Psychometric properties of upper extremity outcome measures validated by Rasch analysis: a systematic review

Ickpyo Hong, Heather S. Bonilha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of psychometric studies of upper extremity (UE) outcome measures validated by Rasch analysis and assess the extent to which their measurement areas cover the domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model. A literature search from 1966 to 2014 was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, Ovid/MEDLINE, ERIC, and Cochrane library. Fourteen keywords indicating ‘upper extremity’, ‘psychometric properties’, and ‘outcome measures’ were used. From a total of 1039 studies, 17 UE impairment outcome measures that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected and reviewed. The instruments targeted adults with various neurological or orthopedic conditions (i.e. stroke, upper and lower extremity impairments, and back pain). Twelve instruments targeted the body structure/function domain and 11 instruments targeted the activity domain of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model. Only two instruments targeted the participation domain. All outcome measures showed reasonably sound psychometric properties, including construct validity (good fit statistic), moderate to high reliability (r=0.86–0.99), and sound dimensionality (unidimensional). The reviewed psychometric properties of UE outcome measures are useful for clinicians in deciding which measures to use to assess patients’ UE impairments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Oct 14 2016

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Upper Extremity
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
Back Pain
PubMed
MEDLINE
Libraries
Orthopedics
Lower Extremity
Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{17a1dbf43cfc4c569f2f546c7a875e5c,
title = "Psychometric properties of upper extremity outcome measures validated by Rasch analysis: a systematic review",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of psychometric studies of upper extremity (UE) outcome measures validated by Rasch analysis and assess the extent to which their measurement areas cover the domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model. A literature search from 1966 to 2014 was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, Ovid/MEDLINE, ERIC, and Cochrane library. Fourteen keywords indicating ‘upper extremity’, ‘psychometric properties’, and ‘outcome measures’ were used. From a total of 1039 studies, 17 UE impairment outcome measures that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected and reviewed. The instruments targeted adults with various neurological or orthopedic conditions (i.e. stroke, upper and lower extremity impairments, and back pain). Twelve instruments targeted the body structure/function domain and 11 instruments targeted the activity domain of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model. Only two instruments targeted the participation domain. All outcome measures showed reasonably sound psychometric properties, including construct validity (good fit statistic), moderate to high reliability (r=0.86–0.99), and sound dimensionality (unidimensional). The reviewed psychometric properties of UE outcome measures are useful for clinicians in deciding which measures to use to assess patients’ UE impairments.",
author = "Ickpyo Hong and Bonilha, {Heather S.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1097/MRR.0000000000000202",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "International Journal of Rehabilitation Research",
issn = "0342-5282",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric properties of upper extremity outcome measures validated by Rasch analysis

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Hong, Ickpyo

AU - Bonilha, Heather S.

PY - 2016/10/14

Y1 - 2016/10/14

N2 - The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of psychometric studies of upper extremity (UE) outcome measures validated by Rasch analysis and assess the extent to which their measurement areas cover the domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model. A literature search from 1966 to 2014 was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, Ovid/MEDLINE, ERIC, and Cochrane library. Fourteen keywords indicating ‘upper extremity’, ‘psychometric properties’, and ‘outcome measures’ were used. From a total of 1039 studies, 17 UE impairment outcome measures that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected and reviewed. The instruments targeted adults with various neurological or orthopedic conditions (i.e. stroke, upper and lower extremity impairments, and back pain). Twelve instruments targeted the body structure/function domain and 11 instruments targeted the activity domain of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model. Only two instruments targeted the participation domain. All outcome measures showed reasonably sound psychometric properties, including construct validity (good fit statistic), moderate to high reliability (r=0.86–0.99), and sound dimensionality (unidimensional). The reviewed psychometric properties of UE outcome measures are useful for clinicians in deciding which measures to use to assess patients’ UE impairments.

AB - The aim of this study was to provide a systematic review of psychometric studies of upper extremity (UE) outcome measures validated by Rasch analysis and assess the extent to which their measurement areas cover the domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model. A literature search from 1966 to 2014 was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, Ovid/MEDLINE, ERIC, and Cochrane library. Fourteen keywords indicating ‘upper extremity’, ‘psychometric properties’, and ‘outcome measures’ were used. From a total of 1039 studies, 17 UE impairment outcome measures that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected and reviewed. The instruments targeted adults with various neurological or orthopedic conditions (i.e. stroke, upper and lower extremity impairments, and back pain). Twelve instruments targeted the body structure/function domain and 11 instruments targeted the activity domain of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model. Only two instruments targeted the participation domain. All outcome measures showed reasonably sound psychometric properties, including construct validity (good fit statistic), moderate to high reliability (r=0.86–0.99), and sound dimensionality (unidimensional). The reviewed psychometric properties of UE outcome measures are useful for clinicians in deciding which measures to use to assess patients’ UE impairments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991503808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991503808&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000202

DO - 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000202

M3 - Article

C2 - 27755166

AN - SCOPUS:84991503808

JO - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

JF - International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

SN - 0342-5282

ER -