Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Trial of a Bioartificial Liver in Treating Acute Liver Failure

  • Achilles A. Demetriou
  • , Robert S. Brown
  • , Ronald W. Busuttil
  • , Jeffrey Fair
  • , Brendan M. McGuire
  • , Philip Rosenthal
  • , Jan Schulte Am Esch
  • , Jan Lerut
  • , Scott L. Nyberg
  • , Mauro Salizzoni
  • , Elizabeth A. Fagan
  • , Bernard De Hemptinne
  • , Christoph E. Broelsch
  • , Maurizio Muraca
  • , Joan Manuel Salmron
  • , John M. Rabkin
  • , Herold J. Metselaar
  • , Daniel Pratt
  • , Manuel De La Mata
  • , Lawrence P. McChesney
  • Gregory T. Everson, Philip T. Lavin, Anthony C. Stevens, Zorina Pitkin, Barry A. Solomon, J. Michael Henderson, Ravi S. Chari, William C. Meyers, William C. Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The HepatAssist liver support system is an extracorporeal porcine hepatocyte-based bioartificial liver (BAL). The safety and efficacy of the BAL were evaluated in a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial in patients with severe acute liver failure. Summary Background Data: In experimental animals with acute liver failure, we demonstrated beneficial effects of the BAL. Similarly, Phase I trials of the BAL in acute liver failure patients yielded promising results. Methods: A total of 171 patients (86 control and 85 BAL) were enrolled. Patients with fulminant/subfulminant hepatic failure and primary nonfunction following liver transplantation were included. Data were analyzed with and without accounting for the following confounding factors: liver transplantation, time to transplant, disease etiology, disease severity, and treatment site. Results: For the entire patient population, survival at 30 days was 71% for BAL versus 62% for control (P = 0.26). After exclusion of primary nonfunction patients, survival was 73% for BAL versus 59% for control (n = 147; P = 0.12). When survival was analyzed accounting for confounding factors, in the entire patient population, there was no difference between the 2 groups (risk ratio = 0.67; P = 0.13). However, survival in fulminant/subfulminant hepatic failure patients was significantly higher in the BAL compared with the control group (risk ratio = 0.56; P = 0.048). Conclusions: This is the first prospective, randomized, controlled trial of an extracorporeal liver support system, demonstrating safety and improved survival in patients with fulminant/subfulminant hepatic failure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)660-670
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume239
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2004
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Trial of a Bioartificial Liver in Treating Acute Liver Failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this