Psychometric properties of stress and anxiety measures among nulliparous women

Carla M. Bann, Corette B. Parker, William A. Grobman, Marian Willinger, Hyagriv N. Simhan, Deborah A. Wing, David M. Haas, Robert M. Silver, Samuel Parry, George Saade, Ronald J. Wapner, Michal A. Elovitz, Emily S. Miller, Uma M. Reddy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the psychometric properties of three measures, the perceived stress scale (PSS), pregnancy experience scale (PES), and state trait anxiety inventory (STAI), for assessing stress and anxiety during pregnancy among a large sample of nulliparous women. Methods: The sample included 10,002 pregnant women participating in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nMoM2b). Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha and factorial validity with confirmatory factor analyses. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were calculated to determine stability of PSS scales over time. Psychometric properties were examined for the overall sample, as well as subgroups based on maternal age, race/ethnicity and language. Results: All three scales demonstrated good internal consistency reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the factor structures of the PSS and the PES. However, a one-factor solution of the trait-anxiety subscale from the STAI did not fit well; a two-factor solution, splitting the items into factors based on direction of item wording (positive versus negative) provided a better fit. Scores on the PSS were generally stable over time (ICC = 0.60). Subgroup analyses revealed a few items that did not perform well on Spanish versions of the scales. Conclusion: Overall, the scales performed well, suggesting they could be useful tools for identifying women experiencing high levels of stress and anxiety during pregnancy and allowing for the implementation of interventions to help reduce maternal stress and anxiety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Nov 9 2016

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Anxiety
Pregnancy
Statistical Factor Analysis
Mothers
Equipment and Supplies
Maternal Age
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnant Women
Language
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • parity
  • psychometrics
  • stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Bann, C. M., Parker, C. B., Grobman, W. A., Willinger, M., Simhan, H. N., Wing, D. A., ... Reddy, U. M. (Accepted/In press). Psychometric properties of stress and anxiety measures among nulliparous women. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1252910

Psychometric properties of stress and anxiety measures among nulliparous women. / Bann, Carla M.; Parker, Corette B.; Grobman, William A.; Willinger, Marian; Simhan, Hyagriv N.; Wing, Deborah A.; Haas, David M.; Silver, Robert M.; Parry, Samuel; Saade, George; Wapner, Ronald J.; Elovitz, Michal A.; Miller, Emily S.; Reddy, Uma M.

In: Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 09.11.2016, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bann, CM, Parker, CB, Grobman, WA, Willinger, M, Simhan, HN, Wing, DA, Haas, DM, Silver, RM, Parry, S, Saade, G, Wapner, RJ, Elovitz, MA, Miller, ES & Reddy, UM 2016, 'Psychometric properties of stress and anxiety measures among nulliparous women', Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1252910
Bann, Carla M. ; Parker, Corette B. ; Grobman, William A. ; Willinger, Marian ; Simhan, Hyagriv N. ; Wing, Deborah A. ; Haas, David M. ; Silver, Robert M. ; Parry, Samuel ; Saade, George ; Wapner, Ronald J. ; Elovitz, Michal A. ; Miller, Emily S. ; Reddy, Uma M. / Psychometric properties of stress and anxiety measures among nulliparous women. In: Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016 ; pp. 1-10.
@article{2e92c46e2d5040559528d6c89ff1e80e,
title = "Psychometric properties of stress and anxiety measures among nulliparous women",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the psychometric properties of three measures, the perceived stress scale (PSS), pregnancy experience scale (PES), and state trait anxiety inventory (STAI), for assessing stress and anxiety during pregnancy among a large sample of nulliparous women. Methods: The sample included 10,002 pregnant women participating in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nMoM2b). Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha and factorial validity with confirmatory factor analyses. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were calculated to determine stability of PSS scales over time. Psychometric properties were examined for the overall sample, as well as subgroups based on maternal age, race/ethnicity and language. Results: All three scales demonstrated good internal consistency reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the factor structures of the PSS and the PES. However, a one-factor solution of the trait-anxiety subscale from the STAI did not fit well; a two-factor solution, splitting the items into factors based on direction of item wording (positive versus negative) provided a better fit. Scores on the PSS were generally stable over time (ICC = 0.60). Subgroup analyses revealed a few items that did not perform well on Spanish versions of the scales. Conclusion: Overall, the scales performed well, suggesting they could be useful tools for identifying women experiencing high levels of stress and anxiety during pregnancy and allowing for the implementation of interventions to help reduce maternal stress and anxiety.",
keywords = "Anxiety, parity, psychometrics, stress",
author = "Bann, {Carla M.} and Parker, {Corette B.} and Grobman, {William A.} and Marian Willinger and Simhan, {Hyagriv N.} and Wing, {Deborah A.} and Haas, {David M.} and Silver, {Robert M.} and Samuel Parry and George Saade and Wapner, {Ronald J.} and Elovitz, {Michal A.} and Miller, {Emily S.} and Reddy, {Uma M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1080/0167482X.2016.1252910",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0167-482X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric properties of stress and anxiety measures among nulliparous women

AU - Bann, Carla M.

AU - Parker, Corette B.

AU - Grobman, William A.

AU - Willinger, Marian

AU - Simhan, Hyagriv N.

AU - Wing, Deborah A.

AU - Haas, David M.

AU - Silver, Robert M.

AU - Parry, Samuel

AU - Saade, George

AU - Wapner, Ronald J.

AU - Elovitz, Michal A.

AU - Miller, Emily S.

AU - Reddy, Uma M.

PY - 2016/11/9

Y1 - 2016/11/9

N2 - Objective: To examine the psychometric properties of three measures, the perceived stress scale (PSS), pregnancy experience scale (PES), and state trait anxiety inventory (STAI), for assessing stress and anxiety during pregnancy among a large sample of nulliparous women. Methods: The sample included 10,002 pregnant women participating in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nMoM2b). Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha and factorial validity with confirmatory factor analyses. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were calculated to determine stability of PSS scales over time. Psychometric properties were examined for the overall sample, as well as subgroups based on maternal age, race/ethnicity and language. Results: All three scales demonstrated good internal consistency reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the factor structures of the PSS and the PES. However, a one-factor solution of the trait-anxiety subscale from the STAI did not fit well; a two-factor solution, splitting the items into factors based on direction of item wording (positive versus negative) provided a better fit. Scores on the PSS were generally stable over time (ICC = 0.60). Subgroup analyses revealed a few items that did not perform well on Spanish versions of the scales. Conclusion: Overall, the scales performed well, suggesting they could be useful tools for identifying women experiencing high levels of stress and anxiety during pregnancy and allowing for the implementation of interventions to help reduce maternal stress and anxiety.

AB - Objective: To examine the psychometric properties of three measures, the perceived stress scale (PSS), pregnancy experience scale (PES), and state trait anxiety inventory (STAI), for assessing stress and anxiety during pregnancy among a large sample of nulliparous women. Methods: The sample included 10,002 pregnant women participating in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nMoM2b). Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha and factorial validity with confirmatory factor analyses. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) were calculated to determine stability of PSS scales over time. Psychometric properties were examined for the overall sample, as well as subgroups based on maternal age, race/ethnicity and language. Results: All three scales demonstrated good internal consistency reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the factor structures of the PSS and the PES. However, a one-factor solution of the trait-anxiety subscale from the STAI did not fit well; a two-factor solution, splitting the items into factors based on direction of item wording (positive versus negative) provided a better fit. Scores on the PSS were generally stable over time (ICC = 0.60). Subgroup analyses revealed a few items that did not perform well on Spanish versions of the scales. Conclusion: Overall, the scales performed well, suggesting they could be useful tools for identifying women experiencing high levels of stress and anxiety during pregnancy and allowing for the implementation of interventions to help reduce maternal stress and anxiety.

KW - Anxiety

KW - parity

KW - psychometrics

KW - stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995489138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995489138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0167482X.2016.1252910

DO - 10.1080/0167482X.2016.1252910

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0167-482X

ER -