TY - JOUR
T1 - Preventing Iatrogenic Fibula Fractures Using the Push-Pull Technique
T2 - A Biomechanical Comparison of Unicortical Versus Bicortical Post Screws
AU - McCown, Sheldon A.
AU - Weatherby, Paul J.
AU - Morris, Randal P.
AU - Panchbhavi, Vinod K.
AU - Hagedorn, John C.
AU - Weiss, William M.
AU - Chen, Jie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © SLACK Incorporated.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Background: Displaced diaphyseal fractures can be reduced using the push-pull technique, wherein a plate is affixed to the distal fragment of the fracture, a post screw is placed proximal to the plate, and a lamina spreader creates distraction. This study evaluated the load to failure and mechanism of failure of bicortical and unicortical post screws during reduction. Materials and Methods: Four matched pairs of cadaver legs were subjected to a 2-cm oblique osteotomy simulating a displaced, oblique diaphyseal fracture. A 6-hole compression plate was affixed to the distal fragment with 2 unicortical locking screws, and a 12-mm unicortical or 20-mm bicortical screw was inserted as a post screw proximal to the plate. A lamina bone spreader was used to exert a distraction force between the plate and the post screw. A mechanical actuator simulated the distraction procedure until failure. Maximum applied load, displacement, and absorbed energy were recorded and compared across unicortical and bicortical groups by paired t tests. Results: At maximum load, we found statistically significant differences in displacement (P=.003) and energy absorbed (P=.022) between the two groups. All unicortical screws failed through screw toggle and bone cut-out. Bicortical screws failed through bending, with no visible damage to the bone at the screw site. Conclusion: When diaphyseal fractures are significantly shortened and require a greater distraction force to achieve reduction, bicortical screws demonstrate a higher mechanical load to failure and increased bone loss from the screw-removal site. A unicortical post screw may be used if minimal distraction is needed.
AB - Background: Displaced diaphyseal fractures can be reduced using the push-pull technique, wherein a plate is affixed to the distal fragment of the fracture, a post screw is placed proximal to the plate, and a lamina spreader creates distraction. This study evaluated the load to failure and mechanism of failure of bicortical and unicortical post screws during reduction. Materials and Methods: Four matched pairs of cadaver legs were subjected to a 2-cm oblique osteotomy simulating a displaced, oblique diaphyseal fracture. A 6-hole compression plate was affixed to the distal fragment with 2 unicortical locking screws, and a 12-mm unicortical or 20-mm bicortical screw was inserted as a post screw proximal to the plate. A lamina bone spreader was used to exert a distraction force between the plate and the post screw. A mechanical actuator simulated the distraction procedure until failure. Maximum applied load, displacement, and absorbed energy were recorded and compared across unicortical and bicortical groups by paired t tests. Results: At maximum load, we found statistically significant differences in displacement (P=.003) and energy absorbed (P=.022) between the two groups. All unicortical screws failed through screw toggle and bone cut-out. Bicortical screws failed through bending, with no visible damage to the bone at the screw site. Conclusion: When diaphyseal fractures are significantly shortened and require a greater distraction force to achieve reduction, bicortical screws demonstrate a higher mechanical load to failure and increased bone loss from the screw-removal site. A unicortical post screw may be used if minimal distraction is needed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204416457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85204416457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3928/01477447-20240702-02
DO - 10.3928/01477447-20240702-02
M3 - Article
C2 - 38976846
AN - SCOPUS:85204416457
SN - 0147-7447
VL - 47
SP - 308
EP - 312
JO - Orthopedics
JF - Orthopedics
IS - 5
ER -