Prioritization of inpatient hospital services to prisoners: A method for justifying care and costs

Bryan C. Schneider, Amy Jo Harzke, Lana Ivanitskaya, Owen J. Murray

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Scopus citations


    As a response to rising health care costs and substantial cuts in state funding for correctional health care in Texas, we developed and applied a process framework for systematically prioritizing the provision of inpatient hospital services to prisoners. Specifically, all inpatient services provided from September 2009 through August 2011 at the University of Texas Medical Branch/ Texas Department of Criminal Justice Hospital were sorted according to levels of care consistent with those previously defined by the Oregon Department of Corrections and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Nearly all inpatient services (94%) were deemed medically mandatory (Level 1) or medically necessary (Level 2). These services must be funded to ensure an adequate level of care, and capitated- funding mechanisms may not be sufficiently flexible to cover their costs. Correctional health care systems may adapt the framework used here to inform state policymakers regarding provision of inpatient services and funding requirements.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)863-876
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
    Issue number2
    StatePublished - May 2014


    • Correctional health care
    • Health priorities
    • Health services
    • Hospitals
    • Prisons

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health


    Dive into the research topics of 'Prioritization of inpatient hospital services to prisoners: A method for justifying care and costs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this