Prognostic scoring systems in burns

A review

N. N. Sheppard, S. Hemington-Gorse, O. P. Shelley, B. Philp, Peter Dziewulski

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Survival after burn has steadily improved over the last few decades. Patient mortality is, however, still the primary outcome measure for burn care. Scoring systems aim to use the most predictive premorbid and injury factors to yield an expected likelihood of death for a given patient. Age, burn surface area and inhalational injury remain the mainstays of burn prognostication, but their relative weighting varies between scoring systems. Biochemical markers may hold the key to predicting outcomes in burns. Alternatively, the incorporation of global scales such as those used in the general intensive care unit may have relevance in burn patients. Outcomes other than mortality are increasingly relevant, especially as mortality after burns continues to improve. The evolution of prognostic scoring in burns is reviewed with specific reference to the more widely regarded measures. Alternative approaches to burn prognostication are reviewed along with evidence for the use of outcomes other than mortality. The purpose and utility of prognostic scoring in general is discussed with relevance to its potential uses in audit, research and at the bedside.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1288-1295
Number of pages8
JournalBurns
Volume37
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Burns
Mortality
Wounds and Injuries
Intensive Care Units
Biomarkers
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Survival
Research

Keywords

  • Burns
  • Mortality
  • Prognosis
  • Scoring system

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Sheppard, N. N., Hemington-Gorse, S., Shelley, O. P., Philp, B., & Dziewulski, P. (2011). Prognostic scoring systems in burns: A review. Burns, 37(8), 1288-1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.07.017

Prognostic scoring systems in burns : A review. / Sheppard, N. N.; Hemington-Gorse, S.; Shelley, O. P.; Philp, B.; Dziewulski, Peter.

In: Burns, Vol. 37, No. 8, 01.12.2011, p. 1288-1295.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Sheppard, NN, Hemington-Gorse, S, Shelley, OP, Philp, B & Dziewulski, P 2011, 'Prognostic scoring systems in burns: A review', Burns, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1288-1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.07.017
Sheppard NN, Hemington-Gorse S, Shelley OP, Philp B, Dziewulski P. Prognostic scoring systems in burns: A review. Burns. 2011 Dec 1;37(8):1288-1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.07.017
Sheppard, N. N. ; Hemington-Gorse, S. ; Shelley, O. P. ; Philp, B. ; Dziewulski, Peter. / Prognostic scoring systems in burns : A review. In: Burns. 2011 ; Vol. 37, No. 8. pp. 1288-1295.
@article{1bc749dcb2ae4702b5b7bb16fe20b4dd,
title = "Prognostic scoring systems in burns: A review",
abstract = "Survival after burn has steadily improved over the last few decades. Patient mortality is, however, still the primary outcome measure for burn care. Scoring systems aim to use the most predictive premorbid and injury factors to yield an expected likelihood of death for a given patient. Age, burn surface area and inhalational injury remain the mainstays of burn prognostication, but their relative weighting varies between scoring systems. Biochemical markers may hold the key to predicting outcomes in burns. Alternatively, the incorporation of global scales such as those used in the general intensive care unit may have relevance in burn patients. Outcomes other than mortality are increasingly relevant, especially as mortality after burns continues to improve. The evolution of prognostic scoring in burns is reviewed with specific reference to the more widely regarded measures. Alternative approaches to burn prognostication are reviewed along with evidence for the use of outcomes other than mortality. The purpose and utility of prognostic scoring in general is discussed with relevance to its potential uses in audit, research and at the bedside.",
keywords = "Burns, Mortality, Prognosis, Scoring system",
author = "Sheppard, {N. N.} and S. Hemington-Gorse and Shelley, {O. P.} and B. Philp and Peter Dziewulski",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.burns.2011.07.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "1288--1295",
journal = "Burns",
issn = "0305-4179",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognostic scoring systems in burns

T2 - A review

AU - Sheppard, N. N.

AU - Hemington-Gorse, S.

AU - Shelley, O. P.

AU - Philp, B.

AU - Dziewulski, Peter

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Survival after burn has steadily improved over the last few decades. Patient mortality is, however, still the primary outcome measure for burn care. Scoring systems aim to use the most predictive premorbid and injury factors to yield an expected likelihood of death for a given patient. Age, burn surface area and inhalational injury remain the mainstays of burn prognostication, but their relative weighting varies between scoring systems. Biochemical markers may hold the key to predicting outcomes in burns. Alternatively, the incorporation of global scales such as those used in the general intensive care unit may have relevance in burn patients. Outcomes other than mortality are increasingly relevant, especially as mortality after burns continues to improve. The evolution of prognostic scoring in burns is reviewed with specific reference to the more widely regarded measures. Alternative approaches to burn prognostication are reviewed along with evidence for the use of outcomes other than mortality. The purpose and utility of prognostic scoring in general is discussed with relevance to its potential uses in audit, research and at the bedside.

AB - Survival after burn has steadily improved over the last few decades. Patient mortality is, however, still the primary outcome measure for burn care. Scoring systems aim to use the most predictive premorbid and injury factors to yield an expected likelihood of death for a given patient. Age, burn surface area and inhalational injury remain the mainstays of burn prognostication, but their relative weighting varies between scoring systems. Biochemical markers may hold the key to predicting outcomes in burns. Alternatively, the incorporation of global scales such as those used in the general intensive care unit may have relevance in burn patients. Outcomes other than mortality are increasingly relevant, especially as mortality after burns continues to improve. The evolution of prognostic scoring in burns is reviewed with specific reference to the more widely regarded measures. Alternative approaches to burn prognostication are reviewed along with evidence for the use of outcomes other than mortality. The purpose and utility of prognostic scoring in general is discussed with relevance to its potential uses in audit, research and at the bedside.

KW - Burns

KW - Mortality

KW - Prognosis

KW - Scoring system

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80855139707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80855139707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.burns.2011.07.017

DO - 10.1016/j.burns.2011.07.017

M3 - Review article

VL - 37

SP - 1288

EP - 1295

JO - Burns

JF - Burns

SN - 0305-4179

IS - 8

ER -