Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth

A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sheri Madigan, Anh Ly, Christina L. Rash, Joris Van Ouytsel, Jeffrey Temple

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The existing literature on sexting among youth shows that sexting is a predictor of sexual behavior and may be associated with other health outcomes and risky behaviors. However, there remains a lack of consensus on the prevalence of sexting, which is needed to inform future research, intervention, and policy development. OBJECTIVE: To provide a meta-analytic synthesis of studies examining the prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior, analyzed by age, sex, geography, and method of sexting. DATA SOURCES: In an academic setting, electronic searches in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science were conducted for the period January 1990 to June 2016, yielding 1147 nonduplicate records. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if participants were younger than 18 years and the prevalence of sexting explicit images, videos, or messages was reported. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Literature review and data extraction followed established PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers extracted all relevant data. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to derive the mean prevalence rates. Thirty-nine studies met final inclusion criteria. MAIN OUTCOMESAND MEASURES: Meta-analyses of the prevalence of sending, receiving, and forwarding without consent, as well as having one's sext forwarded without consent. RESULTS: Among39 included studies, there were 110 380 participants; the mean age was 15.16 years (age range, 11.9-17.0 years), and on average 47.2% were male. Studies were available for sending (n = 34), receiving (n = 20), forwarding without consent (n = 5), and having a sext forwarded without consent (n = 4). The mean prevalences for sending and receiving sexts were 14.8% (95% CI, 12.8%-16.8%) and 27.4% (95% CI, 23.1%-31.7%), respectively. Moderator analyses revealed that effect sizes varied as a function of child age (prevalence increased with age), year of data collection (prevalence increased over time), and sextingmethod (higher prevalence on mobile devices compared with computers). The prevalence offorwarding a sext without consent was 12.0% (95% CI, 8.4%-15.6%), and the prevalence ofhaving asext forwarded without consent was 8.4% (95% CI, 4.7%-12.0%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The prevalence of sexting has increased in recent years and increases as youth age. Further research focusing on nonconsensual sexting is necessary to appropriately target and inform intervention, education, and policy efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-335
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA Pediatrics
Volume172
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Geography
Policy Making
Research
MEDLINE
Sexual Behavior
Consensus
Cross-Sectional Studies
Guidelines
Education
Equipment and Supplies
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Madigan, Sheri; Ly, Anh; Rash, Christina L.; Van Ouytsel, Joris; Temple, Jeffrey.

In: JAMA Pediatrics, Vol. 172, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 327-335.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Madigan, Sheri ; Ly, Anh ; Rash, Christina L. ; Van Ouytsel, Joris ; Temple, Jeffrey. / Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: JAMA Pediatrics. 2018 ; Vol. 172, No. 4. pp. 327-335.
@article{f82d434613e44106a389d61ceafd1d98,
title = "Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE: The existing literature on sexting among youth shows that sexting is a predictor of sexual behavior and may be associated with other health outcomes and risky behaviors. However, there remains a lack of consensus on the prevalence of sexting, which is needed to inform future research, intervention, and policy development. OBJECTIVE: To provide a meta-analytic synthesis of studies examining the prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior, analyzed by age, sex, geography, and method of sexting. DATA SOURCES: In an academic setting, electronic searches in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science were conducted for the period January 1990 to June 2016, yielding 1147 nonduplicate records. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if participants were younger than 18 years and the prevalence of sexting explicit images, videos, or messages was reported. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Literature review and data extraction followed established PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers extracted all relevant data. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to derive the mean prevalence rates. Thirty-nine studies met final inclusion criteria. MAIN OUTCOMESAND MEASURES: Meta-analyses of the prevalence of sending, receiving, and forwarding without consent, as well as having one's sext forwarded without consent. RESULTS: Among39 included studies, there were 110 380 participants; the mean age was 15.16 years (age range, 11.9-17.0 years), and on average 47.2{\%} were male. Studies were available for sending (n = 34), receiving (n = 20), forwarding without consent (n = 5), and having a sext forwarded without consent (n = 4). The mean prevalences for sending and receiving sexts were 14.8{\%} (95{\%} CI, 12.8{\%}-16.8{\%}) and 27.4{\%} (95{\%} CI, 23.1{\%}-31.7{\%}), respectively. Moderator analyses revealed that effect sizes varied as a function of child age (prevalence increased with age), year of data collection (prevalence increased over time), and sextingmethod (higher prevalence on mobile devices compared with computers). The prevalence offorwarding a sext without consent was 12.0{\%} (95{\%} CI, 8.4{\%}-15.6{\%}), and the prevalence ofhaving asext forwarded without consent was 8.4{\%} (95{\%} CI, 4.7{\%}-12.0{\%}). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The prevalence of sexting has increased in recent years and increases as youth age. Further research focusing on nonconsensual sexting is necessary to appropriately target and inform intervention, education, and policy efforts.",
author = "Sheri Madigan and Anh Ly and Rash, {Christina L.} and {Van Ouytsel}, Joris and Jeffrey Temple",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "172",
pages = "327--335",
journal = "JAMA Pediatrics",
issn = "2168-6203",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Madigan, Sheri

AU - Ly, Anh

AU - Rash, Christina L.

AU - Van Ouytsel, Joris

AU - Temple, Jeffrey

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - IMPORTANCE: The existing literature on sexting among youth shows that sexting is a predictor of sexual behavior and may be associated with other health outcomes and risky behaviors. However, there remains a lack of consensus on the prevalence of sexting, which is needed to inform future research, intervention, and policy development. OBJECTIVE: To provide a meta-analytic synthesis of studies examining the prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior, analyzed by age, sex, geography, and method of sexting. DATA SOURCES: In an academic setting, electronic searches in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science were conducted for the period January 1990 to June 2016, yielding 1147 nonduplicate records. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if participants were younger than 18 years and the prevalence of sexting explicit images, videos, or messages was reported. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Literature review and data extraction followed established PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers extracted all relevant data. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to derive the mean prevalence rates. Thirty-nine studies met final inclusion criteria. MAIN OUTCOMESAND MEASURES: Meta-analyses of the prevalence of sending, receiving, and forwarding without consent, as well as having one's sext forwarded without consent. RESULTS: Among39 included studies, there were 110 380 participants; the mean age was 15.16 years (age range, 11.9-17.0 years), and on average 47.2% were male. Studies were available for sending (n = 34), receiving (n = 20), forwarding without consent (n = 5), and having a sext forwarded without consent (n = 4). The mean prevalences for sending and receiving sexts were 14.8% (95% CI, 12.8%-16.8%) and 27.4% (95% CI, 23.1%-31.7%), respectively. Moderator analyses revealed that effect sizes varied as a function of child age (prevalence increased with age), year of data collection (prevalence increased over time), and sextingmethod (higher prevalence on mobile devices compared with computers). The prevalence offorwarding a sext without consent was 12.0% (95% CI, 8.4%-15.6%), and the prevalence ofhaving asext forwarded without consent was 8.4% (95% CI, 4.7%-12.0%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The prevalence of sexting has increased in recent years and increases as youth age. Further research focusing on nonconsensual sexting is necessary to appropriately target and inform intervention, education, and policy efforts.

AB - IMPORTANCE: The existing literature on sexting among youth shows that sexting is a predictor of sexual behavior and may be associated with other health outcomes and risky behaviors. However, there remains a lack of consensus on the prevalence of sexting, which is needed to inform future research, intervention, and policy development. OBJECTIVE: To provide a meta-analytic synthesis of studies examining the prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior, analyzed by age, sex, geography, and method of sexting. DATA SOURCES: In an academic setting, electronic searches in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science were conducted for the period January 1990 to June 2016, yielding 1147 nonduplicate records. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if participants were younger than 18 years and the prevalence of sexting explicit images, videos, or messages was reported. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Literature review and data extraction followed established PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers extracted all relevant data. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to derive the mean prevalence rates. Thirty-nine studies met final inclusion criteria. MAIN OUTCOMESAND MEASURES: Meta-analyses of the prevalence of sending, receiving, and forwarding without consent, as well as having one's sext forwarded without consent. RESULTS: Among39 included studies, there were 110 380 participants; the mean age was 15.16 years (age range, 11.9-17.0 years), and on average 47.2% were male. Studies were available for sending (n = 34), receiving (n = 20), forwarding without consent (n = 5), and having a sext forwarded without consent (n = 4). The mean prevalences for sending and receiving sexts were 14.8% (95% CI, 12.8%-16.8%) and 27.4% (95% CI, 23.1%-31.7%), respectively. Moderator analyses revealed that effect sizes varied as a function of child age (prevalence increased with age), year of data collection (prevalence increased over time), and sextingmethod (higher prevalence on mobile devices compared with computers). The prevalence offorwarding a sext without consent was 12.0% (95% CI, 8.4%-15.6%), and the prevalence ofhaving asext forwarded without consent was 8.4% (95% CI, 4.7%-12.0%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The prevalence of sexting has increased in recent years and increases as youth age. Further research focusing on nonconsensual sexting is necessary to appropriately target and inform intervention, education, and policy efforts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044931501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044931501&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314

DO - 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314

M3 - Review article

VL - 172

SP - 327

EP - 335

JO - JAMA Pediatrics

JF - JAMA Pediatrics

SN - 2168-6203

IS - 4

ER -