain barriers to enrollment (i.e., symptom burden) to be directly addressed, making lifestyle intervention research more feasible and acceptable to difficult-to-recruit survivors.

KW - Cancer survivors

KW - Enrollment

KW - Lifestyle intervention

KW - Random forest

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041551695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041551695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00520-018-4084-6

DO - 10.1007/s00520-018-4084-6

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Supportive Care in Cancer

JF - Supportive Care in Cancer

SN - 0941-4355

ER -