Prioritization of inpatient hospital services to prisoners

A method for justifying care and costs

Bryan C. Schneider, Amy Jo Harzke, Lana Ivanitskaya, Owen J. Murray

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    As a response to rising health care costs and substantial cuts in state funding for correctional health care in Texas, we developed and applied a process framework for systematically prioritizing the provision of inpatient hospital services to prisoners. Specifically, all inpatient services provided from September 2009 through August 2011 at the University of Texas Medical Branch/ Texas Department of Criminal Justice Hospital were sorted according to levels of care consistent with those previously defined by the Oregon Department of Corrections and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Nearly all inpatient services (94%) were deemed medically mandatory (Level 1) or medically necessary (Level 2). These services must be funded to ensure an adequate level of care, and capitated- funding mechanisms may not be sufficiently flexible to cover their costs. Correctional health care systems may adapt the framework used here to inform state policymakers regarding provision of inpatient services and funding requirements.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)863-876
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
    Volume25
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Prisoners
    Inpatients
    Costs and Cost Analysis
    Delivery of Health Care
    Criminal Law
    Prisons
    Health Care Costs

    Keywords

    • Correctional health care
    • Health priorities
    • Health services
    • Hospitals
    • Prisons

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Cite this

    Prioritization of inpatient hospital services to prisoners : A method for justifying care and costs. / Schneider, Bryan C.; Harzke, Amy Jo; Ivanitskaya, Lana; Murray, Owen J.

    In: Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2014, p. 863-876.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Schneider, Bryan C. ; Harzke, Amy Jo ; Ivanitskaya, Lana ; Murray, Owen J. / Prioritization of inpatient hospital services to prisoners : A method for justifying care and costs. In: Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 2014 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 863-876.
    @article{cdc3585577184fe982db68e48ebac7fc,
    title = "Prioritization of inpatient hospital services to prisoners: A method for justifying care and costs",
    abstract = "As a response to rising health care costs and substantial cuts in state funding for correctional health care in Texas, we developed and applied a process framework for systematically prioritizing the provision of inpatient hospital services to prisoners. Specifically, all inpatient services provided from September 2009 through August 2011 at the University of Texas Medical Branch/ Texas Department of Criminal Justice Hospital were sorted according to levels of care consistent with those previously defined by the Oregon Department of Corrections and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Nearly all inpatient services (94{\%}) were deemed medically mandatory (Level 1) or medically necessary (Level 2). These services must be funded to ensure an adequate level of care, and capitated- funding mechanisms may not be sufficiently flexible to cover their costs. Correctional health care systems may adapt the framework used here to inform state policymakers regarding provision of inpatient services and funding requirements.",
    keywords = "Correctional health care, Health priorities, Health services, Hospitals, Prisons",
    author = "Schneider, {Bryan C.} and Harzke, {Amy Jo} and Lana Ivanitskaya and Murray, {Owen J.}",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1353/hpu.2014.0077",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "25",
    pages = "863--876",
    journal = "Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved",
    issn = "1049-2089",
    publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Prioritization of inpatient hospital services to prisoners

    T2 - A method for justifying care and costs

    AU - Schneider, Bryan C.

    AU - Harzke, Amy Jo

    AU - Ivanitskaya, Lana

    AU - Murray, Owen J.

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - As a response to rising health care costs and substantial cuts in state funding for correctional health care in Texas, we developed and applied a process framework for systematically prioritizing the provision of inpatient hospital services to prisoners. Specifically, all inpatient services provided from September 2009 through August 2011 at the University of Texas Medical Branch/ Texas Department of Criminal Justice Hospital were sorted according to levels of care consistent with those previously defined by the Oregon Department of Corrections and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Nearly all inpatient services (94%) were deemed medically mandatory (Level 1) or medically necessary (Level 2). These services must be funded to ensure an adequate level of care, and capitated- funding mechanisms may not be sufficiently flexible to cover their costs. Correctional health care systems may adapt the framework used here to inform state policymakers regarding provision of inpatient services and funding requirements.

    AB - As a response to rising health care costs and substantial cuts in state funding for correctional health care in Texas, we developed and applied a process framework for systematically prioritizing the provision of inpatient hospital services to prisoners. Specifically, all inpatient services provided from September 2009 through August 2011 at the University of Texas Medical Branch/ Texas Department of Criminal Justice Hospital were sorted according to levels of care consistent with those previously defined by the Oregon Department of Corrections and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Nearly all inpatient services (94%) were deemed medically mandatory (Level 1) or medically necessary (Level 2). These services must be funded to ensure an adequate level of care, and capitated- funding mechanisms may not be sufficiently flexible to cover their costs. Correctional health care systems may adapt the framework used here to inform state policymakers regarding provision of inpatient services and funding requirements.

    KW - Correctional health care

    KW - Health priorities

    KW - Health services

    KW - Hospitals

    KW - Prisons

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901275116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901275116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1353/hpu.2014.0077

    DO - 10.1353/hpu.2014.0077

    M3 - Article

    VL - 25

    SP - 863

    EP - 876

    JO - Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

    JF - Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

    SN - 1049-2089

    IS - 2

    ER -