Psychosocial well-being and community participation of service dog partners

Diane Collins, Shirley G. Fitzgerald, Natalie Sachs-Ericsson, Marcia Scherer, Rory A. Cooper, Michael L. Boninger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. This cross-sectional study examined whether partnering with service dogs influenced psychosocial well-being and community participation of adult individuals using wheelchairs or scooters. Method. One hundred and fifty-two people were recruited and group-matched, resulting in 76 participants with and 76 without service dogs. Standardized scale scores for affect, depressive symptoms, self-esteem, and loneliness were used to operationally define psychosocial well-being. Community participation was assessed with the Social Integration domain of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Results. Psychosocial characteristics did not differ significantly between those partnered with and without service dogs overall. However, of participants with progressive conditions, those with service dogs demonstrated significantly higher positive affect scores than comparison group participants. Among those with clinical depression, service dog partners scored significantly higher in positive affect. Finally, regardless of whether individuals had service dogs, fewer depressive symptoms and being female or married were predictors of greater community participation. Conclusion. Select individuals may experience psychosocial benefits from partnering with service dogs. However, it is unclear if these benefits might also be derived from companion dogs. Further research is needed to substantiate the findings of this study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-48
Number of pages8
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
Volume1
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wheelchairs
Social Welfare
Dogs
Depression
Loneliness
Community Participation
Self Concept
Research Design
Cross-Sectional Studies
Research

Keywords

  • Affect
  • community participation
  • depressive symptoms
  • disability
  • service dogs
  • wheelchairs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Speech and Hearing
  • Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Psychosocial well-being and community participation of service dog partners. / Collins, Diane; Fitzgerald, Shirley G.; Sachs-Ericsson, Natalie; Scherer, Marcia; Cooper, Rory A.; Boninger, Michael L.

In: Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1-2, 2006, p. 41-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Collins, Diane ; Fitzgerald, Shirley G. ; Sachs-Ericsson, Natalie ; Scherer, Marcia ; Cooper, Rory A. ; Boninger, Michael L. / Psychosocial well-being and community participation of service dog partners. In: Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2006 ; Vol. 1, No. 1-2. pp. 41-48.
@article{4758f523751e44a295803cdd2ee8b9e5,
title = "Psychosocial well-being and community participation of service dog partners",
abstract = "Purpose. This cross-sectional study examined whether partnering with service dogs influenced psychosocial well-being and community participation of adult individuals using wheelchairs or scooters. Method. One hundred and fifty-two people were recruited and group-matched, resulting in 76 participants with and 76 without service dogs. Standardized scale scores for affect, depressive symptoms, self-esteem, and loneliness were used to operationally define psychosocial well-being. Community participation was assessed with the Social Integration domain of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Results. Psychosocial characteristics did not differ significantly between those partnered with and without service dogs overall. However, of participants with progressive conditions, those with service dogs demonstrated significantly higher positive affect scores than comparison group participants. Among those with clinical depression, service dog partners scored significantly higher in positive affect. Finally, regardless of whether individuals had service dogs, fewer depressive symptoms and being female or married were predictors of greater community participation. Conclusion. Select individuals may experience psychosocial benefits from partnering with service dogs. However, it is unclear if these benefits might also be derived from companion dogs. Further research is needed to substantiate the findings of this study.",
keywords = "Affect, community participation, depressive symptoms, disability, service dogs, wheelchairs",
author = "Diane Collins and Fitzgerald, {Shirley G.} and Natalie Sachs-Ericsson and Marcia Scherer and Cooper, {Rory A.} and Boninger, {Michael L.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1080/09638280500167183",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "41--48",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology",
issn = "1748-3115",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychosocial well-being and community participation of service dog partners

AU - Collins, Diane

AU - Fitzgerald, Shirley G.

AU - Sachs-Ericsson, Natalie

AU - Scherer, Marcia

AU - Cooper, Rory A.

AU - Boninger, Michael L.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Purpose. This cross-sectional study examined whether partnering with service dogs influenced psychosocial well-being and community participation of adult individuals using wheelchairs or scooters. Method. One hundred and fifty-two people were recruited and group-matched, resulting in 76 participants with and 76 without service dogs. Standardized scale scores for affect, depressive symptoms, self-esteem, and loneliness were used to operationally define psychosocial well-being. Community participation was assessed with the Social Integration domain of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Results. Psychosocial characteristics did not differ significantly between those partnered with and without service dogs overall. However, of participants with progressive conditions, those with service dogs demonstrated significantly higher positive affect scores than comparison group participants. Among those with clinical depression, service dog partners scored significantly higher in positive affect. Finally, regardless of whether individuals had service dogs, fewer depressive symptoms and being female or married were predictors of greater community participation. Conclusion. Select individuals may experience psychosocial benefits from partnering with service dogs. However, it is unclear if these benefits might also be derived from companion dogs. Further research is needed to substantiate the findings of this study.

AB - Purpose. This cross-sectional study examined whether partnering with service dogs influenced psychosocial well-being and community participation of adult individuals using wheelchairs or scooters. Method. One hundred and fifty-two people were recruited and group-matched, resulting in 76 participants with and 76 without service dogs. Standardized scale scores for affect, depressive symptoms, self-esteem, and loneliness were used to operationally define psychosocial well-being. Community participation was assessed with the Social Integration domain of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Results. Psychosocial characteristics did not differ significantly between those partnered with and without service dogs overall. However, of participants with progressive conditions, those with service dogs demonstrated significantly higher positive affect scores than comparison group participants. Among those with clinical depression, service dog partners scored significantly higher in positive affect. Finally, regardless of whether individuals had service dogs, fewer depressive symptoms and being female or married were predictors of greater community participation. Conclusion. Select individuals may experience psychosocial benefits from partnering with service dogs. However, it is unclear if these benefits might also be derived from companion dogs. Further research is needed to substantiate the findings of this study.

KW - Affect

KW - community participation

KW - depressive symptoms

KW - disability

KW - service dogs

KW - wheelchairs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64549094712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64549094712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09638280500167183

DO - 10.1080/09638280500167183

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 41

EP - 48

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

SN - 1748-3115

IS - 1-2

ER -