Preferences of husbands and wives for outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment

Robert J. Volk, Scott B. Cantor, Alvah R. Cass, Stephen J. Spann, Susan Weller, Murray D. Krahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the preferences of male primary care patients and their spouses for the outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment, and quality of life with metastatic prostate cancer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: Primary care clinics in Galveston County, Texas. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-eight couples in which the husband was a primary care patient and a candidate for prostate cancer screening. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preferences were measured as utilities for treatment outcomes and quality of life with metastatic disease by the time trade-off method for the husband and the wife individually and then conjointly for the couple. For each health state considered, husbands associated lower utilities for the health states than did their wives. Couples' utilities fell between those of husbands and wives (all comparisons were significant at P < .01). For partial and complete impotence and mild-to-moderate incontinence, the median utility value for the wives was 1.0, indicating that most wives did not associate disutility with their husbands having to experience these treatment complications. CONCLUSIONS: Male primary care patients who are candidates for prostate cancer screening evaluate the outcomes of prostate cancer treatment and life with advanced prostate cancer as being far worse than do their wives. Because the choice between quantity and quality of life is a highly individualistic one, both the patient and his partner should be involved in making decisions about prostate cancer screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)339-348
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2004

Fingerprint

Spouses
Early Detection of Cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms
Primary Health Care
Therapeutics
Quality of Life
Health
Erectile Dysfunction
Marriage
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Medical decision making
  • Patient preferences
  • Primary health care
  • Prostate cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Preferences of husbands and wives for outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment. / Volk, Robert J.; Cantor, Scott B.; Cass, Alvah R.; Spann, Stephen J.; Weller, Susan; Krahn, Murray D.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 4, 04.2004, p. 339-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Volk, Robert J. ; Cantor, Scott B. ; Cass, Alvah R. ; Spann, Stephen J. ; Weller, Susan ; Krahn, Murray D. / Preferences of husbands and wives for outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 339-348.
@article{b38f22367caf4b04b5b54f0ec28b4e4d,
title = "Preferences of husbands and wives for outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To explore the preferences of male primary care patients and their spouses for the outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment, and quality of life with metastatic prostate cancer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: Primary care clinics in Galveston County, Texas. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-eight couples in which the husband was a primary care patient and a candidate for prostate cancer screening. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preferences were measured as utilities for treatment outcomes and quality of life with metastatic disease by the time trade-off method for the husband and the wife individually and then conjointly for the couple. For each health state considered, husbands associated lower utilities for the health states than did their wives. Couples' utilities fell between those of husbands and wives (all comparisons were significant at P < .01). For partial and complete impotence and mild-to-moderate incontinence, the median utility value for the wives was 1.0, indicating that most wives did not associate disutility with their husbands having to experience these treatment complications. CONCLUSIONS: Male primary care patients who are candidates for prostate cancer screening evaluate the outcomes of prostate cancer treatment and life with advanced prostate cancer as being far worse than do their wives. Because the choice between quantity and quality of life is a highly individualistic one, both the patient and his partner should be involved in making decisions about prostate cancer screening.",
keywords = "Medical decision making, Patient preferences, Primary health care, Prostate cancer",
author = "Volk, {Robert J.} and Cantor, {Scott B.} and Cass, {Alvah R.} and Spann, {Stephen J.} and Susan Weller and Krahn, {Murray D.}",
year = "2004",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30046.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "339--348",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preferences of husbands and wives for outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment

AU - Volk, Robert J.

AU - Cantor, Scott B.

AU - Cass, Alvah R.

AU - Spann, Stephen J.

AU - Weller, Susan

AU - Krahn, Murray D.

PY - 2004/4

Y1 - 2004/4

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To explore the preferences of male primary care patients and their spouses for the outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment, and quality of life with metastatic prostate cancer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: Primary care clinics in Galveston County, Texas. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-eight couples in which the husband was a primary care patient and a candidate for prostate cancer screening. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preferences were measured as utilities for treatment outcomes and quality of life with metastatic disease by the time trade-off method for the husband and the wife individually and then conjointly for the couple. For each health state considered, husbands associated lower utilities for the health states than did their wives. Couples' utilities fell between those of husbands and wives (all comparisons were significant at P < .01). For partial and complete impotence and mild-to-moderate incontinence, the median utility value for the wives was 1.0, indicating that most wives did not associate disutility with their husbands having to experience these treatment complications. CONCLUSIONS: Male primary care patients who are candidates for prostate cancer screening evaluate the outcomes of prostate cancer treatment and life with advanced prostate cancer as being far worse than do their wives. Because the choice between quantity and quality of life is a highly individualistic one, both the patient and his partner should be involved in making decisions about prostate cancer screening.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To explore the preferences of male primary care patients and their spouses for the outcomes of prostate cancer screening and treatment, and quality of life with metastatic prostate cancer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: Primary care clinics in Galveston County, Texas. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-eight couples in which the husband was a primary care patient and a candidate for prostate cancer screening. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Preferences were measured as utilities for treatment outcomes and quality of life with metastatic disease by the time trade-off method for the husband and the wife individually and then conjointly for the couple. For each health state considered, husbands associated lower utilities for the health states than did their wives. Couples' utilities fell between those of husbands and wives (all comparisons were significant at P < .01). For partial and complete impotence and mild-to-moderate incontinence, the median utility value for the wives was 1.0, indicating that most wives did not associate disutility with their husbands having to experience these treatment complications. CONCLUSIONS: Male primary care patients who are candidates for prostate cancer screening evaluate the outcomes of prostate cancer treatment and life with advanced prostate cancer as being far worse than do their wives. Because the choice between quantity and quality of life is a highly individualistic one, both the patient and his partner should be involved in making decisions about prostate cancer screening.

KW - Medical decision making

KW - Patient preferences

KW - Primary health care

KW - Prostate cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1942467444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1942467444&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30046.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30046.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 15061743

AN - SCOPUS:1942467444

VL - 19

SP - 339

EP - 348

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 4

ER -