Abstract
Fluid resuscitation of burn patients is commonly initiated using modified Brooke or Parkland formula. The fluid infusion rate is titrated up or down hourly to maintain adequate urine output and other endpoints. Over-resuscitation leads to morbid complications. Adherence to paper-based protocols, flow sheets, and clinical practice guidelines is associated with decreased fluid resuscitation volumes and complications. Computerized tools assist providers. Although completely autonomous closed-loop control of resuscitation has been demonstrated in animal models of burn shock, the major advantages of open-loop and decision-support systems are identifying trends, enhancing situational awareness, and encouraging burn team communication.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 599-610 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Critical Care Clinics |
Volume | 32 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 1 2016 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Burns
- Decision making—Computer-Assisted
- Decision support systems - Clinical
- Fluid resuscitation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine