Prospective Evaluation of Operating Room Inefficiency

Tarik D. Madni, Jonathan B. Imran, Audra T. Clark, Holly B. Cunningham, Luis Taveras, Brett D. Arnoldo, Herb A. Phelan, Steven Wolf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Previously, they identified that 60 per cent of their facility's total operative time is nonoperative. They performed a review of their operating room to determine where inefficiencies exist in nonoperative time. Live video of operations performed in a burn operating room from June 23, 2017 to August 16, 2017 was prospectively reviewed. Preparation (end of induction to procedure start) and turnover (patient out of room to next patient in room) were divided into the following activities: 1) Preparation: remove dressing, position patient, clean patient, drape patient, and 2) Turnover: clean operating room, scrub tray setup, anesthesia setup. Ideal preparation time was calculated as the sum of time needed to perform preparation activities consecutively. Ideal turnover time was calculated as the sum of time needed to clean the operating room and to set up either the scrub tray or anesthesia (the larger of the two times as these can be done in parallel). They reviewed 101 consecutive operations. An average of 2.4 ± 0.8 cases per day were performed. Ideal preparation and turnover time were 16.6 and 30.1 minutes, a 38.3 and 32.5 per cent reduction compared with actual times. Attending surgeon presence in the operating room within 10 minutes of a patient's arrival was found to significantly decrease time to incision by 33 per cent (52.7 ± 14.3 minutes down to 35.7 ± 20.4, P < .0001). A reduction in preparation and turnover time could save $1.02 million and generate $1.76 million in additional revenue annually. Reducing preparation and turnover to ideal times could increase caseload to 4 per day, leading to millions of dollars of savings annually.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)977-981
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Burn Care and Research
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 23 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Operating Rooms
Controlled Environment
Patients' Rooms
Anesthesia
Bandages
Operative Time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Madni, T. D., Imran, J. B., Clark, A. T., Cunningham, H. B., Taveras, L., Arnoldo, B. D., ... Wolf, S. (2018). Prospective Evaluation of Operating Room Inefficiency. Journal of Burn Care and Research, 39(6), 977-981. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iry016

Prospective Evaluation of Operating Room Inefficiency. / Madni, Tarik D.; Imran, Jonathan B.; Clark, Audra T.; Cunningham, Holly B.; Taveras, Luis; Arnoldo, Brett D.; Phelan, Herb A.; Wolf, Steven.

In: Journal of Burn Care and Research, Vol. 39, No. 6, 23.10.2018, p. 977-981.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Madni, TD, Imran, JB, Clark, AT, Cunningham, HB, Taveras, L, Arnoldo, BD, Phelan, HA & Wolf, S 2018, 'Prospective Evaluation of Operating Room Inefficiency', Journal of Burn Care and Research, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 977-981. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iry016
Madni TD, Imran JB, Clark AT, Cunningham HB, Taveras L, Arnoldo BD et al. Prospective Evaluation of Operating Room Inefficiency. Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2018 Oct 23;39(6):977-981. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iry016
Madni, Tarik D. ; Imran, Jonathan B. ; Clark, Audra T. ; Cunningham, Holly B. ; Taveras, Luis ; Arnoldo, Brett D. ; Phelan, Herb A. ; Wolf, Steven. / Prospective Evaluation of Operating Room Inefficiency. In: Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 6. pp. 977-981.
@article{94661eb0d161446a8f6348484f62514b,
title = "Prospective Evaluation of Operating Room Inefficiency",
abstract = "Previously, they identified that 60 per cent of their facility's total operative time is nonoperative. They performed a review of their operating room to determine where inefficiencies exist in nonoperative time. Live video of operations performed in a burn operating room from June 23, 2017 to August 16, 2017 was prospectively reviewed. Preparation (end of induction to procedure start) and turnover (patient out of room to next patient in room) were divided into the following activities: 1) Preparation: remove dressing, position patient, clean patient, drape patient, and 2) Turnover: clean operating room, scrub tray setup, anesthesia setup. Ideal preparation time was calculated as the sum of time needed to perform preparation activities consecutively. Ideal turnover time was calculated as the sum of time needed to clean the operating room and to set up either the scrub tray or anesthesia (the larger of the two times as these can be done in parallel). They reviewed 101 consecutive operations. An average of 2.4 ± 0.8 cases per day were performed. Ideal preparation and turnover time were 16.6 and 30.1 minutes, a 38.3 and 32.5 per cent reduction compared with actual times. Attending surgeon presence in the operating room within 10 minutes of a patient's arrival was found to significantly decrease time to incision by 33 per cent (52.7 ± 14.3 minutes down to 35.7 ± 20.4, P < .0001). A reduction in preparation and turnover time could save $1.02 million and generate $1.76 million in additional revenue annually. Reducing preparation and turnover to ideal times could increase caseload to 4 per day, leading to millions of dollars of savings annually.",
author = "Madni, {Tarik D.} and Imran, {Jonathan B.} and Clark, {Audra T.} and Cunningham, {Holly B.} and Luis Taveras and Arnoldo, {Brett D.} and Phelan, {Herb A.} and Steven Wolf",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1093/jbcr/iry016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "977--981",
journal = "Journal of Burn Care and Research",
issn = "1559-047X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective Evaluation of Operating Room Inefficiency

AU - Madni, Tarik D.

AU - Imran, Jonathan B.

AU - Clark, Audra T.

AU - Cunningham, Holly B.

AU - Taveras, Luis

AU - Arnoldo, Brett D.

AU - Phelan, Herb A.

AU - Wolf, Steven

PY - 2018/10/23

Y1 - 2018/10/23

N2 - Previously, they identified that 60 per cent of their facility's total operative time is nonoperative. They performed a review of their operating room to determine where inefficiencies exist in nonoperative time. Live video of operations performed in a burn operating room from June 23, 2017 to August 16, 2017 was prospectively reviewed. Preparation (end of induction to procedure start) and turnover (patient out of room to next patient in room) were divided into the following activities: 1) Preparation: remove dressing, position patient, clean patient, drape patient, and 2) Turnover: clean operating room, scrub tray setup, anesthesia setup. Ideal preparation time was calculated as the sum of time needed to perform preparation activities consecutively. Ideal turnover time was calculated as the sum of time needed to clean the operating room and to set up either the scrub tray or anesthesia (the larger of the two times as these can be done in parallel). They reviewed 101 consecutive operations. An average of 2.4 ± 0.8 cases per day were performed. Ideal preparation and turnover time were 16.6 and 30.1 minutes, a 38.3 and 32.5 per cent reduction compared with actual times. Attending surgeon presence in the operating room within 10 minutes of a patient's arrival was found to significantly decrease time to incision by 33 per cent (52.7 ± 14.3 minutes down to 35.7 ± 20.4, P < .0001). A reduction in preparation and turnover time could save $1.02 million and generate $1.76 million in additional revenue annually. Reducing preparation and turnover to ideal times could increase caseload to 4 per day, leading to millions of dollars of savings annually.

AB - Previously, they identified that 60 per cent of their facility's total operative time is nonoperative. They performed a review of their operating room to determine where inefficiencies exist in nonoperative time. Live video of operations performed in a burn operating room from June 23, 2017 to August 16, 2017 was prospectively reviewed. Preparation (end of induction to procedure start) and turnover (patient out of room to next patient in room) were divided into the following activities: 1) Preparation: remove dressing, position patient, clean patient, drape patient, and 2) Turnover: clean operating room, scrub tray setup, anesthesia setup. Ideal preparation time was calculated as the sum of time needed to perform preparation activities consecutively. Ideal turnover time was calculated as the sum of time needed to clean the operating room and to set up either the scrub tray or anesthesia (the larger of the two times as these can be done in parallel). They reviewed 101 consecutive operations. An average of 2.4 ± 0.8 cases per day were performed. Ideal preparation and turnover time were 16.6 and 30.1 minutes, a 38.3 and 32.5 per cent reduction compared with actual times. Attending surgeon presence in the operating room within 10 minutes of a patient's arrival was found to significantly decrease time to incision by 33 per cent (52.7 ± 14.3 minutes down to 35.7 ± 20.4, P < .0001). A reduction in preparation and turnover time could save $1.02 million and generate $1.76 million in additional revenue annually. Reducing preparation and turnover to ideal times could increase caseload to 4 per day, leading to millions of dollars of savings annually.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055196437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055196437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jbcr/iry016

DO - 10.1093/jbcr/iry016

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 977

EP - 981

JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research

JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research

SN - 1559-047X

IS - 6

ER -